Darwin's theory of evolution while revolutionary at that time, was formulated before most of this century's great advances in genetics and bio-engineering. Today we have a far deeper understanding of the ability of genes and environment to influence each other and the organism. It would be foolish to continue parroting Darwin's theory as if these advances had never occurred.
It can be inferred from the passage above that the author would most likely favour:
A. A re-examination of Darwin's theory in the light of contemporary biology.
Correctauthors conclusion - It would be foolish to continue parroting Darwin's theory as if these advances had never occurred.
so author would most likely to support this choice
B. A critical re-examination of Darwin's place among renowned scientists.
Incorrectauthor is not interested about Darwin's place
C. Increased financial support for studies in genetics and bioengineering.
Incorrectauthor didnt says financial support required for studies in genetics and bioengineering, but he says we have already done great advances in genetics and bio-engineering
D. Abandoning of Darwin's theory.
Incorrecthe is interested about Darwin's theory, not abandoning it
E. A greater reliance on genetics than on environmental factors to account for behaviour.
IncorrectIrrelevant
_________________
For verbal chat and questions
Join HereVerbal Question of the Day