It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 15:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 356

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Illinois
CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 14:36
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Please explain
Attachments

crimg.jpg [ 58.69 KiB | Viewed 1135 times ]

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 14:49
C is an assumption according to me. The conclusion says that it is enough to meet the need of....so if you negate C the conclusion doesn't hold good

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 14:55
Only A and E are contenders but I go with A
A) If it is not possible to recover the oil from those far away regions, how can we say that there is enough oil supply for 500 years?
C) even though oil will NOT be an important energy source in the future, it does not change the fact that there will be enough supply for 500 years
E) Even though there is no new technology that will make oil drilling more feasible, actual technology may be sufficient
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 15:13
My choice is A.

I see no choice other than A which provides any proper assumption which supports the conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 20:54
I messed it up, Went with C and after Paul's explination, it makes sense.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 336

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 06:13
My vote is for A

The author concludes that the oil needs of the world can be met. Thus, there will be enough oil only if one can have the existing oil + more oil than that exists now. And this will happen only if one can recover oil from unexplored area.

If you know therez oil in an area and you are not able to explore it, it will be of no use. There will be shortage in the future.
_________________

510 on my first GMAT. 610 on second GMAT.!
The struggle continues.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 356

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Illinois

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 06:24
The OA is B. But I think that is wrong because the argument already assumes that the future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Location: San Jose, CA

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 11:25
Definitely A

Not sure why OA is B ... doesnt make sense .... what's the source of the Q?

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2004, 18:46
gmatblast wrote:
The OA is B. But I think that is wrong because the argument already assumes that the future consumption grows at an accelerating rate.

How shocking???? I hold on with A
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5034

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2004, 20:26
another 'stunning' OA. How can (B) be right ? The author already concludes that acceleration of oil consumption is not a big deal and that should not be based on the assumption that rate of consumption staying constant.
(A) is better. Although projections may be right about availability of oil, there is no gaurantee they can be tapped into.

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

12 Aug 2004, 20:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR - GEOLOGISTS' ASSUMPTION ABOUT OIL

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.