It is currently 20 Nov 2017, 09:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR Although this bottle

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 310

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 05:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Although this bottle is labeled “vinegar,” no fizzing occurred when some of the liquid in it was added to powder from this box labeled “baking soda.” But when an acidic liquid such as vinegar is added to baking soda the resulting mixture fizzes, so this bottle clearly has been mislabeled.

A flaw in the reasoning in the argument above is that this argument
(A) ignores the possibility that the bottle contained an acidic liquid other than vinegar
(B) fails to exclude an alternative explanation for the observed effect
(C) depends on the use of the imprecise term “fizz”
(D) does not take into account the fact that scientific principles can be definitively tested only under controlled laboratory conditions
(E) assumes that the fact of a labeling error is proof of an intention to deceive

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 06:08
Rephrase>
acid ( as viniger ) ---> added to soda ---> fizz
bottle ( lab: viniger ) ---> pow ( lab:soda) --> no fizz
Conclusion-> bottle mislabeled

A flaw in the reasoning in the argument above is that this argument

(A) ignores the possibility that the bottle contained an acidic liquid other than vinegar
This strengthens the conclusion more.
(B) fails to exclude an alternative explanation for the observed effect
Why do we need to take in account an alternate explanation, the focus is fizzing.
(C) depends on the use of the imprecise term “fizz”
Not relevent.
(D) does not take into account the fact that scientific principles can be definitively tested only under controlled laboratory conditions
The flaw seems to be not to consider the enviorment in which fizzing should occur.
(E) assumes that the fact of a labeling error is proof of an intention to deceive
To deceive - something not discussed

D for me.

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 310

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 06:25
That's what I thought but OA is B.

Can anyone shed some light?

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 06:44
Ooops !

After your OA I realized that yes the alternate xplanation can be that the powder was not good ( not soda ). Then
the bottle remains Viniger.

Also, D is out of scope.

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 310

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 06:58
Thanks

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 08:56
why not A?

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 09:29
i picked B. Its the only one that stayed within scope ... the others (C, D, E) dont really play to the argument at hand, and even if A were true, some fizzing would occur, but according to the argument, nothing happened.

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2008
Posts: 130

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2008, 09:37
B - easy explanation - the flaw is that the baking soda could have been mislabeled, which is an alternative explanation.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 209

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2008, 12:11
whooops, no A. It is funny how you revisit this and you realize you were way off.

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: CR Although this bottle   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2008, 12:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR Although this bottle

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.