Contradiction between Manhattan and OG??? : GMAT Quantitative Section
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 Feb 2017, 00:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Contradiction between Manhattan and OG???

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 176
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2010, 18:53
Hi,

in the EIV Manhattan book (p.94), it says that we cannot multiply or divide an inequality by a variable unless we know the sign of the variable.

For example,

If x/y<1, is x<y?

according to the EIV book, this question cannot be solved because if Y is positive, then yes x<y. However, if Y is negative, then X>Y (we flip the sign). as we don't know the sign of Y, we cannot know the answer.
This totally makes sense for me.

On the other hand, if we look at the OG edition 12 - DS - p.303 - Q#44

Robots X, Y & Z each assemble components at their respective constant rates. If Rx is the ratio of Robot X's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate and Ry is the ratio of Robot Y's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate, is Robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

1) Rx < Ry
2) Rx < 1

so the answer is C

1) tells us the X < Y
2) Here is what doesn't make sense for me. According to the explanation, since Ry <1 then Y< Z. this is because Ry = y/z < 1, so Y < Z. we don't know the sign of Z, so how can we know that it is Y < Z, not Y > Z???
the explanation assumes that Z is positive...why??

Thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 366
Schools: LBS, INSEAD, IMD, ISB - Anything with just 1 yr program.
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 22

Re: Contradiction between Manhattan and OG??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Mar 2010, 18:59
Sweet heart, give it another thought. Can rates of machines ever be negative? Of course, unless they are slowing down but that is not the situation in the problem. So when x, y, z are rates of three machines, X, Y, and Z, none of the rates can be negative.
_________________

I am AWESOME and it's gonna be LEGENDARY!!!

Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 177
Location: Singapore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 5

Re: Contradiction between Manhattan and OG??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2010, 01:09
don't discount common sense..
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 176
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 2

Re: Contradiction between Manhattan and OG??? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2010, 03:49
OMG

thank for your help!
i just freaked out when I read the explanation and thought there was something that I misunderstood

thank you guys
Re: Contradiction between Manhattan and OG???   [#permalink] 16 Mar 2010, 03:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Data sufficiency with statements that contradict 0 12 Dec 2016, 06:59
1 OG 1 19 Feb 2012, 08:52
1 OG probability 2 19 Feb 2012, 08:18
Og question 4 28 Mar 2011, 09:48
Manhattan GMAT Difficulty 3 01 Apr 2010, 09:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Contradiction between Manhattan and OG???

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.