It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 23:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Demographers doing research for an international

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2003
Posts: 261

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: sydney
Demographers doing research for an international  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Apr 2004, 22:31
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Demographers doing research for an international
economics newsletter claim that the average per
capita income in the country of Kuptala is sub-
stantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.
They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is
relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population
of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of
the demographersтАЩ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of
the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average
per capita incomes in the two countries
without making any attempt to discredit that
claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term тАЬpovertyтАЭ as though it
had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people
in the two countries who live in poverty could be the
same even though the percentages of the two
populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the
same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes
in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all
be very close to the countryтАЩs average per
capita income.

E and C are contenders, but why one is wrong and other is right.
_________________

When u r about to make ends meet, someone moves the ends.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Dec 2003
Posts: 366

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 03:29
mbamantra wrote:
Demographers doing research for an international
economics newsletter claim that the average per
capita income in the country of Kuptala is sub-
stantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.
They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is
relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population
of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of
the demographersтАЩ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of
the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average
per capita incomes in the two countries
without making any attempt to discredit that
claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term тАЬpovertyтАЭ as though it
had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people
in the two countries who live in poverty could be the
same even though the percentages of the two
populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the
same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes
in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all
be very close to the countryтАЩs average per
capita income.

E and C are contenders, but why one is wrong and other is right.

It should be "E" then bcoz "C" stated "there should be consideration of percentage in palce of no of people" but it is wrong bcoz question stem uses the percentage itself.

Dharmin

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 651

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 08:12
I thought an real world example would help to clear the doubt.

In US, Bill gates' wealth is more than the sum of the bottom 100 Million
peoples wealth. When you take average on the popluation, every one is
wealthy. Are they really wealthy ? That is why statiscians go for median
rathen than mean!

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 08:32
I thought an real world example would help to clear the doubt.

In US, Bill gates' wealth is more than the sum of the bottom 100 Million
peoples wealth. When you take average on the popluation, every one is
wealthy. Are they really wealthy ? That is why statiscians go for median
rathen than mean!

_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 527 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

20 Apr 2004, 09:47
Add Enron and MCI executives to the list.

One more vote for E.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

20 Apr 2004, 09:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by