GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 07 Dec 2019, 20:29

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 462
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2018, 05:16
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

Thanks
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4471

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2018, 15:13
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond.

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2017
Posts: 56

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2018, 15:47
IMO OA is C

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
-> This is a lure sentence. But! You have to think about a word 'some'. Because of the word 'some', this sentence is just one kind of fact.
So it cannot be an assumption.
(B) Washing machines of a given type should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
-> Nothing.
(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
-> Correct. If not C, we have to think another factors between top-loading washing machines and front-loaders.
(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for people who do not use wheelchairs.
-> This is just one kind of fact.
(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for people who are not wheelchair users.
-> This is just one kind of fact.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 462
Location: India
Schools: XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.5

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2018, 10:41
mikemcgarry wrote:
hellosanthosh2k2 wrote:
Hi,

I feel, had the choice C read as "For some consumers, convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior", it would have been an apt choice. I feel "only" is making it too strong.

Thanks

Dear hellosanthosh2k2,

I'm happy to respond.

I agree that the "only" makes (C) stand out as strong, and that's precisely the point. That's part of why it works as an answer.

You see, the argument itself is a relatively weak argument. This prompt argument easily could have been the prompt for a "weaken the argument" question.

Notice that the negation of (C) would be a devastating objection to this argument, and the Negation Test is one of the strongest for an assumption.

The fact that (C) is a laughably extreme statement and yet the assumption of the argument casts tremendous doubt on the validity of the argument. If Person #1 made the prompt argument, and then Person #2 said, "So, it seems you are assuming that . . ." and then said (C), this would be a brilliantly understated yet devastating objection to the argument. The extremity of (C) perfectly brings out the flimsy weakness of the prompt argument.

Does all this make sense?
Mike

Hi mikemcgarry, thanks for detailed explanation. It makes sense
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 3

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2018, 01:04
THE OFFICIAL ANSWER OF THIS QUESTION IS CHOICE A.
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2017
Posts: 3

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2018, 01:11
Reason for why choice C is wrong:

In order for the conclusion to be true, an assumption MUST be true.

Let's say if choice C not true, i.e Convenience is not the only factor to determine superiority.

The conclusion may still valid. Thus choice C cannot be the assumption.

ONLY CHOICE A IS CORRECT ANSWER. I am damn sure.
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 17
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V41

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2019, 21:45
sayantanc2k

I do not understand how C is correct .

Gap: there is no info provided that shows the connection between inconvenience and superiority .

C says , convenience is the only reason for judging superiority

IS this a MUST ? can it not be subjective ? can i not find something superior to the other because i find one aspect more important than the other ?
can it not be judged by making a total of all the points given to a list of factors ?

A allows for all the above .
A says for some convenience is the most important factor and thus gives a link as to why for some front loader are better , while also allowing for other factors to be as more important for the people who are not in the wheel chair .

i do not understand how option A is only a reiteration of what is already in the passage as , A provides the link between convenience and superiority ( not blatantly provided in the stimulus)

would be thank full if you could help me understand this
Intern
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 17
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21
GMAT 1: 690 Q42 V41

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2019, 01:12
VeritasPrepBrian wrote:
As a few people pointed out, the LSAT forums all have the correct answer to this one as A, which makes a lot of sense because:

-Rarely (I won't say "never" when discussing Critical Reasoning!) do you ever need a word like "all," or "only" in an assumption answer. The correct answer is a necessary assumption - without it the argument falls apart. Here what if convenience isn't the ONLY factor but instead just the MOST IMPORTANT factor. That's different from C, but the conclusion is just as strong at that point. And you don't even need "most important" - it could be one of several important factors, and for some people it will weigh heavier than the others and the conclusion still holds. The negation of C is "Convenience is NOT the only important factor in determining superiority" and that doesn't cripple the argument at all.

Makes Perfect sense and resonates with my reasoning for eliminating C and choosing A.
thanks a million
Manager
Joined: 21 May 2017
Posts: 99
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31

### Show Tags

05 May 2019, 05:16
Hi Experts

Is choice C incorrect because it is a generic statement which includes entire population that uses top/front loading washing machine, and "only" makes it too strong as we are not aware what other factors are taken into consideration while selection one over the other??
I rejected it based on above thoughts.
Please let me know if I
Intern
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 43

### Show Tags

06 May 2019, 17:08
why cant ans be E

it states that non wheel chair will find it inconvinient in removing cloth from front loader

so front loader is prefered by some

why assumption is wrong
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 234

### Show Tags

06 May 2019, 18:54

Can you please tell which option is the correct answer here ? Option A or option C ? There seems to be a diffrence in opinion among people over this question. Can you please help ?

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 8285

### Show Tags

06 May 2019, 20:09
sayan640 wrote:

Can you please tell which option is the correct answer here ? Option A or option C ? There seems to be a diffrence in opinion among people over this question. Can you please help ?

Posted from my mobile device

Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing machines are superior overall to front-loaders. But front-loaders have the controls and access in front. This is more convenient for wheelchair users, some of whom find it highly inconvenient to remove laundry from top-loaders. So for some consumers front-loaders are superior.

Let us first look at the argument to answer
Argument : Top loaders are superior as per a study -->> People using wheel chairs find front loaders more convenient ---->> So, for some consumers front-loaders are superior.

I think it is very clear from the flow of the argument that the ASSUMPTION should connect convenience of these few consumers to superiority.

So, A should be the answer and C does not come close to this choice.

Let us check on A and C

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the consumer advocate’s argument depends?

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
Firstly it is NOT a premise but a very valid assumption. It connects few consumers convenience to the superiority of that machine.
Thus, we are not generalizing the taste of people, and just concentrating on this particular group. As a matter of fact, this choice contains the information of choice C, but without generalizing everyone.

(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
Yes, if this were an assumption, the argument will surely stand,
but if this choice were that convenience for some consumers is the only important factor, that too will be sufficient.
Also, if this choice were that convenience for some consumers is one of the most important factor, that too will be sufficient.

So, it is too extreme, and the argument will stand even if we say xyz is the most important factor. It leaves room for other factors and yet be sufficient.

So, I would go with A.
_________________
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9850
Location: Pune, India

### Show Tags

08 May 2019, 01:30
rulez161 wrote:
Consumer advocate: A recent study concluded that top-loading washing machines are superior overall to front-loaders. But front-loaders have the controls and access in front. This is more convenient for wheelchair users, some of whom find it highly inconvenient to remove laundry from top-loaders. So for some consumers front-loaders are superior.

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the consumer advocate’s argument depends?

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
(B) Washing machines of a given type should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for people who do not use wheelchairs.
(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for people who are not wheelchair users.

The moment I read the argument, my first question was that what if the other features of top loading outweigh convenience? Just because of convenience, we cannot establish superiority.
The argument assumes that for these specific consumers, convenience outweighs the advantages of top loaders. What if the top loaders save a lot of money and the wheelchair users find that more appealing than inconvenience? Then our conclusion cannot hold.

(A) For some consumers the convenience of frontloaders outweighs the advantages of toploaders in assessing which is superior.
Correct. This has been assumed by the argument.

(B) Washing machines of a given type should be compared only with washing machines of that type.
Irrelevant.

(C) Convenience is the only important factor in determining which type of washing machine is superior.
Not necessary. There can be other important factors too. The conclusion will still hold as long as convenience outweighs others i.e. as long as convenience is the most important. Convenience need not be the ONLY important factor.

(D) Retrieving clothes from a top-loader is convenient for people who do not use wheelchairs.
Irrelevant

(E) Retrieving clothes from front-loaders is inconvenient for people who are not wheelchair users.
Irrelevant

_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 277

### Show Tags

08 May 2019, 03:44
Ankita5330 wrote:
A recent study concluded that

If it is saying about overall superiority.There must be multiple factors. Hence C is not correct.
i.e
(C) Convenience is the only important factor in
determining which type of washing machine
is superior.

Answer choice (C) is too extreme. We cannot assume that convenience is the only factor required to assess the superiority of a washing machine. Maybe convenience is one of the many factors wheelchair users consider or maybe convenience is not the most important factor for non-wheelchair users. The point is that we don't know and therefore should not make any assumptions about this. Even if there are many factors, but convenience is most important then also a user will chose convenient choice.

Also note that answer choice (C) is general and does not mention a particular group of people like wheelchair users, non-wheelchair users or just some consumers.
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Jan 2019
Posts: 277

### Show Tags

08 May 2019, 03:48
GMATMasterBlaster wrote:
Reason for why choice C is wrong:

In order for the conclusion to be true, an assumption MUST be true.

Let's say if choice C not true, i.e Convenience is not the only factor to determine superiority.

The conclusion may still valid. Thus choice C cannot be the assumption.

ONLY CHOICE A IS CORRECT ANSWER. I am damn sure.

Yes Exactly. What necessary in this case to make a choice based on convenience is that, convenience remain the most important factor. If that happen, then no matter how many factors are there, they won't change our choice.

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by