It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 08:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Demographers doing research for an international

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Demographers doing research for an international  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2004, 20:43
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

6. Demographers doing research for an international
economics newsletter claim that the average per
capita income in the country of Kuptala is sub-
stantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton.
They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is
relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population
of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of
the demographersâ€™ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of
the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average
per capita incomes in the two countries
without making any attempt to discredit that
claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term â€œpovertyâ€

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 154

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

Location: san jose,ca

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2004, 21:18
C.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people
in the two countries who live in poverty could be the
same even though the percentages of the two
populations that live in poverty differ markedly.

More of math than verbal.
_________________

GS
No excuses - Need 750!!!

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2004, 21:36
GoalStanford

The argument says that the poverty in Kuptala is rare which can be taken as negligible, so the number and percentage association does not hold good. Whats wrong with A?

Bhai

Kudos [?]: 174 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Location: Ukraine

### Show Tags

11 Jul 2004, 23:07
http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5787 with a really cool example by kpadma.

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 10:36
1:47 and E.

A. I almost thought it was a contender but not the best choice. Here,
the author does give some kind of additional empirical evidence to discredit the claim(50% of B live under poverty). But just giving any econominc advice is not enough to discredit the claim. It has to be valid.

B. I think this answer is just to distract us

C. This possibility does not make the argument vulnerable. The population of the two countries could be same and the % of people living under poverty could still differ.

D. Another distraction.

Best choice is E. All the incomes in country K are near average, and incomes in country B could widely vary from the average. This is a possibility that makes the argument weak/vulnerable.

- ash
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

13 Jul 2004, 10:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Demographers doing research for an international

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.