It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 09:31

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 219

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 06:44
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.
(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving
(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give
(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given
(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give
(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Jamboree Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 934

Kudos [?]: 338 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 07:14
X enough to Y and So X as to Y are both correct idiom.
A is using wrong idiom.
Underlined part says "new spending patterns", which indicates that phenomenon still going on. So we need has tumbled and no tumbled.
The logic of the sentence requires to show a contract thereby but is preferable to and.
Only E fulfills all these conditions.

Kudos [?]: 338 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 07:34
IMO B. I think the verb tense should be parallel and to clearly indicate the meaning of the main clause we need an infinite form..

Kudos [?]: 268 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2007
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 08:45
I think B should be the answer. As there is no need of "has tumbled". simple past fits well

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 08:47
aaron22197 wrote:
Consumer confidence levels, which many economists consider an early indication of the economy’s direction, sagged as the stock market tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving a clear picture of new spending patterns.
(A) tumbled, but not dramatically enough for giving
(B) tumbled, but not dramatically enough to give
(C) tumbled, and not so dramatically as to have given
(D) has tumbled, and not dramatically enough to give
(E) has tumbled, but not so dramatically as to give

need to use 'to give'; sagged so tumbled.
B.

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 219

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2008, 09:25
To anser this question, you need to understand the difference b/w

X enough to Y - Here emphasis is on X
and
So X as to Y - Here emphasis is on Y

Both are correct idioms. However, In this SC, emphasis is on X (dramatically), Hence B is the answer.

OA is B

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

Re: SC-Consumer   [#permalink] 03 Aug 2008, 09:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by