It is currently 19 Jan 2018, 01:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 565 [2], given: 6

Location: Manchester UK
Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2009, 05:37
2
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:03) correct 33% (00:55) wrong based on 755 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 565 [2], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2009, 06:03
Option B is conditional..pls note "if" in the sentence...
A.Seems to be awkward construction.
D.Use of plural verb for singular subject.
IMO C is more appropriate...pls post OA?

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 6

Location: Manchester UK
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Oct 2009, 10:35
OA is A

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 74

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2009, 04:06
wts wrong in C..?
sagarsabnis: Cud u pls post the explainations ?

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5528

Kudos [?]: 6429 [2], given: 122

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2009, 04:20
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
A
as i see , c has wrong pronoun usage... them for an applicant
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

BANGALORE/-

Kudos [?]: 6429 [2], given: 122

Director
Joined: 01 Apr 2008
Posts: 872

Kudos [?]: 884 [1], given: 18

Name: Ronak Amin
Schools: IIM Lucknow (IPMX) - Class of 2014
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2009, 05:15
1
KUDOS
sagarsabnis wrote:
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
whats wrong in B???

The drugs are not the grounds for rejecting an applicant...the 'usage' of drugs by an applicant is a problem for the chief

Kudos [?]: 884 [1], given: 18

Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 6

Location: Manchester UK
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Oct 2009, 13:42
@talk2pk even i dont know the explanation hence I posted it

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2009
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 3

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Oct 2009, 06:46
talk2pk wrote:
wts wrong in C..?
sagarsabnis: Cud u pls post the explainations ?

The biggiest problem in C is that it uses pronoun 'them' to refer to antecedent of possessive form 'an applicant's'. In addition, 'them' is wrong to refer to singular antecedent.

(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them

Kudos [?]: 196 [0], given: 3

Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 92

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2009, 00:47
I went for E...I realissed the problem with E is the modifier...
E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them...
Bold part must refer to applicant and not to applicant's usage....
Am i right in interpretting this?

Regards,

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2009, 20:17
sagarsabnis wrote:
960. Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

Recommended falls under subjunctive category. So "should" is incorrect usage. Be is sufficient. Check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjunctive_mood

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2009
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 89 [2], given: 1

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Nov 2009, 10:48
2
KUDOS
(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
CORRECT
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
"ANY USE OF DRUG" AND NOT "THE DRUG" SHOULD BE GROUNDS FOR BLAH BLAH BLAH.
"APPLYING FOR A JOB" SHOULD BE "APPLICATION FOR A JOB"
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEM IS INCORRECT
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEY IS INCORRECT
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them
SUBJECT VERB AGRREMENT PROBLEM
AN APPLICANTS USE/ THEM IS INCORRECT

Kudos [?]: 89 [2], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 21 Oct 2010
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 06:13
1
KUDOS
It`s A.

B is not the answer, because the USE is the subject of the sentence.
C is not correct, since applicant`s is Singular, while THEM is plural
D is not chosen for the same reason as C + the Verb is not used in the correct form
E - the same as C + wrong modifier placement

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 100 [7], given: 18

Location: Finland
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 06:15
7
KUDOS
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

The answer is A.
From the statement we can clearly make out that its a case of command subjunctive, which calls for the use of "that" and "be".
B- Incorrect: Never use "should" in command subjunctive.
C- Incorrect: Disagreement between pronoun and number. The pronoun should be "his or her".
D- Incorrect: Same as C. The pronoun "they" is outright wrong in this context.
E- Incorrect: Same as C, and D. The use of the pronoun "them" is wrong.
A correctly maintains the command subjunctive form.

Consider giving kudos if you like this explanation

Kudos [?]: 100 [7], given: 18

Manager
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 398 [1], given: 16

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 06:58
1
KUDOS
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

+1 A
C,D,E refer to "an" applicant as them (noun-antecedent error)
B is awkward for various reason ( subject is drug and not the use of drugs, "should" changes the meaning etc) cannt be 100% what the error is for B but i eliminated it due to "awkardness"

Kudos [?]: 398 [1], given: 16

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 253

Kudos [?]: 107 [1], given: 9

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 07:24
1
KUDOS
Nice question. C, D and E can be eliminated for pronoun error. All these sentences use possesive noun (applicant's) and they, them cannot refer to him
_________________

If you like my post, consider giving me some KUDOS !!!!! Like you I need them

Kudos [?]: 107 [1], given: 9

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 484

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 149

WE 1: 4 years Tech
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 07:36
talk2pk wrote:
wts wrong in C..?
sagarsabnis: Cud u pls post the explainations ?

Recommend is a command subjunctive and requires the bare form of the verb "be" according to MGMAT sc strategy guide.
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 149

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1623

Kudos [?]: 1154 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 08:05
+1 A
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1154 [0], given: 109

Manager
Status: I rest, I rust.
Joined: 04 Oct 2010
Posts: 121

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 9

Schools: ISB - Co 2013
WE 1: IT Professional since 2006
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 10:35
sagarsabnis wrote:
Constance Horner, chief of the United States government’s personnel agency, has recommended that the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant.

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(B) any dangerous or illegal drug, if used in the five years prior to applying for a job, should be grounds for not hiring an applicant
(C) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds not to hire them
(D) an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to applying for a job are grounds that they not be hired
(E) for five years prior to applying for a job, an applicant’s use of any dangerous or illegal drug be grounds for not hiring them

whats wrong in B???

Nice question, took me a while to get around it.
C, D and E may be rejected straight away; all three of them have "...an applicant...they/them...".
B voilates the format of command subjunctive. Left with A.
_________________

Respect,
Vaibhav

PS: Correct me if I am wrong.

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 13 Apr 2010
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 46 [2], given: 25

Location: singapore
Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2010, 15:55
2
KUDOS
The sentence is subjunctive mood.

So "should be "....is incorrect ...B is out

Ans C & E contain "them" doesn't have antecedent

"D " contains incorrect idiom "grounds"

Correct idiom "grounds...for"
_________________

Regards,
Nagesh
My GMAT Study Plan: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-gmat-study-plan-112833.html
Idioms List : http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-idioms-104283.html?hilit=idioms#p813231
--------------------------------------
Consider Kudos if you like my posts

Last edited by nageshshiv on 12 Nov 2010, 20:14, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 46 [2], given: 25

Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2010
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2010, 18:29
hold the party Phantoms!

(A) the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job be grounds for not hiring an applicant

the use of any dangerous or illegal drug in the five years prior to application for a job

does this mean that anyone uses in this universe uses "crack" and the poor applicant gets screwed?

tell me that "A" is the best out of the (bad) lot.... i'll agree!

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 11

Re: Constance Horner, chief of the United States   [#permalink] 12 Nov 2010, 18:29

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 31 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Constance Horner, chief of the United States governments

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.