Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 15:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Posts: 217
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 8

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2010, 12:29
prasannar wrote:
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
B

I will go with B

it is the only option which talks about the solution .........whether adequate or required
_________________

Success is my Destiny

Manager
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 223
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2010, 09:06
what is wrong with E>?
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 170
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2010, 05:57
I still feel its E
_________________

R E S P E C T

Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 315
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2010, 10:30
It is clearly stated that "Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds".....So that eliminates E from the choice!
Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2010, 22:21
big debate between B and E

E takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds, which acording to me cannot be a flaw because there may be or may not be another way to increase available funds.
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 00:19
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 146
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2010, 19:56
B.suffecient vs necessary condition
Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 315
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 35

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2010, 14:42
B
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 79
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2010, 10:03
I will go with B

Forecasters forecasting is possibility ---> need adequate solution if problem comes but he is giivng required solution when problem actually exists .
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 226
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 280 [0], given: 21

### Show Tags

07 Nov 2010, 04:43
Solution should provide the way out in which, decrease in expenditure should outstrip the revenue shortfall .
But in his solution there is nothing which can convince us for that.Hence answer is B
_________________

Consider KUDOS if You find it good

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 289
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT Date: 08-27-2012
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 11:31
i ll go with B.

_________________

kudos me if you like my post.

Attitude determine everything.
all the best and God bless you.

Manager
Status: A continuous journey of self-improvement is essential for every person -Socrates
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 14

### Show Tags

30 Mar 2011, 22:25
terp26 wrote:
im joining th B gang

The problem or flaw with the argument is that he is saying

We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

So he is ruling out every other option. Why though? What in the argument states that another plan couldn't work either? Why is his plan the only one to solve the problem?
What if there were other ways to reduce expenditures in another plan?

Therefore in B, he is confusing what could be an adequate solution to a required solution (ONLY is key here)

Good explanation. I have gone for E, but now I think B is the correct one.
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 291
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 May 2011, 08:42
Was confused between B and E. Read the explanations. B makes sense.
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me KUDOS!

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1333
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 254 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

13 May 2011, 00:19
Reasoning is perfect.
Conclusion is flawed. Hence look for the option which mentions about the flaw in conclusion.

B perfectly fits and mentions this flaw.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 631
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 241 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

13 May 2011, 03:19
B in 1:08 min , this is as simple as it gets. i dont think gmat will throw questions which are this easy.
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2011
Posts: 38
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 11

Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2012, 15:36
I thought it was A because the Q ask's how is the argument flawed, and well A could be a possible solution because the commissioner is basing his solution on information that is forecasted that is not necessarily 100% true. I mean I guess i could see B being the answer sorta....... I dunno, anytime I come here to the forums and read the solution I sorta understand it but the material doesn't really sink in unless its SC or Quant.
Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 184
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 6

Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2012, 21:39
IMO B......

I couldn't rule out be other all options can be proved to be wrong
Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 160
Location: Poland
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 67

Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2013, 15:21
I solved it right, but used different reasoning than the one proposed here. I wasn't thinking that he is ruling out all the other ways by using the word "only". In my opinion, the B) isn't hinged on that fact, E) is somehow more.

Instead, I asked who said that the whole one billion has to be recovered? This is the difference which the B) tells us about - the difference between an adequate solution (regaining the whole one billion which would be just perfect) and the required solution (maybe it would be enough to recoup 50% of the shortfall next year? If YES, the whole argument falls apart).

Why not E)? I think that because E) reads "there is no way to increase...", and the Commissioner says that "there is no feasible way to increase...". Besides, the flaw appointed in B) trumps the one in E), as with E) true, the argument remains valid (the problem still exists), and with B) true, it does not.

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1132
Location: United States
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 3114 [0], given: 123

Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2013, 17:32
HumptyDumpty wrote:
Instead, I asked who said that the whole one billion has to be recovered? This is the difference which the B) tells us about - the difference between an adequate solution (regaining the whole one billion which would be just perfect) and the required solution (maybe it would be enough to recoup 50% of the shortfall next year? If YES, the whole argument falls apart).

@HumptyDumpty
Interesting way of thinking. Your approach is Out Of The Box. I like it.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 110
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: Merage '15 (A)
GPA: 3.6
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 22

Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Apr 2013, 01:26
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain. the information has some credibility
(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution. By reducing expenditure the revenue may plummet. it is not addressed
(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts. it relies but often we rely on experts opinion, and the reasoning is sound to some extent
(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague. language is clear
(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds. looks alike a possible answer, but option B is more precise.
Re: Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall   [#permalink] 18 Apr 2013, 01:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 47 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Springfield Fire Commissioner: 0 21 Jan 2017, 21:52
Springfield Fire Commissioner: 0 21 Dec 2015, 01:59
The commissioner of a professional sports league dictated 1 12 Oct 2012, 10:50
28 Environmentalist: The commissioner of the Fish and Game 18 25 Aug 2016, 05:51
1 Springfield Fire Commissioner: the vast majority of false 9 21 Apr 2014, 04:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by