It is currently 25 Jun 2017, 22:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 637
Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:09
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified. Reliable x-ray and chemical tests show that the red pigment was applied after the painting had been completed, and that the red paint was not mixed in Veronese’s workshop. Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese’s painting after its completion.

Art critic: But in a copy of Veronese’s painting made shortly after Veronese died, the cloak is red. It is highly unlikely that a copyist would have made so major a change so soon after Veronese’s death.

9. The assertion that a later artist tampered with Veronese’s painting serves which one of the following functions in the curator’s argument?
(A) It is the main point toward which the argument as a whole is directed.
(B) It is a subsidiary conclusion that supports the argument’s main conclusion.
(C) It is a clarification of a key term of the argument.
(D) It is a particular instance of the general position to be defended.
(E) It is a reiteration of the main point that is made for the sake of emphasis.

Can someone point out the conclusion and sub-conclusion in the Curator's argument?
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 99
Re: CR: Veronese's painting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:20
eyunni wrote:
Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified. Reliable x-ray and chemical tests show that the red pigment was applied after the painting had been completed, and that the red paint was not mixed in Veronese’s workshop. Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese’s painting after its completion.

Art critic: But in a copy of Veronese’s painting made shortly after Veronese died, the cloak is red. It is highly unlikely that a copyist would have made so major a change so soon after Veronese’s death.

9. The assertion that a later artist tampered with Veronese’s painting serves which one of the following functions in the curator’s argument?
(A) It is the main point toward which the argument as a whole is directed.
(B) It is a subsidiary conclusion that supports the argument’s main conclusion.
(C) It is a clarification of a key term of the argument.
(D) It is a particular instance of the general position to be defended.
(E) It is a reiteration of the main point that is made for the sake of emphasis.

Can someone point out the conclusion and sub-conclusion in the Curator's argument?

B IMO. The notion that a later artist tampered with the painting is not a fact, it is a conclusion open to debate, which in turn supports the main conclusion - the change is justified.
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 637

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:25
Is there general thumb rule or signal to differentiate a conclusion from a sub-conclusion for a given CR?
Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 99

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:30
eyunni wrote:
Is there general thumb rule or signal to differentiate a conclusion from a sub-conclusion for a given CR?

I would imagine that a sub-conclusion is subordinate to the main conclusion of the argument?
Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 510
Location: Indonesia

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:36
I will go with A

Here, the main point of discussion is that whether an aritst other than veronese tapered with veronese's paintings after its completition.

Curator feels so, but Art critic doesnt. He argues that its not possible.

If one put together both the comments one realize that the main point of discussion is that whether an artist other than ......

here sub conclusion should be "The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified"

Amar
Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 637

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 17:47
alrussell wrote:
eyunni wrote:
Is there general thumb rule or signal to differentiate a conclusion from a sub-conclusion for a given CR?

I would imagine that a sub-conclusion is subordinate to the main conclusion of the argument?

Something I have learnt from this CR is not to choose the 'hence' part as the conclusion. It could very well be the sub-conclusion as it is the case now. After a little bit of thinking, I see what you mean. If the sub-conclusion:Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese’s painting after its completion.

is made the conclusion and the conclusion:
The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified.

is made the sub-conclusion, it will not make as much sense.
OA is B indeed.

An unsuspecting test taker (like me ) would have thought of 'hence' as a precursor to a conclusion. However, that is not the case.
Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 510
Location: Indonesia

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 18:07
Thanks,

Somehow, the role of the critic is confusing... and it allures to click the option A...

Amar
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2559

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2007, 18:21
Amardeep Sharma wrote:
Thanks,

Somehow, the role of the critic is confusing... and it allures to click the option A...

Amar

I agree. I spent about 3 1/2 min on this to arrive @ B b/c I wasnt really sure what the purpose of the critic was. I reread the question and it appears the critic is nothing more than a distraction.

Main conclusion is: "The decision to restore the cloak of the central figure in Veronese’s painting from its present red to the green found underneath is fully justified."

Sub-Conclusion: "Hence it appears likely that an artist other than Veronese tampered with Veronese’s painting after its completion."
18 Nov 2007, 18:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 22 09 Sep 2010, 11:09
Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central 10 16 May 2011, 03:34
Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central 7 15 Dec 2008, 23:46
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central 18 03 Nov 2009, 10:36
President of Central Supply Company: Profits are at an 7 11 Oct 2007, 06:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Curator: The decision to restore the cloak of the central

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.