It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 06:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Feb 2017
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jun 2017, 01:30
I can't let go of D. It's beautifully stated the criticism in an analytical way. The percentage contribution might have increased due to the reduction in performance of Chemical division. So, 20% increase in value doesn't correspondingly represent the "growing stronger" - part of argument. When you allot values for percentages, you can easily see that. Hence, it is perfectly weakening it. Some help pls

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Math Forum Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 1494

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 71

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2017, 04:25
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation's profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation's profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.

On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

Boil it down - The pharmaceutical division is growing stronger since its % share of corporation's profits has increased from 20 to 45 %.
- It experienced ABSOLUTE growth ?
What if - the total profits of the entire corporation are down. The entire pie might be smaller and therefore the Pharma profits might stay the same and yet be a larger percentage of a smaller pie.

(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division's contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product. - Irrelevant - it does not dispute the claim that pharmaceutical division is growing stronger

(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation's profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals. - Irrelevant - we are concerned about this company only.

(C) The percentage of the corporation's profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division's performance had not improved. - Correct

(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before. - Incorrect - we are only concerned in comparing the last 2 years

(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each. - may be true, but its not the issue

Answer C
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Kudos [?]: 867 [0], given: 71

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 415

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 117

Re: Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2017, 08:00
karun_aggarwal wrote:
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation's profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation's profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.

On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division's contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product.

(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation's profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals.

(C) The percentage of the corporation's profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division's performance had not improved.

(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.

(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each.


@abhimanha please could you explain this one step by step?
Doesn't "critique" mean evaluation? Then why are we trying to weaken the question?

Regards

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 117

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 415

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 117

Re: Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Sep 2017, 08:02
Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for our chemical division, which has traditionally contributed about 60 percent of the corporation's profits. It is therefore encouraging that there is the following evidence that the pharmaceutical division is growing stronger: it contributed 45 percent of the corporation's profits, up from 20 percent the previous year.

On the basis of the facts stated, which of the following is the best critique of the evidence presented above?

(A) The increase in the pharmaceutical division's contribution to corporation profits could have resulted largely from the introduction of single, important new product.

(B) In multidivisional corporations that have pharmaceutical divisions, over half of the corporation's profits usually come from the pharmaceuticals.

(C) The percentage of the corporation's profits attributable to the pharmaceutical division could have increased even if that division's performance had not improved.

(D) The information cited does not make it possible to determine whether the 20 percent share of profits cited was itself an improvement over the year before.

(E) The information cited does not make it possible to compare the performance of the chemical and pharmaceutical divisions in of the percent of total profits attributable to each.

abhimahna
Please resolve my below query.
Doesn't "critique" mean evaluation? Then why are we trying to weaken the question?

Regards

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 117

Re: Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2017, 08:02

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   [ 44 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
8 Corporate officers and directors commonly buy and sell, for PUNEETSCHDV 5 24 Apr 2016, 11:37
Last year, there was only one fatality among people who skydive from HKD1710 2 24 Apr 2017, 21:18
25 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has LalaB 16 15 Sep 2017, 06:10
3 Due to budget constraints for the upcoming year, the corporate office Nevernevergiveup 4 28 Jan 2017, 03:19
34 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for feruz77 20 02 Jul 2017, 11:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Corporate Officer: Last year was an unusually poor one for

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.