It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 15:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR: British labour party voter increase

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Mar 2015
Posts: 6

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 7

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: ISB '19
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.12
CR: British labour party voter increase [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2017, 02:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (01:24) correct 42% (01:31) wrong based on 122 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the first decade following the founding of the British labour party, the number of people regularly voting for Labour increased five-fold. The number of committed Labour voters increased a further five-fold during the party’s second decade. Since the increase was thus the same in the first as in the second decade, the often-made claim that the Labour party gained more voters in the party’s second decade than in its first is clearly false.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the Argument

A. fails to specify dates necessary to evaluate the truth of the conclusion, even though the argument depends on distinguishing between two time periods
B. draws a conclusion that cannot be true if all the data advanced in its support are true
C. relies on statistical evidence that, strictly speaking, is irrelevant to establishing the conclusion drawn
D. fails to allow for the possibility that the policy positions advocated by the Labour party changed during the period in question
E. overlooks the possibility that more elections were held in one of the two decades than were held in the other
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 7

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Math Expert
User avatar
D
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 5349

Kudos [?]: 6128 [1], given: 121

Re: CR: British labour party voter increase [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2017, 06:02
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
gmathunk wrote:
In the first decade following the founding of the British labour party, the number of people regularly voting for Labour increased five-fold. The number of committed Labour voters increased a further five-fold during the party’s second decade. Since the increase was thus the same in the first as in the second decade, the often-made claim that the Labour party gained more voters in the party’s second decade than in its first is clearly false.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the Argument

A. fails to specify dates necessary to evaluate the truth of the conclusion, even though the argument depends on distinguishing between two time periods
B. draws a conclusion that cannot be true if all the data advanced in its support are true
C. relies on statistical evidence that, strictly speaking, is irrelevant to establishing the conclusion drawn
D. fails to allow for the possibility that the policy positions advocated by the Labour party changed during the period in question
E. overlooks the possibility that more elections were held in one of the two decades than were held in the other



Hi..
The argument talks of 5-fold increase in each decade..
but the 5-fold increase in the second decade is over a larger number. so conclusion is not correct


say initially 100 guys.. end of decade 500.. increase 500-100=400
then starting of new decade 500.. end of that decade 5*500=2500... increase 2500-500=2000..

clearly 2nd decade increase was more

B
_________________

Absolute modulus :http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html

Kudos [?]: 6128 [1], given: 121

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1354

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1410

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR: British labour party voter increase [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Nov 2017, 22:30
this question is a LSAT question.

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 1410

Re: CR: British labour party voter increase   [#permalink] 23 Nov 2017, 22:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR: British labour party voter increase

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.