Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Feb 2017, 22:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 167
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Sep 2005, 11:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:00) correct 25% (03:37) wrong based on 5 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Consumer Advocate: It is generally true, at least in this state, that lawyers who advertise a specific service charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. It is also true that each time restrictions on the advertising of legal services have been eliminated, the number of lawyers advertising their services has increased and legal costs to consumers have declined in consequence. However, eliminating the state requirement that legal advertisements must specify fees for specific services would almost certainly increase rather than further reduce consumer's legal costs. Lawyers would no longer have an incentive to lower their fees when they begin advertising and if no longer required to specify fee arrangement, many lawyers who now advertise would increase their fees"

In the consumer advocate's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a generalization that the consumer advocate accepts as true; the second is presented as a consequence that follows from the truth of that generalization
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case of issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
(D) The first is evidence that the consumer advocate offers in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.
(E) The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the main position that the consumer advocate defends; the second is that position.
If you have any questions
New!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 366 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2005, 06:12
Going with B. Will explain more if I'm right.
Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2005
Posts: 142
Location: Fringes of the Boreal, Canada
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2005, 07:32
B looks good to me too.
Manager
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 167
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2005, 05:07
OA is C
Intern
Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2005, 10:07
Do you have OE pleae?
07 Sep 2005, 10:07
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 #Top150 CR: Public health advocate: It is generally true that 4 12 Oct 2015, 06:30
7 Consumer advocate 2 20 Sep 2015, 09:41
16 Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this st 19 12 May 2011, 07:25
42 Public health advocate: It is generally true that medication 17 12 Oct 2012, 20:49
Consumer advocate: it is generally true, at least in this 0 14 Jan 2014, 09:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by