GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2018, 10:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4479
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jan 2016, 11:38
1
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:29) correct 44% (01:37) wrong based on 513 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.

E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online

Most Helpful Expert Reply
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6957
CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2016, 05:16
5
RAHKARP27071989 wrote:

Hi chetan2u,

I got your reasoning, but one more thing to ask..

Quote:
Up to my understanding if GMAT question says-->Increasing A leads to increase B ) And now we need to weaken this conclusion
That means we need to show Increasing A DOES NOT leads to increase B
Now, if we come across an option which says Increasing C DOES NOT leads to increase B ( This option can't WEAKEN until C and A are interlinked )


you are correct in the observation. But the logic in the Q does not follow the same pattern..
It says:- However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries...
the use of "if it had not been for" tells us that capital reseves is the only reason"
So to negate it, we have to show " that there can be other reasons too which can lead to same outcome"

here the logic is..
1)A would not have happened if it had not been for B..
that is Only B can lead to A..
2)to weaken this, you have to show C can also lead to A..
this is exactly Choice C is doing ..

_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 205
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2016, 10:38
1
Hi souvik101990,

Can you please share OE...??


chetan2u,

Although I choose the correct answer, but I am not convinced.
I opted C because other options ( A, D and E) are completely irrelevant.

Now left with B and C.

Conclusion- if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future
As we have to weaken the argument, so we need to find an option which says
Increasing capital reserve not going improve employment rate.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
The word "SOME" makes me cautious. Therefore eliminated.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

I opted it bcz nothing left.
What is the link between LABOR COSTS and CASH RESERVES....?

Does it mean if labor cost increases then we have to take amount from cash reserve and hence employment rate not going to improve..?
Am I rite..?

Please assist.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar

Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Posts: 6957
CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2016, 20:35
RAHKARP27071989 wrote:
Hi souvik101990,

Can you please share OE...??


chetan2u,

Although I choose the correct answer, but I am not convinced.
I opted C because other options ( A, D and E) are completely irrelevant


Conclusion- if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future
As we have to weaken the argument, so we need to find an option which says
Increasing capital reserve not going improve employment rate.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
The word "SOME" makes me cautious. Therefore eliminated.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

I opted it bcz nothing left.
What is the link between LABOR COSTS and CASH RESERVES....?

Does it mean if labor cost increases then we have to take amount from cash reserve and hence employment rate not going to improve..?
Am I rite..?

Please assist.


Hi,

here, we have to doubt the argument, and just not the conclusion..

the argument is..
decline in employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow growth. However,predictions would not have affected if major ind had capital reserves...
and conclusion is
if the major industries increase their cash reserves, there will be no decline in employment rate..

You have eliminated B for correct reasons ..

the reasoning for C to be correct is:-
C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate...

C is giving reasons other than sufficient reserves that can result in decrease of employment rate.
So even if the industries had sufficient reserves, an increase in labour costs can lead to decrease in employment rate..
_________________

1) Absolute modulus : http://gmatclub.com/forum/absolute-modulus-a-better-understanding-210849.html#p1622372
2)Combination of similar and dissimilar things : http://gmatclub.com/forum/topic215915.html
3) effects of arithmetic operations : https://gmatclub.com/forum/effects-of-arithmetic-operations-on-fractions-269413.html


GMAT online Tutor

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 205
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2016, 14:45
chetan2u wrote:
RAHKARP27071989 wrote:
Hi souvik101990,

Can you please share OE...??


chetan2u,

Although I choose the correct answer, but I am not convinced.
I opted C because other options ( A, D and E) are completely irrelevant.

Now left with B and C.

Conclusion- if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future
As we have to weaken the argument, so we need to find an option which says
Increasing capital reserve not going improve employment rate.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
The word "SOME" makes me cautious. Therefore eliminated.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

I opted it bcz nothing left.
What is the link between LABOR COSTS and CASH RESERVES....?

Does it mean if labor cost increases then we have to take amount from cash reserve and hence employment rate not going to improve..?
Am I rite..?

Please assist.


Hi,

here, we have to doubt the argument, and just not the conclusion..

the argument is..
decline in employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow growth. However,predictions would not have affected if major ind had capital reserves...
and conclusion is
if the major industries increase their cash reserves, there will be no decline in employment rate..

You have eliminated B for correct reasons ..

the reasoning for C to be correct is:-
C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate...

C is giving reasons other than sufficient reserves that can result in decrease of employment rate.
So even if the industries had sufficient reserves, an increase in labour costs can lead to decrease in employment rate..



Hi chetan2u,

I got your reasoning, but one more thing to ask..

Up to my understanding if GMAT question says-->Increasing A leads to increase B ) And now we need to weaken this conclusion
That means we need to show Increasing A DOES NOT leads to increase B
Now, if we come across an option which says Increasing C DOES NOT leads to increase B ( This option can't WEAKEN until C and A are interlinked )

In argument

The conclusion says-->
Increase in Cash reserves leads to improve employment rate or decrease Unemployment.
Now if any option gives any kind of connection between Labor cost and Employment Rate--> WE DON'T CARE
Bcz we just need to prove Improving Cash reserves does not improve employment rate.

We will only consider any option if it is going to make impact on Cash reserve and in turn impact on employment rate.

CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2015
Posts: 205
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2016, 11:21
HI chetan2u,

Bingo....:D
You are absolutely correct. From now onward I will definitely pay attention to this kind of wording.

Thanks alot... :)
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Prakhar

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 86
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2016, 00:52
Hi Experts , when i was trying to attempt this question i was thinking that we need an option that would suggest that not capital reserves but prediction was the cause of decline in empl rate and option A matches it. It says that major industry foresaw the drop in empl rate. Can you please explain why this option is wrong.?
Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Apr 2014
Posts: 64
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 2.75
Reviews Badge
CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2016, 19:04
rakaisraka wrote:
Hi Experts , when i was trying to attempt this question i was thinking that we need an option that would suggest that not capital reserves but prediction was the cause of decline in empl rate and option A matches it. It says that major industry foresaw the drop in empl rate. Can you please explain why this option is wrong.?
Thanks


The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate
D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.

E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.



First line of the argument says that "The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions "
Therefore we cannot have option A as the answer as it is already mentioned in argument and therefore cannot be used as a weakening statement.

Also, this argument has causative structure wherein If capital reserve is there (cause) --> employment rate will not decline (effect).
As mentioned in the discussion above, option C gives another reason for the effect and is therefore a perfect answer.

Just to add:-
Few ways we can weaken a causation relation :-
1. Show that there is reverse causation in play.
2. Show that correlation is in play (some other cause for both earlier mentioned cause and effect).
3. Show that there is some other cause for the same effect - this is what is happening here in right answer- labor cost is adversely affecting employment rate.
4. Show that there is some issue with the cause. Any problem with the cause will weaken the whole relation.

Also we should not use some info which is already given in argument to weaken the conclusion.

Hope this helps.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3180
Premium Member
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Sep 2018, 23:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by &nbs [#permalink] 25 Sep 2018, 23:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR Revision: The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.