Critical reasoning : Ask GMAT Experts
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 19 Feb 2017, 14:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Critical reasoning

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 31
GPA: 3.65
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [1] , given: 23

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2012, 11:58
1
KUDOS
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

The figures in portraits by the spanish painter El Greco(1514-1614) are systematically elonged.In Il Grecos time.the intentional distortion of human figures was unprecedented in European painting.Consequently, some critics have suggested that El greco had an astigmatism , a type of visual impairment,that resulted in people appearing to him in the distorted way that is characteristic of his paintings.However,this suggestion can not be the explanation,because_

(A)several twentieth-century artists have consciously adopted from El Grecos paintings the systematic elongation of the human form

(B)some people do have elongated bodies somewhat like those depicted in El Grecos portraits

(C)If El Greco had an astigmatism,then relative to how people looked to him, the elongated figures in his paintings would have appeared to him to be distorted

(D)even if El Greco had an astigmatism,there would have been no correction for it available in the period in which he lived

(E)there were non -European artists,even in El Grecos time,who included their works human figures that were intentionally distorted.

the answer is c.but i am not understanding why its c and why its not e.explain plz...........
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7173
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 2160

Kudos [?]: 13979 [1] , given: 222

### Show Tags

04 Nov 2012, 20:44
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
supri1234 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

The figures in portraits by the spanish painter El Greco(1514-1614) are systematically elonged.In Il Grecos time.the intentional distortion of human figures was unprecedented in European painting.Consequently, some critics have suggested that El greco had an astigmatism , a type of visual impairment,that resulted in people appearing to him in the distorted way that is characteristic of his paintings.However,this suggestion can not be the explanation,because_

(A)several twentieth-century artists have consciously adopted from El Grecos paintings the systematic elongation of the human form

(B)some people do have elongated bodies somewhat like those depicted in El Grecos portraits

(C)If El Greco had an astigmatism,then relative to how people looked to him, the elongated figures in his paintings would have appeared to him to be distorted

(D)even if El Greco had an astigmatism,there would have been no correction for it available in the period in which he lived

(E)there were non -European artists,even in El Grecos time,who included their works human figures that were intentionally distorted.

the answer is c.but i am not understanding why its c and why its not e.explain plz...........

To understand this, take an example.

Say you are wearing funny glasses. When you wear them, they change your color perception. When you see a red object, it appears blue. when you see a blue object, it appears green etc

Say, you see a red apple. It appears blue to you. You want to paint it so you take out your paints. In which paint will you dip your brush? Red or blue? You will dip your brush in red paint because it appears blue to you. The blue paint actually appears green to you! When you make an apple, it appears blue to you (just like the actual apple appears to you) but to people who are not wearing funny glasses, it appears red only (i.e. just like the actual apple appears to them).

The point is that with the glasses, your perception is the same with everything. Now, if instead, you were wearing glasses that make people appear long, even in your painting when you make them normal, they will appear long to you (i.e. the way they appear to you). If you make them extra long, they were appear much longer in your painting than they do to you otherwise. This is what (C) says. If he had astigmatism, he would still have drawn normal people only since even in his drawings, they would have appeared long to him. Had he drawn them long, he would have seen them even longer and hence, distorted.

(E) is incorrect. You have to give a reason why astigmatism cannot be the explanation "However,this suggestion can not be the explanation,because_"
You don't have to give another possible reason. You have to say why astigmatism cannot be responsible. What else could be responsible is not our business in this sentence.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 244
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 25

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 03:39
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
supri1234 wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

The figures in portraits by the spanish painter El Greco(1514-1614) are systematically elonged.In Il Grecos time.the intentional distortion of human figures was unprecedented in European painting.Consequently, some critics have suggested that El greco had an astigmatism , a type of visual impairment,that resulted in people appearing to him in the distorted way that is characteristic of his paintings.However,this suggestion can not be the explanation,because_

(A)several twentieth-century artists have consciously adopted from El Grecos paintings the systematic elongation of the human form

(B)some people do have elongated bodies somewhat like those depicted in El Grecos portraits

(C)If El Greco had an astigmatism,then relative to how people looked to him, the elongated figures in his paintings would have appeared to him to be distorted

(D)even if El Greco had an astigmatism,there would have been no correction for it available in the period in which he lived

(E)there were non -European artists,even in El Grecos time,who included their works human figures that were intentionally distorted.

the answer is c.but i am not understanding why its c and why its not e.explain plz...........

To understand this, take an example.

Say you are wearing funny glasses. When you wear them, they change your color perception. When you see a red object, it appears blue. when you see a blue object, it appears green etc

Say, you see a red apple. It appears blue to you. You want to paint it so you take out your paints. In which paint will you dip your brush? Red or blue? You will dip your brush in red paint because it appears blue to you. The blue paint actually appears green to you! When you make an apple, it appears blue to you (just like the actual apple appears to you) but to people who are not wearing funny glasses, it appears red only (i.e. just like the actual apple appears to them).

The point is that with the glasses, your perception is the same with everything. Now, if instead, you were wearing glasses that make people appear long, even in your painting when you make them normal, they will appear long to you (i.e. the way they appear to you). If you make them extra long, they were appear much longer in your painting than they do to you otherwise. This is what (C) says. If he had astigmatism, he would still have drawn normal people only since even in his drawings, they would have appeared long to him. Had he drawn them long, he would have seen them even longer and hence, distorted.

(E) is incorrect. You have to give a reason why astigmatism cannot be the explanation "However,this suggestion can not be the explanation,because_"
You don't have to give another possible reason. You have to say why astigmatism cannot be responsible. What else could be responsible is not our business in this sentence.

good explaination
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Re: Critical reasoning   [#permalink] 05 Nov 2012, 03:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Critical Reasoning. 2 28 Aug 2016, 20:41
Critical Reasoning 2 13 May 2015, 03:52
1 Critical Reasoning 4 26 Feb 2014, 17:09
Critical Reasoning - Hypothesise ? 0 24 Nov 2011, 10:57
critical reasoning problem 1 06 Oct 2011, 22:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by