Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 26 Mar 2017, 06:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR: Brochure

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2005, 05:22
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Brochure: Help conserve our cityâ€™s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeownerâ€™s yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2005, 06:37
Quote:
Brochure: Help conserve our cityâ€™s water supply. By converting the landscaping in your yard to a water-conserving landscape, you can greatly reduce your outdoor water use. A water-conserving landscape is natural and attractive, and it also saves you money.

Criticism: For most people with yards, the savings from converting to a water-conserving landscape cannot justify the expense of new landscaping, since typically the conversion would save less than twenty dollars on a homeownerâ€™s yearly water bills.

Which of the following, if true, provides the best basis for a rebuttal of the criticism?

A. Even homeowners whose yards do not have water-conserving landscapes can conserve water by installing water-saving devices in their homes.
B. A conventional landscape generally requires a much greater expenditure on fertilizer and herbicide than does a water-conserving landscape.
C. A significant proportion of the residents of the city live in buildings that do not have yards.
D. It costs no more to put in water-conserving landscaping than it does to put in conventional landscaping.
E. Some homeowners use more water to maintain their yards than they use for all other purposes combined.

B

A -- so why am I discussing water saving devices. Irrelevant.

B - the savings is not just the yearly water bills, but also money saved from fertilizer and herbicide. Hence makes the change in landscaping a plan to be considered.

C - Irrelevant. Need I say why ?

D - Not quite upto the mark. We are converting a landscape, and not putting up a new one.

E -- irrelevant. the homeowner might have a dog which likes to bath in spraying water, but should I be bothered about it ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2005
Posts: 351
Location: USA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2005, 08:17
The Answer is very clearly B.

B states that conventional gardening requires fertilizers and herbicide than a water-conserving landscape, and that this makes conventional gardening more expensive.

The criticism, states that the savings in water bills are minimal, but Choice B offers an effective rebuttal that the cost saving by not using fertilizers and herbicide will result in significant cost savings. Thus B
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2005, 21:53
okdongdong - you got start giving us some OAs
SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1727
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2005, 23:42
B is plain.
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 161
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2005, 04:28
the official answer is B
13 Jul 2005, 04:28
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 All-included tour package brochure: 10 28 Jun 2015, 03:56
8 Brochure of an opposition political organization: 10 09 Aug 2013, 22:30
1 The brochure for Sailboat Sellers Inc. indicates that 13 09 Mar 2013, 13:26
22 Brochure: Help conserve our city's water supply. By 7 08 Nov 2012, 05:33
CR 17 08 Aug 2007, 06:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR: Brochure

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.