It is currently 17 Feb 2018, 16:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Yes. It was I who let the dogs out.
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 42
Location: Canada
H: B
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-31-2013
GMAT ToolKit User
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2013, 09:41
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

A.Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists.
B.According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for 10 months.
C.A scribe would be able to copy a page of text the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.
D.There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100s.
E.The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist.

Edit: by carcass

_________________

Yogi Bhajan: If you want to learn a thing, read that; if you want to know a thing, write that; if you want to master a thing, teach that.
This message transmitted on 100% recycled electrons.

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2012
Posts: 1
Re: Strengthen > Codex Berinensis> Answer with Explanation [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2013, 12:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
I select option D by the process of elimination.
Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7934
Location: Pune, India
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2013, 21:38
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
hb wrote:
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

A.Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists.
B.According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for 10 months.
C.A scribe would be able to copy a page of text the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.
D.There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100s.
E.The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist.

Edit: by carcass


Premises:
Codex Berinensis is undated but contains clues to when it was produced.
Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption.
A letter written by fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148

Conclusion: Codex Berinensis was probably produced in 1148.

We are looking for some major disruption to explain the frequent change of copyists. A letter written by fourth copyist talks of a plague in 1148. So the conclusion drawn is that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148. Notice that it is a very weak conclusion. All we know is that one person who worked on the codex also wrote a letter talking about a plague 1148. To conclude that the codex was written in 1148, we need more info - e.g. was there a plague in another year around that time? what about war or some other disruption? etc

Option (D) says that there was only one outbreak of plague in 1100s. This strengthens the conclusion. Of course, we still cannot establish the conclusion without doubt, but it does strengthen it. Hence (D) is the answer.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 557
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2013, 10:05
Negeting the arguement is the only way to solve this tricky number
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 21:38
I don't get the point here. We are in habit of taking premises as true and thus we can't challenge premises. However, in this question and OA the premise has been challenged.

Here is the first look,

Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Conclusion:Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

So When it is already mentioned that Plague happened to be in 1148 then what is the reason to speculate another plague.

Furthermore, had it been that a plague would have occurred before 1148 , still the writer mentioned a plague IN 1148 and then the book should have been completed by then.

Plz advise
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2013
Posts: 1
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Research (Investment Banking)
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2013, 04:42
I chose C because

: if a scribe can produce one page in a day, then the book would have taken only 80 days so must have been written around the same time as the fourth author who mentions 1148
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 12
Schools: HBS '17
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V35
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2013, 06:36
Not very sure on how D strengthens the conclusion.
- Only one plague in the century. He wrote about the plague in 1148.
- Ten plagues in the century. He could still write about the plague in 1148.
Could you please explain?

Here is my reasoning-
1) Not relevant
2) Not relevant, though could be a trap if selection is done purely based on words.
3) Not relevant
4) Feel is a trap based on words.
5) If the last writer had 1000 more pages to write, and he starts writing when the actual plague happens (big big assumption) the book would finish after few months / years. But that's not the case. Thus he must have finished that year itself.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 92
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2014, 23:45
Let see some interesting Analysis of why D could not be a better choice:

We will not assumed two things, which are not given in the argument and are as follows:
a. Letter was concluding part or atleast a part of Codex Berinensis.
b. All writers wrote the treaty once and subsequently (one copyist finished his part and subsequently other started his) We can’t assume who actually wrote the concluding part of treaty.


To strengthen the argument, we only have to strengthen the possibility that among all three copyists fourth copyist was the last one to write for treaty and he completed the Codex Berinensis in year 1148.

Lets analyze answer choice D and E

Option D only proves two things: the fourth copyist was alive in 1148 and plague mentioned in the letter outburst in 1148. Nowhere it is mentioned that letter was the concluding part of Codex Berinensis . Generally, copyist writes many things in a time period, we cannot assume the finishing date of one write-up to be the date of another too. (Also be cautious to assume that letter was the concluding part of the treaty)
E. The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist. (Here is the mathematical catch-

As this answer tells that all four wrote subsequently, it can be inferred that the fourth one was the last copyist to add his part of writing and conclude it.

It also tells us that whatever combination of three numbers (in ascending order ) we take to divide 20 pages among three copyist, the maximum number of pages the fourth one will get is 5 ( 8/7/5).

Option E tells us that fourth copyist was the last one to write and that among all copyists he got the least number (at most 5 pages) of pages to write.

So if we add these facts as 2 more premise to the conclusion:
a. Fourth copyist was the last one to write.
b. Among all copyists, He got the least number of pages, maximum 5, to write for the treaty

It adds more weight to the conclusion than does by option D or by any other answer.

Just to add, “significant disruption” only indicates that the process of writing was continue in 1148,however, it does not indicate anything about finishing of the treaty in 1148.

In the best interest of all GMATclub friends
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Nov 2013
Posts: 92
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2014, 00:11
ashutoshr wrote:
Not very sure on how D strengthens the conclusion.
- Only one plague in the century. He wrote about the plague in 1148.
- Ten plagues in the century. He could still write about the plague in 1148.
Could you please explain?

Here is my reasoning-
1) Not relevant
2) Not relevant, though could be a trap if selection is done purely based on words.
3) Not relevant
4) Feel is a trap based on words.
5) If the last writer had 1000 more pages to write, and he starts writing when the actual plague happens (big big assumption) the book would finish after few months / years. But that's not the case. Thus he must have finished that year itself.

Posted from my mobile device


:) you have awesome intuition. Yes!! option D is a trap.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 896
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2014, 00:56
There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100s.


Even if there was only one outbreak in 1100 and that was in 1148, the book can very well be written in 2000 since the fourth writer can complete the book in 2000 and mention the plague happened in 1148.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2013
Posts: 5
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2014, 16:04
I don't see it. I came down to C and D, and chose C. I picked C because it reduced the possibility that the text was written over a long period of time (years). For example, it could be the case that manually copying entire book takes so long that the work was started in 1147 and finished in 1149, with a disruption happening in 1148. Moreover, I eliminated D because the letter writer explicitly states that there was a plague in that specific year, but this does not eliminate the possibility that something else caused the disruption mentioned in the question stem (frequent feudal wars, earthquakes, floods etc.). So if it was caused by the plague it was probably that one, and if there were other plagues the author would have been more likely to survive them and would mentioned them in the letter too...I mean, sure, I can see both of them being correct, but why would I assume that the problem of another plague causing the disruption would be any greater than the problem of actually being able to complete a work in a single year.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 590
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jun 2014, 04:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
D.

It says that the 1148 plague was the only plague that occurred in the 1100s. If no other plague occurred during this time, this strengthens the possibility that the 1148 plague was the cause of the disruption mentioned by the author. If there had been more than one plague during this period, then a plague in a year other than 1148 could have disrupted the copying of the Codex. Since there was no other plague, the author’s hypothesis is strengthened.
_________________

Like my post Send me a Kudos :) It is a Good manner.
My Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-score-750-and-750-i-moved-from-710-to-189016.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 113
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 03:54
I don't understand how D is the correct answer. The 4th copyist could very well have produced the book in 1149, heck even 1160, or any other date.
How's this the correct answer? O.o
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 211
Location: India
Schools: IIMC (A)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 2.6
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Reviews Badge
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 04:44
hb wrote:
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

A.Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists.
B.According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for 10 months.
C.A scribe would be able to copy a page of text the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.
D.There was only one outbreak of plague in Florence in the 1100s.
E.The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist.

Edit: by carcass


This can be answered by the process of elemination. We need a strong / best proof from the 5 options given.

A. - This can be eleminated since no known samples of the first three coyists won't help in knowing the year in which Codex was produced
B - This is a tricky option, since the readers might get confused and think that since the timeline is provided, the codex could have been produced in this duration. Behold!!!! the other 3 options are on their way
C - Naaaaahhhhh.... No need to even ponder on this case
D - If there was only one outbreak in 1100 and that outbreak finds place in the codex, it mught suggest that the codex could have been produced in 1100s
E - Sorry no explaination required.

Now we are left with two choices - B & D. Lets compare them - The timeline would not help in determining the year of the plague. But if there was only one out break in 1100s, ther's a bleak possibility that the codex could have been written during thst time.

Frankly - There's no one option which would confirm that, but out of the 5, D seems best
_________________

Give KUDOS if the post helps you... :-D

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7934
Location: Pune, India
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 20:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
mahendru1992 wrote:
I don't understand how D is the correct answer. The 4th copyist could very well have produced the book in 1149, heck even 1160, or any other date.
How's this the correct answer? O.o


Link it up with the frequent change of copyists after 80 pages. Copyists kept changing implies some major disruption. There was a major disruption in 1148. So it might have been written in 1148. Copyists had to be changed because they were getting affected by plague. If there was no other plague in 1100s, it strengthens the conclusion that it was written in 1148. But as said before, it is a very weak conclusion. There could be many other reasons for change of copyists.
No other option strengthens the conclusion at all. Hence (D) is the most suitable out of the lot.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 113
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2014, 21:38
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
mahendru1992 wrote:
I don't understand how D is the correct answer. The 4th copyist could very well have produced the book in 1149, heck even 1160, or any other date.
How's this the correct answer? O.o


Link it up with the frequent change of copyists after 80 pages. Copyists kept changing implies some major disruption. There was a major disruption in 1148. So it might have been written in 1148. Copyists had to be changed because they were getting affected by plague. If there was no other plague in 1100s, it strengthens the conclusion that it was written in 1148. But as said before, it is a very weak conclusion. There could be many other reasons for change of copyists.
No other option strengthens the conclusion at all. Hence (D) is the most suitable out of the lot.


Thanks Karishma for replying!
I know that we shouldn't question OG solutions, but in the case of this question, I can't really help myself.
Granted that there was only one plague in the 1100s and there was some major disruption due to which the remaining 20 pages were written by 3 different copyist.
Now why are we assuming that there was only one major disruption here???
We could very well say that there was a major earthquake or even volcanic disruption between the 2nd and 3rd copyist and the plague that affected many people was witnessed by the 4th copyist.
But I'm digressing here.
even if the argument says that the 4th copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in 1148 and D says that there was a major disruption in 1148 why are we assuming that he wrote about the plague in that year only and not a year or two after. I still don't understant! Don't you think we're assuming too much into this? IMO, none of the options strengthen the argument. We're just skewing our reasons to match with the correct answer. I don't know, I think I'm missing something here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2013
Posts: 61
Reviews Badge
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2014, 03:58
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient
Roman medical treatise, is undated but contains clues
to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a
single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by
three different copyists, which indicates some
significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a
plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced
in 1148?

(A) Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no
known samples of the handwriting of the first
three copyists.
(B) According to the account by the fourth copyist,
the plague went on for 10 months.
(C) A scribe would be able to copy a page of text
the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.
(D) There was only one outbreak of plague in
Florence in the 1100s.
(E) The number of pages of Codex Berinensis
produced by a single scribe becomes smaller
with each successive change of copyist.

Got the correct answer as D.

Both Options B and D are closer, but D is the best answer choice.

Option B does help to state that the event was a big disruption.

But option D is much stronger.

Hope this helps!
_________________

'The best way to thank or appreciate efforts on this forum is to give Kudos.'

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2014
Posts: 20
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: IIMA (PGPX)
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2014, 00:26
1
This post received
KUDOS
Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient roman medical treatise , is undated but contains clues to when it was produced. Its first eighty pages are by a single copyist, but the remaining twenty pages are by three different copyists, which indicates some significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in florence in 1148, Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.
Her
Conclusion: The book was probably produced in 1148.
Assumption: After the third writer, fourth writer took less than an year to complete the book.

Many people tend to confuse that the writer simply mentioned 1148. But how come he wrote that only 1148. I can quote what happened in 1148 and 2014. Here we are simply trying to strengthen it . That is we are simply increasing the chances with new evidence.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced in 1148?

a) Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no known samples of the handwriting of the first three copyists. Book produced in 1148 has nothing to do with no known samples of first three copyists. Note we are only concerned about this book and year
b) According to the account by the fourth copyist, the plague went on for ten months. I can simply quote an even happened in past in present. It has nothing to do with prove book and year in which it is likely to produced.
c) A scribe would be able to copy a page of text the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day. General fact. Doesn't go with conclusion
d) there was only on outbreak of plague in florence in the 1100s - Correct answer. Only major event in 1148 that could have stopped the previous three. The fourth guy would have started here in 1148. Not we are just strengthning we are not proving that it is finished in 1148. This answer would have been straight forward if the conclusion had indicated that book must have been produced post 1148.
e) The number of pages of Codex Berinensis produced by a single scribe becomes smaller with each successive change of copyist - [color=#0000ff]OFS.One can take 100 years to produce 100 pages. So what ? No evidence that the book is completed in 1148 . [/color]
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 119
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2014, 01:55
The assumption involved in stating the letter about plague means CB produced in 1148 is probably that the fourth typist also died due to plague!! He cannot write about a plague before it happens but can of course write about it after it happens (ofcourse if he survives that). Can't say, the arguments takes a very long logical jump!

Tough one!
NUS Thread Master
User avatar
Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 117
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Oct 2014, 07:49
Straight D .. if we know there was only one outbreak in 1100 years , then we are sure that he pointed out to that year only.
time :1.20 mins
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Re: Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman   [#permalink] 07 Oct 2014, 07:49

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 78 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient Roman

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.