It is currently 12 Dec 2017, 21:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

3 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 298

Kudos [?]: 594 [3], given: 1474

Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2016, 09:10
3
This post received
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (01:19) correct 55% (01:26) wrong based on 340 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enrolled your employees in my weeklong training seminar that is specifically designed for your business.

Software Company Executive: Your seminars are poorly designed and a waste of money. Since 2005, the companies in my industry that have enrolled employees in your seminar have revenues that are considerably lower than those who have not enrolled employees in your seminar.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the executive’s response to the consultant?

A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

KUDO me plenty

Kudos [?]: 594 [3], given: 1474

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 391

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
GPA: 1.9
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2016, 10:29
shasadou wrote:
Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enrolled your employees in my weeklong training seminar that is specifically designed for your business.

Software Company Executive: Your seminars are poorly designed and a waste of money. Since 2005, the companies in my industry that have enrolled employees in your seminar have revenues that are considerably lower than those who have not enrolled employees in your seminar.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the executive’s response to the consultant?

A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.



I think B is actually supporting the executive. Please someone clarify.

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 391

SC Moderator
User avatar
P
Joined: 13 Apr 2015
Posts: 1507

Kudos [?]: 1226 [0], given: 896

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2016, 10:56
robu wrote:
shasadou wrote:
Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enrolled your employees in my weeklong training seminar that is specifically designed for your business.

Software Company Executive: Your seminars are poorly designed and a waste of money. Since 2005, the companies in my industry that have enrolled employees in your seminar have revenues that are considerably lower than those who have not enrolled employees in your seminar.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the executive’s response to the consultant?

A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.



I think B is actually supporting the executive. Please someone clarify.


Executive's response: Companies that have not enrolled their employees in seminars are having better revenues. Enrollment in seminars result in lower revenues.

Possible Weakener: If the companies that did not enroll their employees in seminars already had higher revenues, then lower revenues in other companies (that enrolled for seminars) cannot be attributed to seminars. The companies that enrolled for the seminars already had lower revenues that the companies that did not enroll.

B aligns to our assumed weakener.

Kudos [?]: 1226 [0], given: 896

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2016, 18:39
Option A says that 95% of companies reported "increase" in revenue. Consultant argued that there will be "considerable increase" in company's revenue if the employees will attend his seminar. So, A does not weaken the argument as much B is doing.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 18 Sep 2015
Posts: 109

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 612

GMAT 1: 610 Q43 V31
GMAT 2: 610 Q47 V27
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 4: 700 Q49 V35
WE: Project Management (Health Care)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2016, 23:10
1
This post received
KUDOS
shasadou wrote:
Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enrolled your employees in my weeklong training seminar that is specifically designed for your business.

Software Company Executive: Your seminars are poorly designed and a waste of money. Since 2005, the companies in my industry that have enrolled employees in your seminar have revenues that are considerably lower than those who have not enrolled employees in your seminar.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the executive’s response to the consultant?

A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.


Conclusion Consultant: Program -> Revnue+
Conclusion SCE: Program -> Does not work (since it's a waist of money)
Premise SCE: revenue for employees who took the seminar is lower than for those who did not took it.

Assumption: seminar is correlated with low profits; (A causality might be implied that seminar -> low profits).

Strategy:
- We need something to weaken the correlation (x response to the same value of y might be different).
- If we thinners' of the causality, showing the following might help ( assume Program =x, Low profits = y):
1. y ->X
2. Z (other factor) ->X
3. Y happens without X / X happens without Y before it


Elimination Process:
A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
- 95% of the companies might not even be in the software industry. So this answer might weaken, but this not a must.
- Lets keep it in the meanwhile.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
- understanding the implied implications is tricky.
- So we can take 2 extreme cases to understand the meaning in the context of the given stimulus.
- case 1: assume that most of the cases prior to 2005, that were small to begin with, enrolled into the consultant's seminar.
- This might mean that the reason for the big difference is not the seminar but the size of the company. (meaning we found a z->x).
- Case 2: assume the most companioned were big companies, this means that the companies start with a lot of revenue and then the consultants seminar might have indeed lower the companies' revenues.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
- Overall sales might come from a group of companies in the relevant software industry that might not be relevant to the mentioned comparison.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
- not relevant to the assumptions.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.
- This strengthens the consultants argument.

Kudos [?]: 36 [1], given: 612

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2016
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 54 [1], given: 21

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
GPA: 3.94
WE: Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2016, 08:38
1
This post received
KUDOS
My first answer post to a CR question. Hope I can be of some help.

I attempted this question in on of Veritas Practice Tests. The passage is not a complex one. As many have pointed out earlier the premises are as below:
Consultant's Premise: Program enrolment -> increase in revenue
Company Exec's Premise: Companies that enrolled had considerably lower revenues. (NOTE: He mentions lower revenue, the revenues could have still increased but the numerical value was low.)

Company exec's conclusion: The program is a waste of money.

Possible Weakener's could introduce new information suggesting the company official did not know most companies that benefited. A second weakener could be that the companies did benefit, but they were very small companies so even say registering significant revenue increase didn't make them compete with their larger counterparts.

Example: Think of 2 companies - A and B. A had a revenue of 100 million in 2004, B had 1 million. Now the exec's program - say helped company B to register a 100% profit. Still it would be at 2 million, significantly smaller than company A as suggested by the executive. But that doesn't mean that the consultant's program is useless. It is this weakener that has been presented in answer choice B.

POE

(A) A very important information that I used here to eliminate this choice was the year 2005. This choice, though looks very attractive, doesn't provide any detail on the year, so in the absence of that info, we can't really consider this as a good weakener. Suppose 95% companies reported revenue increase in the year 2000. But the executive specifically bases the info on 2005, so 95% companies registering higher revenue in 2000 would really not weaken the executive's argument.
(B) This is the correct choice based on the pre-thinking above.
(C) This actually strengthens the company executive's argument
(D) The argument is about revenue, not profit. So cost becomes irrelevant information.
(E) This strengthens the company executive's argument.

Hope this helps.

Cheers!
_________________

If you think this post was helpful, please provide Kudos! Cheers!!!

Kudos [?]: 54 [1], given: 21

Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3106

Kudos [?]: 1144 [0], given: 327

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Oct 2016, 10:38
shasadou wrote:
Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enrolled your employees in my weeklong training seminar that is specifically designed for your business.

Software Company Executive: Your seminars are poorly designed and a waste of money. Since 2005, the companies in my industry that have enrolled employees in your seminar have revenues that are considerably lower than those who have not enrolled employees in your seminar.

Which of the following most seriously weakens the executive’s response to the consultant?

A. 95% of the companies that enroll in the consultant’s seminar report that their revenues have increased.
B. Most of the software companies that had high revenues prior to 2005 did not enroll in the consultant’s seminar.
C. Overall sales of software since 2005 have increased dramatically.
D. The cost of developing and producing software has decreased since 2005.
E. The majority of software companies that sent employees to the consultant’s seminar have experienced a drop in revenue since 2005.


No doubt with the OA...

The Executive reasons that the programmes of the company are a waste of money and reasons that companies who have enrolled have resulted in decrease in revenues after attending the programme..

(A) Strengthens the claims of the software consultant.
(C) Revenue = Quantity Sold x Price per unit...
An increase in Sales of has been stated here , however we are talking about revenue increase/decrease...
(D) Out of scope and irrelevant
(E) This option strengthens the views of the Executive...

(B) If only companies to send employees to the training were those who were having problem with decreased revenues , the it weakens the reasoning of the executive....

Hence answer will be (B)

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1144 [0], given: 327

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 181

Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 660 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.68
Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 17:43
really well made question.

A can be a weakner

But B is the most suitable.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 181

Re: Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro   [#permalink] 09 Nov 2017, 17:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Consultant: Your total revenue would increase considerably if you enro

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.