GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Nov 2018, 10:08

Gmatbusters' Weekly Quant Quiz

Join here 


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in November
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829301
Open Detailed Calendar
  • FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

     November 18, 2018

     November 18, 2018

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. November 18th, 7 AM PST
  • How to QUICKLY Solve GMAT Questions - GMAT Club Chat

     November 20, 2018

     November 20, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat.

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 238
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-27-2012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2011, 10:31
i ll go with B.

prasannar OA Please.
_________________

kudos me if you like my post.

Attitude determine everything.
all the best and God bless you.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 53
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Mar 2011, 21:25
terp26 wrote:
im joining th B gang

The problem or flaw with the argument is that he is saying

We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

So he is ruling out every other option. Why though? What in the argument states that another plan couldn't work either? Why is his plan the only one to solve the problem?
What if there were other ways to reduce expenditures in another plan?

Therefore in B, he is confusing what could be an adequate solution to a required solution (ONLY is key here)



Good explanation. I have gone for E, but now I think B is the correct one.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 247
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2011, 07:42
Was confused between B and E. Read the explanations. B makes sense.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1041
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2011, 23:19
Reasoning is perfect.
Conclusion is flawed. Hence look for the option which mentions about the flaw in conclusion.

B perfectly fits and mentions this flaw.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 468
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2011, 02:19
B in 1:08 min , this is as simple as it gets. i dont think gmat will throw questions which are this easy.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 50
Location: Hyderabad, India
WE 1: Deloitte 3 yrs
WE 2: Prok going on
Re: CR 30: Commisioner  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2011, 02:45
2
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds



Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds,

SO it is stated that there is no feasible way to increase available funds, choice E is not right. We cannot select what is already stated, and so not a flaw.

our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars

So the only way is to decrease expenditures. There can be various plans to decrease expenditure and one of them (adequate plan) was presented by him.

We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

Here is the problem, flaw is in this sentence. This plan is not the only plan, there can be many other plans that can lead to a saving of billion dollar. SO B is correct.
_________________

Akhil Mittal

I have not failed. I've just found 10000 ways that won't work. Thomas A. Edison

If my post was helpful to you then encourage me by your kudos :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2011
Posts: 34
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2012, 14:36
I thought it was A because the Q ask's how is the argument flawed, and well A could be a possible solution because the commissioner is basing his solution on information that is forecasted that is not necessarily 100% true. I mean I guess i could see B being the answer sorta....... I dunno, anytime I come here to the forums and read the solution I sorta understand it but the material doesn't really sink in unless its SC or Quant.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 114
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2012, 20:39
IMO B......

I couldn't rule out be other all options can be proved to be wrong
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 151
Location: Poland
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Apr 2013, 14:21
I solved it right, but used different reasoning than the one proposed here. I wasn't thinking that he is ruling out all the other ways by using the word "only". In my opinion, the B) isn't hinged on that fact, E) is somehow more.

Instead, I asked who said that the whole one billion has to be recovered? This is the difference which the B) tells us about - the difference between an adequate solution (regaining the whole one billion which would be just perfect) and the required solution (maybe it would be enough to recoup 50% of the shortfall next year? If YES, the whole argument falls apart).

Why not E)? I think that because E) reads "there is no way to increase...", and the Commissioner says that "there is no feasible way to increase...". Besides, the flaw appointed in B) trumps the one in E), as with E) true, the argument remains valid (the problem still exists), and with B) true, it does not.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1028
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Apr 2013, 16:32
HumptyDumpty wrote:
Instead, I asked who said that the whole one billion has to be recovered? This is the difference which the B) tells us about - the difference between an adequate solution (regaining the whole one billion which would be just perfect) and the required solution (maybe it would be enough to recoup 50% of the shortfall next year? If YES, the whole argument falls apart).


@HumptyDumpty
Interesting way of thinking. Your approach is Out Of The Box. I like it.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 104
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: Merage '15 (A)
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Apr 2013, 00:26
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain. the information has some credibility
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution. By reducing expenditure the revenue may plummet. it is not addressed
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts. it relies but often we rely on experts opinion, and the reasoning is sound to some extent
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague. language is clear
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds. looks alike a possible answer, but option B is more precise.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 157
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2013, 01:03
We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

The word "only" was the trigger for me to choose b.

Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year.

Notice the use of feasible twice. So cant it be safely assumed that requisite feasibility studies have been conducted and it is not taking for granted that that there is no way to raise the funds? Thereby making it easy to rule out e?
_________________

You've been walking the ocean's edge, holding up your robes to keep them dry. You must dive naked under, and deeper under, a thousand times deeper! - Rumi

http://www.manhattangmat.com/blog/index.php/author/cbermanmanhattanprep-com/ - This is worth its weight in gold

Economist GMAT Test - 730, Q50, V41 Aug 9th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 670, Q45, V36 Aug 11th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 680, Q47, V36 Aug 17th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 1 - 770, Q50, V44 Aug 24th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 690, Q45, V39 Aug 30th, 2013
Manhattan GMAT Test - 710, Q48, V39 Sep 13th, 2013
GmatPrep CAT 2 - 740, Q49, V41 Oct 6th, 2013

GMAT - 770, Q50, V44, Oct 7th, 2013
My Debrief - http://gmatclub.com/forum/from-the-ashes-thou-shall-rise-770-q-50-v-44-awa-5-ir-162299.html#p1284542

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 100
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2013, 06:55
A) relies on information that is far from certain no proof in the passage rearding this
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution.
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts.no proof that reliance is inappropriate
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague. can never be a reason of flaw
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds. Its a fact that is mentioend, cant challenge the premise

only left is B, very confusing though otherwise.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Posts: 4
Location: United States
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V41
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Apr 2015, 18:12
B for me as well.
E is already made as a fact by the Commissioner.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 11
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.57
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2016, 10:07
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds



B for me.

Explanation: Here the forecast is a Billion Dollar shortfall and the plan outlined is for expenditure cuts that would yield exactly billion dollars, where either of those might differ. The assumption is that the cuts are absolutely necessary to overcome the shortfall. Hence, the commissioner is confused for the expenditure cuts as a definitely required solution rather than being an adequate solution.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 19 Jul 2012
Posts: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V32
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V32
GPA: 3.6
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Oct 2016, 20:36
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds


So we all agree to have the choices down to B & E.
Thought process
Revenue forecast drop of billion dollars
Cuts will yield savings to offset the problem
This is one plan , other plans may involve finding root cause of forecast of a drop and solve the problem.
without ruling out other possibilities , author says this is the only solution
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 632
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jul 2018, 05:05
sondenso wrote:
jingy77 wrote:
E is the only one that makes sense to me. They are ruling out all factors that there can be anyway to increase funds. I have no idea though.


Agree with you, E

Because the argument "E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds", "This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed". We do not must find the flaw of the argument.


E is wrong . Commissioner is saying that there is only one way to get it done. that is using the provided plan.
E is says, Commissioner is saying THERE IS NO WAY TO GET AWAY FROM THIS LOSS.

Hope you get it.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall &nbs [#permalink] 10 Jul 2018, 05:05

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 37 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.