GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 01:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 160
Location: New York, NY

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2009, 12:08
netcaesar wrote:
Can you infer something that is stated?

The OA is D

It's not explicitly stated. Inferences are "almost" stated, but not written in the form of a statement.
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 97
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Nov 2013, 10:17
Only D can be inferred from the stimulus. By POE, I was able to eliminate all the out of scope and irrelevant choices. D stands out.
_________________
+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks

"Pay attention to every detail"
Manager
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 156
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2014, 00:03
Go for D. What I can infer from the passage: spelling foreign words require knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics.
_________________
.........................................................................
+1 Kudos please, if you like my post
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 477
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2016, 22:37
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?
a)The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.
b)Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell.
c)Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language.
d)To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation.
e)The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages.

The essence of this argument lies in its first line wherein the author/columnist is stating that the spelling bee winner won by spelling the spoken word correctly. So he must have deduced the spelling from the pronunciation of the judge. Hence D fits the bill.

Choice A - not necessary - we can't deduce the information from the argument.
Choice B - again it mentions richness in the native language and blah blah but doesn't draw a comparison
Choice C - cant deduce that
Choice E - cant deduce that
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2015
Posts: 56
GMAT 1: 460 Q32 V22
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2016, 23:00
ArvGMAT wrote:
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?
a)The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.
b)Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell.
c)Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language.
d)To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation.
e)The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages.

The correct answer here is D. The contestant here has to know all the aspects of word such as in which language does it belong and the phonetics. However spelling be contest are designed to test the contestants spelling capability regardless of other aspects of the word. And most of the words from other foreign languages are already been anglicized in the english language dictionary. Hence the correct choice which represent what all contestant has to know apart from the spelling word.

------------------------------------------------------
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2401
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Jan 2017, 21:56
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Type - Inference

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?
a)The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary. - This may be true but is not must be true
b)Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell. - Out of scope
c)Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language. - it's nearly impossible for a statement containing "should" to be required . Also this goes against what the argument says
d)To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation. - the mention of "knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics" in the passage; this implies that correct spelling of foreign (non-english) words requires such knowledge.
e)The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages. - Out of scope

_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2015
Posts: 29
Location: India
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2017, 08:31
I took 4 mins to choose the correct answer. I'm getting too slow.
_________________
Never give up !
Intern
Joined: 25 Sep 2016
Posts: 16
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2017, 22:40

A: Here, the winner doesn't have to know how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.

B: Here, It is not necessary that all of the contestant will find foreign words more difficult.

C: Here, this is what author is against of.

D: This is correct answer, the author wants to exclude foreign words because author wants spelling bee should be based on spelling ability , not on the "knowledge of linguistics and international Phonetics."

E: This might be true but not necessarily.
Manager
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 123
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2017, 07:40
ArvGMAT wrote:
Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee won by correctly spelling the spoken word Ursprache, which means "fame" in German. Given the richness of our language, why must we resort to words taken from modern foreign languages to challenge our best spellers? Ursprache is listed in our dictionary, as are words from many other foreign languages, but future spelling bees should limit themselves to words in our dictionary that have been anglicized in all aspects because spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Which of the following can most reasonably be inferred from the argument above?
a)The spelling contest winner knew how to spell most of the anglicized words in the dictionary.
b)Foreign words are more difficult than anglicized words for all contestants to spell.
c)Spelling contestant winners should be determined by their facility with all aspects of language.
d)To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation.
e)The English language contains more borrowed words than most other languages.

The argument states that spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.

Option D states "To spell foreign words, contestants must recognize the language and know its pronunciation".If this is not the case why would the author state that the foreign words should not be included in the competition mentioning the premise that spelling English words, not knowledge of linguistics and international phonetics, is the point of these contests.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5930
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Jan 2019, 19:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Columnist: The winner of this year's national spelling bee   [#permalink] 14 Jan 2019, 19:37

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 30 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by