It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 18:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR intelligent life

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2008, 02:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:02) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The question whether intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is certainly imprecise, because we are not sure how different from us something might be and still count as “intelligent life.” Yet we cannot just decide to define “intelligent life” in some more precise way since it is likely that we will find and recognize intelligent life elsewhere in the universe only if we leave our definitions open to new, unimagined possibilities.
The argument can most reasonably be interpreted as an objection to which one of the following claims?
(A) The question whether intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is one that will never be correctly answered.
(B) Whether or not there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, our understanding of intelligent life is limited.
(C) The question about the existence of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe must be made more precise if we hope to answer it correctly.
(D) The question whether there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is so imprecise as to be meaningless.
(E) The question whether there is intelligent life elsewhere in the universe is one we should not spend our time trying to answer.

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2008, 07:18
We are looking for something that argument is objecting. Only C seems relevant.

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2008, 00:08
what abt B?

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 116

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2008, 00:19
rafiaiqbal wrote:
what abt B?

We have to point out a claim which the argument raises an objection to. argument agrees with b rather than objecting it. C seems to be the best.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2008, 06:02
OA is C

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 457

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2008, 07:27
C it is!
_________________

-Underline your question. It takes only a few seconds!
-Search before you post.

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 4

VP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

15 May 2010, 07:54
The passage, if seen as an objection to an antecedent claim, challenges that claim by:

(A) showing the claim to be irrelevant to the issue at hand
(B) citing examples that fail to fit proposed definition of “intelligent life”
(C) claiming that “intelligent life” cannot be adequately defined
(D) arguing that the claim, if acted on, would be counterproductive
(E) maintaining that the claim is not supported by the available evidence
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1500 [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

23 May 2010, 12:54
noboru wrote:
The passage, if seen as an objection to an antecedent claim, challenges that claim by:

(A) showing the claim to be irrelevant to the issue at hand
(B) citing examples that fail to fit proposed definition of “intelligent life”
(C) claiming that “intelligent life” cannot be adequately defined
(D) arguing that the claim, if acted on, would be counterproductive
(E) maintaining that the claim is not supported by the available evidence

Wow. How do you tackle this question.

OA: [/sto
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 7

Re: CR intelligent life   [#permalink] 23 May 2010, 12:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR intelligent life

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.