It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 15:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 03:23
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years.

A) forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years
B)that forbids state and local governments for the next three years from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
C)that for the next three years forbids state and local governments to raise taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
D)forbidding for the next three years to state and local governments the raising of taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
E)that forbids for the next three years state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet

I do not agree with the answer or may beI am missing something. Let's discuss and I will post the OA

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 05:10
spider wrote:
aaron22197 wrote:
What's wrong wit B ?

Forbid to is the right Idiom - Clear C!!

Yeah it's a test of idiom 'forbid to' not forbid from or forbid for.

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1258

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 06:23
How to remember all the idioms?
spider wrote:
aaron22197 wrote:
What's wrong wit B ?

Forbid to is the right Idiom - Clear C!!

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 06:32
aaron22197 wrote:
Congress has enacted legislation forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years.

A) forbidding state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet for the next three years
-- present progressive tense is not required. also, the modifying phrase is incorrectly placed.
B)that forbids state and local governments for the next three years from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
--forbids X from raising Y - Use of present progressive tense in "raising" is appropriate.
C)that for the next three years forbids state and local governments to raise taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
--forbids X to raise Y -- "to raise" doesn't seem appropriate.
D)forbidding for the next three years to state and local governments the raising of taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
-- present progressive tense is not required.
E)that forbids for the next three years state and local governments from raising taxes on connections that link consumers to the Internet
--verb forbids takes a direct object therefore here the usage is incorrect.
I do not agree with the answer or may beI am missing something. Let's discuss and I will post the OA

Thanks for posting a good question. IMO the answer is (b)
also, can anyone suggest whether the following are idiomatic-
1.forbids X to raise Y
2.forbids X from raising Y

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 17:24
The idiom is "forbid to".
All of the other choices use "forbid for" or "forbid from".

So its C.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 111

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 0

Location: São Paulo

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 17:41
1
KUDOS
According to the Oxford Dictionary, BOTH idioms are correct:

for•bid /fbd; NAmE frb/ verb (for•bade /fbd; fbed; NAmE frb/ for•bid•den /fbdn; NAmE frb/)
1 ~ sb (from doing sth) to order sb not to do sth; to order that sth must not be done: [vn] He forbade them from mentioning the subject again. Her father forbade the marriage. [vn to inf] You are all forbidden to leave.

Consulting teh MGMAT Sentence Correction Guide, it says that the GMAT "prefers" the idiom Forbid to.

But attention: you you prefer useing prohibit, only from is correct.

Kudos [?]: 7 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1881

Kudos [?]: 1403 [1], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 18:44
1
KUDOS
ldpedroso wrote:
Consulting teh MGMAT Sentence Correction Guide, it says that the GMAT "prefers" the idiom Forbid to

I think it is not because "preference" here, it is, you pay attention to the movement of modifier "for the next three years", you will see what I mean!
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1403 [1], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Jun 2008, 19:45
sondenso wrote:
ldpedroso wrote:
Consulting teh MGMAT Sentence Correction Guide, it says that the GMAT "prefers" the idiom Forbid to

I think it is not because "preference" here, it is, you pay attention to the movement of modifier "for the next three years", you will see what I mean!

agreed. it uses the unidiomatic "forbid for" instead of "forbid from".
thanks ldpedroso +1
n sondenso+1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Re: SC- 700 Level   [#permalink] 10 Jun 2008, 19:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by