It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 23:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central

Author Message
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 09:11
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorsâ€”such as foreign competitionâ€”beyond the control of American workers.

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 301

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 09:30
A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
this is still a validarg since they are basing increase in wage on size of pie allocated to workers rather than increase in overall size of pie
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry. [b]this is just a tread not valid arg to increase sal[/b]
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
[b]pop growth has nothign to do with increase in output or economic growth [/b]
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
being shelfish Has nothing to do with increase in salary
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factorsâ€”such as foreign competitionâ€”beyond the control of American workers.
Has nothing to do with increase in salary just an accusation

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 11:51
Thanks dude...the OA is A indeed.

But isnt E weakening as well by suggesting an alternate cause?...

Kudos [?]: 141 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 432

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

09 Nov 2006, 12:45
Hi Vineet, Please don't post OA so fast....its always good to have opinion of others as well......thanks...

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

09 Nov 2006, 12:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by