It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 00:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2007, 18:54
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument.
D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

OA: E

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Apr 2007, 21:33
E.

Premise 1
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.

Consideration : Whether it can be concluded ? that for a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly

Conclusion: The answer, Clearly, is yes i.e. For a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly

Explanation: Keyword 'Since' The amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

Conclusion rests on premise of the argument and the explanation offered to support it.

With that said lets look at the options.

A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.

---No content identified .

B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.

--- Support provided but no content identified

C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument.

---Irrelevant

D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.

--- Irrelevant

E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument. Yes !

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2007, 12:01
ng wrote:
E.

Premise 1
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.

Consideration : Whether it can be concluded ? that for a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly

Conclusion: The answer, Clearly, is yes i.e. For a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly

Explanation: Keyword 'Since' The amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

Conclusion rests on premise of the argument and the explanation offered to support it.

With that said lets look at the options.

A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.

---No content identified .

B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.

--- Support provided but no content identified

C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument.

---Irrelevant

D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.

--- Irrelevant

E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument. Yes !

Perfect explanation...Its E no doubt.

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 195

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: California

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2007, 17:01
ricokevin wrote:
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument.
D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

OA: E

E

The second one provides support. This means only A and E can be correct answers. Now if you read carefully then you will realize that first bold section is NOT the conclusion itself. This eliminates A. Hence E is the answer

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 350

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2007, 07:30
Thanks

Had to decide between A and E. Got wrong again on a 50:50 thing.

I hate it when this happens.

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2007, 11:17
ricokevin wrote:
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Deltaâ€™s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the conclusion of the argument.
D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

OA: E

E

Kudos [?]: 863 [0], given: 10

Re: CR - boldface   [#permalink] 14 Apr 2007, 11:17
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.