Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 17:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR GMATPREP

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 311
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2006, 15:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

I disagree with the correct this question. I think you have to assume outside the argument. Basically what you would have to assume is that the price controls didn't apply to new medicatons which isn't given in the question. Total BS!
Attachments

voroniarc.jpg [ 99.14 KiB | Viewed 1016 times ]

Director
Joined: 06 May 2006
Posts: 791
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2006, 15:19
B/w A and B, I would go with A, as it explains the increase in per capita expenditure. B explains the 'total expenditure' on medications, not the 'per capita' expenditure.
_________________

Uh uh. I know what you're thinking. "Is the answer A, B, C, D or E?" Well to tell you the truth in all this excitement I kinda lost track myself. But you've gotta ask yourself one question: "Do I feel lucky?" Well, do ya, punk?

Senior Manager
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2006, 15:30
B/w A and B, I would go with A, as it explains the increase in per capita expenditure. B explains the 'total expenditure' on medications, not the 'per capita' expenditure.

A by POE.. With A, we still have to make one more assumption - the new drugs produced are priced higher ..

Actually B doesn't explain at all as the argument says "use of prescription drug didn't expand"..
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 May 2004
Posts: 311
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2006, 15:52
I was thinking with B, the rate of increase use on a per person basis did not increase, but since the population increased, the per capita (which is measurement per househould irrespective of number of people) increased and hence costs increased

Either way, the question sucked and is not a quality question
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5221
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 402 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2006, 07:14
jamesrwrightiii wrote:
I was thinking with B, the rate of increase use on a per person basis did not increase, but since the population increased, the per capita (which is measurement per househould irrespective of number of people) increased and hence costs increased

Either way, the question sucked and is not a quality question

In terms of the national census, you are correct. But nowhere in the passage does it say that per capita refers to "per household," therefore we must draw a conclusion based only on the information given.

B doesn`t solve the paradox becuase it just claims that the population expanded. A, on the other hand, implies that the newer drugs were more much suitable for the local market, which in turn spent more for the improved (newer) medications.
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 67
Location: Boston
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2006, 11:09
Can we think this way:

per capita expenditure = total expenditure / total people (or household)

if total people increased, then per capital should come down, because it is the denominator

Since per capita expenditure increased, the neomarator (forgive my spelling) total expenditure should increase. Hence it cannot be B.

The only other valid option is A.
_________________

Good is the greatest enemy of great.

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1730
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

24 Jul 2006, 04:16
I think it is A.

Made the same mistake when I attempted the question but I understand the problem now.

Basically the goverment put a freeze on the price increase of existing medicines.
The only way pharma companies can beat this freeze and still make a profit is to manufactur new products to replace existing medicines. Since the freeze applies to existing medicines not new medicines, the pharma companies can ask whatever price they want.
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 328
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2006, 05:59
Yes A but with an assumption that the new medicines are priced higher...
08 Aug 2006, 05:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
GMATPrep CR 1 15 Jun 2011, 08:46
GMATPrep CR 6 08 Sep 2009, 14:29
CR-gmatprep 3 19 May 2009, 09:27
1 CR-gmatprep 10 26 Jan 2009, 22:14
CR-gmatprep 12 29 Jan 2009, 03:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR GMATPREP

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.