It is currently 23 Sep 2017, 14:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR - person who became teachers in 1968

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 732 [0], given: 6

CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2010, 11:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

71% (01:07) correct 29% (01:51) wrong based on 20 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Of those person who became teachers in 1968 and who later left the profession, 30 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year: of those who became teachers in 1968 and have remained in the profession, only 15 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year. These figures indicate how underpaid teachers are today.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions about the persons for whom statistics are cited?

(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than \$35,000 a year if they had left teaching.
(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.
(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn.
(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than \$35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession

Kudos [?]: 732 [0], given: 6

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 298

Kudos [?]: 144 [1], given: 6

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2010, 11:27
1
KUDOS
seekmba wrote:

Of those person who became teachers in 1968 and who later left the profession, 30 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year: of those who became teachers in 1968 and have remained in the profession, only 15 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year. These figures indicate how underpaid teachers are today.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions about the persons for whom statistics are cited?

(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than \$35,000 a year if they had left teaching. --- Its a shell game answer, the argument cant depend on that in fact the argument is giving us statistics so incorrect
(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.--- Correct , This is what the argument is assuming that the conditions and factors are the same
(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn.--- no where its mentioned that they left their jobs because of low salaries
(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.--- Irrelevalent to the argument
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than \$35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession -- Irrelevalent

Kudos [?]: 144 [1], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 196

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 12

Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2010, 13:53
(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than \$35,000 a year if they had left teaching.
>> This is a inference and not an assumption.
(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.
>> Correct assumption.
(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn.
>> Is not relevant for assumption of statistics.
(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.
>> Is not relevant for assumption of statistics.
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than \$35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession
>> This weakens the argument.

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 12

Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2009
Posts: 11

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2010, 00:20
Between A and B.
But I will choose A.

Pr - 30% of teachers were underpaid in the past
Assumption - This proportion is correct today.
Concl - teachers are underpaid today.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 315

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 44

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2010, 00:42
I think it's B.

Agree with nitishmahajan's explanation.

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 44

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 591

Kudos [?]: 430 [0], given: 412

GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
WE: Business Development (Telecommunications)
Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Mar 2010, 08:17
thanku for the explanation

Kudos [?]: 430 [0], given: 412

Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 240

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Apr 2010, 08:48
B it is.
A is a prediction. It could have gone other way, and still you could make the same argument in present.

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 16

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 33

WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Apr 2010, 12:19
IMO B.....
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 33

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 446

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 157

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Jun 2010, 05:50
nitishmahajan wrote:
seekmba wrote:

Of those person who became teachers in 1968 and who later left the profession, 30 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year: of those who became teachers in 1968 and have remained in the profession, only 15 percent today earn salaries above \$35,000 a year. These figures indicate how underpaid teachers are today.

The argument above depends on which of the following assumptions about the persons for whom statistics are cited?

(A) At least one-third of the group of persons who have remained in teaching would today be earning more than \$35,000 a year if they had left teaching. --- Its a shell game answer, the argument cant depend on that in fact the argument is giving us statistics so incorrect
(B) The group of persons who left teaching and the group who did not are comparable in terms of factors that determine how much people outside the teaching profession are paid.--- Correct , This is what the argument is assuming that the conditions and factors are the same
(C) Most of those persons who left teaching did so entirely because of the low salaries teachers earn.--- no where its mentioned that they left their jobs because of low salaries
(D) As a group, those persons who have remained in teaching are abler and more dedicated than the group of persons who left teaching.--- Irrelevalent to the argument
(E) The group of persons who left teaching and who today earn more than \$35,000 a year were more capable teachers than the group who remained in the profession -- Irrelevalent

Nitish u said this is a shell game answer, is it a concept of Powerbible Gmat CR.

The answer is confusing between B and C
because yes at the end B is clearer but the confusing thing when reading for the first time is that one feels while reading "are they assuming that the factors are same when comparision is made"?
Thanks.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 157

Re: CR - person who became teachers in 1968   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2010, 05:50
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources 15 09 Sep 2010, 02:29
Teacher: Journalists who conceal the identity of the sources 4 09 Jun 2009, 02:52
Assumptions CR: Blindfolded person 0 15 Feb 2017, 08:49
1 CR - Age of a person 4 13 Feb 2010, 16:25
School children who are punished by their teachers for not 11 02 Oct 2007, 06:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR - person who became teachers in 1968

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.