GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 10:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Demographers doing research for an international economics

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Posts: 40
Re: CR : Weaken (demographers claim average per capita income)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2013, 10:44
nusmavrik wrote:
P1 : Per ca pita income of K < B
P2 : Poverty is rare in K but half the population of B live in extreme poverty
Conclusion : One of the premises (claims) is wrong.

Well this argument is flawed because its making a hasty generalization. If the incomes (per ca pita income) in K are close to country's average then K is indeed prosperous. hence E.

C : It does not critiques the argument.


Hi! Could you please elaborate on "C : It does not critiques the argument"?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Persevering
Joined: 15 May 2013
Posts: 184
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Leadership
GMAT Date: 08-02-2013
GPA: 3.7
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2013, 11:24
E, Per capita income is the average income for year. So only option E correctly critiques the conclusion.

Option E, correctly critiques the argument by pointing out, that the income of most of the people is very close to the average income(per capita);hence, the claims of both demographer's will hold.
_________________

--It's one thing to get defeated, but another to accept it.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 70
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Apr 2014, 14:32
Hi,
Could anyone please explain what's wrong with option (b).
If the term poverty doesn't has a universally accepted meaning and thus, in both nations, poverty has a different meaning, then may be in bahlton people who are referred to be living in extreme poverty, they are of the same economical level as people who are considered poor in kuptala.
Though option (e) is also right but I was mainly confused between these two options...
Thanks in advance!!

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Preparing for GMAT
Joined: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 15
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Leadership
GMAT 1: 530 Q46 V18
WE: Other (Entertainment and Sports)
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2014, 04:40
Can anyone please explain why option A is incorrect.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8288
Location: Pune, India
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2014, 22:33
2
suhaschan wrote:
Can anyone please explain why option A is incorrect.


Could you first explain why you feel (A) is correct? Is it because of the complicated language? If you come across such an option, you should skip to others to figure out if you have a clear winner in others. They use complicated language only to play with your mind. Don't get bogged down by it. Read it carefully and analyze it, if you must.

The conclusion says: At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The two claims are
Claim 1: average per capita income in Kuptala is substantially lower than that in Bahlton
Claim 2: poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty

Option (A) says: "It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without ..."
Option (A) says: "It rejects claim 1 without ..."

Does the conclusion reject claim 1? No, not at all! It says one of the two must be wrong. It doesn't reject either one.

So option (A) is wrong.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jan 2014
Posts: 11
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Nov 2014, 06:04
can someone please throw light on option "C " :roll: .
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8288
Location: Pune, India
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2014, 22:27
vijaykumar1299 wrote:
can someone please throw light on option "C " :roll: .


The 'actual number of people living in poverty' has no relevance for our argument. We are discussing the percentage of population living in poverty and comparing that (which makes sense) - the 'actual number of people living in poverty' is not a comparable number and doesn't give any information about relative levels of poverty in the two countries. Hence, the actual number of people is irrelevant to our argument.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2013
Posts: 18
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.51
Reviews Badge
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Feb 2015, 23:07
'avg per capita income', this is the crux.
So avg per capita income = total income of city/ population of city.
we need to weaken the argument. Now if City B has 10 really big big billionaires then even if there is 1000 people, the avg would be high. But if in City K there are no billionaires but all working people and pop is still 1000, then the avg would be well kinda avg, but there wouldnt be poor people as all in City K are working ! (assumption yea)
(A)It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.----- Just words. doesnt mean anything. so strike out
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it
had a precise and universally accepted meaning.--- Again just words. Strike out.
(C)It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.---- Ok, maybe. since City B could have much lower population and City K higher population. But look at the statement again. Nowhere does it speak about % of poverty with population. in fact the words say 'relatively rare in city K', which means poverty just is rare. So strike out.
(D)It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the
same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.--- Again words. Stirke out.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes
in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all
be very close to the country’s average per
capita income. ----[color=#0000ff] Now this is gonna fit exactly under the assumption.[/color]
Current Student
avatar
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 152
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2015, 02:07
If we see the options , option E provides one loophole and that loophole is that it signifies the having a large number of people who have low income still the average income could be lesser than a country where few people are there but are extremely rich..hope this explanation helps.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 42
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V38
GPA: 3.1
Reviews Badge
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2016, 08:42
2
Lets just say :-

Per Capita Income :- Kuptala<Bahlton

Poverty :- Kuptala<Bahlton

Both can only be true if There is a Huuuuuge Middle Class i.e. people earning the average.

hence option e..

I know everyone says dont bring outside knowledge, but question like these its okay if you try to learn it in a language that you are most comfortable in .
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 547
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2016, 06:35
Two extreme values in the set could alter the average and the obtained value is used to make an analysis for per capita calculation.

E points out this flaw
Current Student
User avatar
B
Status: DONE!
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 390
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Nov 2016, 17:02
E makes perfect sense.

Here's the logic: if K has income/capita < B's income/capita --> it is very possible that because K has a lower poverty rate than B then K's residents could be closer to the average ratio than B's residents are to theirs.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Posts: 84
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Nov 2016, 03:49
snipertrader wrote:
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.


Deconstruct the argument:
Avg per capita income in B is higher than K. poverty in K is rare.

How we can achieve this condition at same time:
Lets say Avg for K is 100 and B is 200. Now if all people in K earns from range of 90-110 they are in range of average and NOT POOR. For B half of people earn around 400 and half earn 0. Then average will be around 200.

Check option with this possibility: "E"
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 539
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Organizational Behavior
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2017, 02:35
Found the explanation at the following URL best-
https://crackverbal.com/forum/threads/q ... -research/
_________________

------------------------------
"Trust the timing of your life"
Hit Kudus if this has helped you get closer to your goal, and also to assist others save time. Tq :)

Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 518
Premium Member
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2017, 21:29
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Oct 2017
Posts: 9
Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2017, 03:11
I have one question for option B

1. Lets say having less than 100 USD is called poverty in Bahlton and having less than 10 USD is called poverty in Kuptala
Now if a person earns 30 USD, he will be declared Rich for Kaptala and Poor for Bahlton

Although E is correct. B is not wrong I think


Can some expert throw light why am i wrong?

snipertrader wrote:
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Oct 2017
Posts: 9
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2017, 03:14
Dear Expert,

I have one question for option B

1. Lets say having less than 100 USD is called poverty in Bahlton and having less than 10 USD is called poverty in Kuptala
Now if a person earns 30 USD, he will be declared Rich for Kaptala and Poor for Bahlton

Although E is correct. B is not wrong I think


Can you please tell me why am i wrong?
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1789
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 02:59
VeritasPrepKarishma
, the source of this question is so dubious.
I think gmat should have a forum for questions whose sources are not quite clear.
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8288
Location: Pune, India
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 05:04
chesstitans wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma
, the source of this question is so dubious.
I think gmat should have a forum for questions whose sources are not quite clear.


Yes, the source of the question may not be known but the question is not ambiguous.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1789
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: CR demographers doing research  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Jan 2018, 09:26
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
chesstitans wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma
, the source of this question is so dubious.
I think gmat should have a forum for questions whose sources are not quite clear.


Yes, the source of the question may not be known but the question is not ambiguous.


hello, I still do not understand why B and C are incorrect?
Pls help me. Thank you.
Re: CR demographers doing research &nbs [#permalink] 10 Jan 2018, 09:26

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 43 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Demographers doing research for an international economics

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.