It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 08:06

# STARTING SOON:

Live Chat with Cornell Adcoms in Main Chat Room  |  R1 Interview Invites: MIT Sloan Chat  |  UCLA Anderson Chat  |  Duke Fuqua Chat (EA Decisions)

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2004, 22:56
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (00:54) correct 50% (01:01) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I have a question regarding this problem which ask later on when I post the answer.

Ad: A leading economist has determined that among people who used computers at their place of employment last year, those who also owned laptop computers earned 25 percent more on average than those who did not. It is obvious that owning a laptop led to a higher- paying job.

Which of the following identifies a reasoning error in the argument?
A) it attempts to support a sweeping generalization on the basis of information about only a small number of individuals
B) Its conclusion merely restates a claim made earlier in the argument
C) It concludes that one thing was caused by another although the evidence given is consistent with the first thingтАЩs having caused the second
D) It offers information as support for a conclusion when that information actually shows that the conclusion is false
E) It uncritically projects currently existing trends indefinitely into the future
_________________

Thanks
Sarnia

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

 Economist GMAT Tutor Discount Codes Manhattan GMAT Discount Codes EMPOWERgmat Discount Codes
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2004, 02:27
C) Conclusion is that higher- paying job was caused by owning a laptop. Evidence given was that those who owned laptop computers earned 25 percent more on average than those who did not. Thus evidence was that it was the laptop which caused the increase in salary, not vice versa. The conclusion mixes cause/effect
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2004, 08:33
This Q looks like a trap. Next contender is B. How r u folks going to rule out B. B is saying the arguments restates the essential the same claim in a different way.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Location: 55405

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2004, 08:47
B says something different.

The "argument": (owners of) laptop computers earned 25 percent more on average than those who did not... (therefore) owning a laptop led to a higher- paying job

B says that Its conclusion merely restates a claim made earlier in the argument . This is untrue. The economist did not assert the causation that is implied by the statement that owning a laptop led to a higher- paying job.

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2003
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2004, 12:27
_________________

Thanks
Sarnia

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2004, 23:12
C it is...though 'A' is close being right too...

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

17 Jan 2004, 23:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by