Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 24 Mar 2017, 11:09

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 213
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 704 [14] , given: 974

Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2010, 04:43
14
This post received
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

47% (01:54) correct 53% (01:04) wrong based on 693 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 213
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 704 [3] , given: 974

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2010, 04:45
3
This post received
KUDOS
If you like my question, you can give KUDOS. Thanks a lot
Manager
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 213
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 704 [1] , given: 974

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2010, 04:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
Here is an OE:
(Pronoun Error) The first “that” in the underlined part is a conjunction, while the
second “that” (in the phrase “as that of the forty-eight states that remain”) is a
singular pronoun. The earlier part of the sentence shows that there is no singular
noun, which could serve as an antecedent for “as that.” So, (A) is wrong. (D) has the
same error, and can be eliminated for that reason alone.
In (B), the word “worth” serves as the antecedent of the pronoun “that:” that of the
forty-eight states. But this directly compares the value to the remaining states,
resulting in the comparison of an apple (the worth of the cattle) and an orange (the
remaining states); hence, (B) is wrong.
(C) and (E) are both grammatically correct. The difference is in the phrases “almost
as much in worth as” and “worth almost as much as.” Between the two, the latter is
shorter and is therefore more idiomatic, and (E) is the answer.
(It is always best to choose the shorter version when in doubt; the fewer words the
better, and usually the clearer.)
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3758
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 758

Kudos [?]: 5879 [3] , given: 324

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2010, 08:08
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The legitimate question here is whether ‘worth’ is a count noun or a non- count noun. Worth is a value. There is nothing like this has one worth, two worths and ten worths. Therefore it is singular.

What can not be counted therefore will not entail a plural pronoun such as ‘those’. Hence C and E have to be ruled out. A is also out because of taking cattle as plural and using the plural verb are. B is using an improper comparison. Only D could be a valid answer, IMO
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2010
Posts: 197
Location: Prague
Schools: University of Economics Prague
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 15

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2010, 04:09
What is the source of this question?

I also picked D
_________________

You want somethin', go get it. Period!

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1708
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 101

Kudos [?]: 954 [0], given: 109

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2010, 09:43
+1 D

I think that E is not correct also because it should be:
"... cattle THAT worthS almost as much as THAT OF..."

What do you think daagh?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3758
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 758

Kudos [?]: 5879 [0], given: 324

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Dec 2010, 11:29
@ Metalicafan; As far as I remember, the word ‘worth’ can be used only either as a noun or as an adjective. It can not used as a verb. So the first part of your suggestion “...raised cattle THAT worthS almost as much as THAT OF..." may not be a grammatical expression.
However the second part of your suggestion is perfectly right.
Cattle is uncountable in the given context, because it refers to the entire herd of cattle that is within states. Hence using ‘that of’ is better than ‘those of’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Posts: 260
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 606 [0], given: 11

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2010, 12:04
is the oa given correct. I picked D for similar reasons to daagh.
_________________

Verbal:new-to-the-verbal-forum-please-read-this-first-77546.html
Math: new-to-the-math-forum-please-read-this-first-77764.html
Gmat: everything-you-need-to-prepare-for-the-gmat-revised-77983.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ajit

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2010
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Texas & Kansas [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Dec 2010, 04:29
@Daagh

>>Cattle is uncountable in the given context, because it refers to the entire herd of cattle that is within states. Hence using ‘that of’ is better than ‘those of’

First post on the forum, I hope it makes sense..

The second that in the sentence refers to herds of cattle, that belong to the other 48 states. Herds of cattle are countable, hence those works better.
Manager
Joined: 26 Dec 2011
Posts: 117
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 17

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2012, 01:58
My pick is D as well, given that those refers back to cattle, which takes singular verb, I believe E should not be the right answer. Please correct if I am wrong!

Ex: Cattle is crossing the road; not cattle are crossing the road!
Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 21

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2012, 06:41
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain- Not Ok
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain-Not Ok
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.-As much in-Incorrect
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.-As much in-in-Incorrect
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states-Sounds more logical (as much as and those)
Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2012
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jul 2012, 11:27
I had it narrowed down to A and E.

Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain. - too many "that"
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain. - sounds awkward and makes no sense
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states. - preposition "in" is awkwardly place and doesn't seem to fit.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states. - preposition "in" is awkwardly place and doesn't seem to fit.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states. - makes a a comparison of cattle from texas/kansas to those of the remaining 48 states.
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2011
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 16

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Dec 2012, 16:08
feruz77 wrote:
Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.

So whats the OA?? I go with D, since cattle should be considered singular and that represents Singular, while those represents plural.
Hence the answer is D.
Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2013
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Sep 2013, 19:11
D looks correct. Can some one explain official answer for this.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2030
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 65

Kudos [?]: 622 [0], given: 355

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 11:33
feruz77 wrote:
Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.

Still waiting for OA here. It is a clear battle between D and E. Who will win?
I think the most important thing is to ask ourselves

Is cattle singular or plural?

Cheers
J
Manager
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Posts: 153
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [4] , given: 36

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Oct 2013, 12:06
4
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
jlgdr wrote:
feruz77 wrote:
Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.

Still waiting for OA here. It is a clear battle between D and E. Who will win?
I think the most important thing is to ask ourselves

Is cattle singular or plural?

Cheers
J

Even I marked D.

But I just found an interesting piece of information....Our general notion is that collective nouns such as army etc are singular. However Words such as cattle/police are plural (exceptions )

So the OA is correct and is E
_________________

Maadhu

MGMAT1 - 540 ( Trying to improve )

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 2030
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 770 Q0 V
Followers: 65

Kudos [?]: 622 [0], given: 355

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2013, 08:42
maaadhu wrote:
jlgdr wrote:
feruz77 wrote:
Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.

Still waiting for OA here. It is a clear battle between D and E. Who will win?
I think the most important thing is to ask ourselves

Is cattle singular or plural?

Cheers
J

Even I marked D.

But I just found an interesting piece of information....Our general notion is that collective nouns such as army etc are singular. However Words such as cattle/police are plural (exceptions )

So the OA is correct and is E

This is very interesting indeed. I think that given the few exceptions it is worth to know them.
700-800 question can be very tricky in actual GMAT

Cheers
J
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10668
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2015, 22:11
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Posts: 16
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 19

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2015, 04:34
feruz77 wrote:
Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(A) that are worth almost as much as that of the forty-eight states that remain.
(B) of a worth that is almost as much as the forty-eight states that remain.
(C) almost as much in worth as those of the remaining forty-eight states.
(D) almost as much in worth as that of the remaining forty-eight states.
(E) worth almost as much as those of the remaining forty-eight states.

E can not be correct: according to MGGMAT in those of the remaining forty-eight states those of should be that of.
and if we are changing it to plural from singular then we should repeat whole thing from the first part(cattle).
_________________

The only person you should try to be better than, is the person you were yesterday.

And I need your help in this journey of improvement. So if you find any grammatical mistake in my sentences, please ping me a correct version along with the reason.

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10668
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2016, 10:46
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth   [#permalink] 22 Jul 2016, 10:46

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
It is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that 13 18 Jan 2009, 14:03
It is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that 2 26 Jul 2008, 05:49
It is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that 4 10 Nov 2007, 14:53
It is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that 1 22 Jun 2007, 21:40
It is an oversimplified view of cattle raising to say that 11 27 May 2007, 18:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Combined, Texas and Kansas raise cattle that are worth

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.