Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 27 May 2017, 00:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR - very old but answer not giving anywhere on internet.

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [1] , given: 0

CR - very old but answer not giving anywhere on internet. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 07:39
1
KUDOS
Questions 8-9
Walter: A copy of an artwork should be worth exactly what the original is worth if the two works are visually indistinguishable. After all, if the two works are visually indistinguishable, they have all the same qualities, and if they have all the same qualities, their prices should be equal.
Marissa: How little you understand art! Even if someone could make a perfect copy that is visually indistinguishable from the original, the copy would have a different history and hence not have all the same qualities as the original.
8. Which of the following is a point at issue between Walter and Marissa?
(A) Whether a copy of an artwork could ever be visually indistinguishable from the original
(B) Whether the reproduction of a work of art is ever worth more than the original is worth
(C) Whether a copy of a work of art is ever mistaken for the original
(D) Whether a copy of a work of art could have all the same qualities as the original
(E) Whether originality is the only valuable attribute that a work of art can possess
9. Marissa uses which of the following techniques in attempting to refute Walterâ€™s argument?
(A) Attacking his assumption that the price of an artwork indicates its worth
(B) Raising a point that would undermine one of the claims on which his conclusion is based
(C) Questioning his claim that a perfect copy of a work of art would be visually indistinguishable from the original
(D) Giving reason to believe that Walter is unable to judge the quality of a work of art because of his inadequate understanding of the history of art
(E) Proposing alternative criteria for determining whether two works of art are visually indistinguishable
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Status: *Lost and found*
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 123
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 14

Re: CR - very old but answer not giving anywhere on internet. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 07:59
GMATCracker22 wrote:
Questions 8-9
Walter: A copy of an artwork should be worth exactly what the original is worth if the two works are visually indistinguishable. After all, if the two works are visually indistinguishable, they have all the same qualities, and if they have all the same qualities, their prices should be equal.
Marissa: How little you understand art! Even if someone could make a perfect copy that is visually indistinguishable from the original, the copy would have a different history and hence not have all the same qualities as the original.
8. Which of the following is a point at issue between Walter and Marissa?
(A) Whether a copy of an artwork could ever be visually indistinguishable from the original
(B) Whether the reproduction of a work of art is ever worth more than the original is worth
(C) Whether a copy of a work of art is ever mistaken for the original
(D) Whether a copy of a work of art could have all the same qualities as the original
(E) Whether originality is the only valuable attribute that a work of art can possess
9. Marissa uses which of the following techniques in attempting to refute Walterâ€™s argument?
(A) Attacking his assumption that the price of an artwork indicates its worth
(B) Raising a point that would undermine one of the claims on which his conclusion is based
(C) Questioning his claim that a perfect copy of a work of art would be visually indistinguishable from the original
(D) Giving reason to believe that Walter is unable to judge the quality of a work of art because of his inadequate understanding of the history of art
(E) Proposing alternative criteria for determining whether two works of art are visually indistinguishable

I feel the answers should be [E] and [B] respectively.

Marissa rejects Walter's claim over the fact of the value of originality. Even if two paintings are virtually indistinguishable, the original is of more value, because it has a rich history with it. Even though all the qualities may match, originality triumphs over them.

Similarly, for the second question, Marissa undermines Walter's conclusion that 'if two paintings resemble each other completely, they should be of same value' using originality. The rest of the choices I feel do not fit the description.

Please correct me if I am wrong!

Regards,
A
_________________

Feed me some KUDOS! *always hungry*

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 800
Followers: 368

Kudos [?]: 746 [0], given: 5

Re: CR - very old but answer not giving anywhere on internet. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2013, 21:27
GMATCracker22 wrote:
Questions 8-9
Walter: A copy of an artwork should be worth exactly what the original is worth if the two works are visually indistinguishable. After all, if the two works are visually indistinguishable, they have all the same qualities, and if they have all the same qualities, their prices should be equal.
Marissa: How little you understand art! Even if someone could make a perfect copy that is visually indistinguishable from the original, the copy would have a different history and hence not have all the same qualities as the original.
8. Which of the following is a point at issue between Walter and Marissa?
(A) Whether a copy of an artwork could ever be visually indistinguishable from the original
(B) Whether the reproduction of a work of art is ever worth more than the original is worth
(C) Whether a copy of a work of art is ever mistaken for the original
(D) Whether a copy of a work of art could have all the same qualities as the original
(E) Whether originality is the only valuable attribute that a work of art can possess
9. Marissa uses which of the following techniques in attempting to refute Walterâ€™s argument?
(A) Attacking his assumption that the price of an artwork indicates its worth
(B) Raising a point that would undermine one of the claims on which his conclusion is based
(C) Questioning his claim that a perfect copy of a work of art would be visually indistinguishable from the original
(D) Giving reason to believe that Walter is unable to judge the quality of a work of art because of his inadequate understanding of the history of art
(E) Proposing alternative criteria for determining whether two works of art are visually indistinguishable

See my analysis below...

8)
A - Even though Marissa does cast doubt on the ability of a copy to be visually indistinguishable, the main point is about the underlying qualities, outside visual appearance, of works of art
B - The argument is whether a copy could be worth AS MUCH AS, not more than, the original
C - Not at issue in the argument
D - Correct - The core of the argument is whether a copy can have all the same qualities of the original work of art and therefore have the same value. Walter asserts that visual appearances contain all qualities while Marissa introduces the underlying qualities (i.e. history) which give original works of art different qualities than copies. [Notice how the answer has the same language as the argument with "all the same qualities"…]
E - originality is a term not introduced in the argument (it's a variant of original but the words have different meaning), we are discussing the qualities of original vs. copy

9)
A - Worth is not part of the argument
B - Correct - Marissa's point is that there are other qualities of artwork outside the visual appearance that generate value. This undermines Walter's point that once two works are visually indistinguishable they have ALL the same qualities.
C - Marissa's main purpose is to show that even with a perfect copy the qualities would still be different
D - Marissa is talking about the value of individual artwork when she talks about "history" not Walter's knowledge of the overall "history of art"
E - Marissa is proposing alternative criteria for determining the underlying qualities of artwork, not how to determine their visual similarity

KW
_________________

Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Re: CR - very old but answer not giving anywhere on internet.   [#permalink] 22 Jun 2013, 21:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 A mistake in OG2015 CR questions 113 answer explanation on page 652 4 04 Mar 2015, 14:00
Very badly Need help in CR questions :( 5 14 Aug 2014, 13:24
RC/ SC/ CR 1000 - Answer Explanations 5 17 Sep 2013, 07:42
detailed answers to 1000 cr, 1000 rc and 1000 sc 4 12 Sep 2007, 12:12
Answer 1 02 Aug 2007, 01:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by