It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 03:59

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Demographers doing research for an international economics

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 431
Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking
Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 18:50
1
KUDOS
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:28) correct 42% (01:48) wrong based on 624 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 305
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 19:37
2
KUDOS
Phew!! Tough one bro

Got hung between C and E.

(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning. -- poverty needs to be defined as same for both the countries. universally sounds broad.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton. - out of scope
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.

IMO E. I think C is wrong because the premise talks about absolute numbers in giving the poverty statistics and not the percentages.
Manager
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 164
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 19:58
I vote for E
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2009
Posts: 43
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 20:03
1
KUDOS
IMO E

People in Kuptala might not be poor because all of them earn the same i.e the national average capita income which is nt the case for Bahlton.
A says that no attempt was made to discredit the claim which is wrng too because evidence of poorer people was provided to contrast the claim.
The others are irrelevant.
Senior Manager
Affiliations: ACA, CPA
Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 431
Location: Vagabond
Schools: BC
WE 1: Big4, Audit
WE 2: Banking
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2009, 22:08
1
KUDOS
OA is E.

I was also stuck with C or E. Nice reasoning Acer

THanks all.
_________________

If you have made mistakes, there is always another chance for you. You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2007
Posts: 23
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2009, 05:37
1
KUDOS
E it is

In kuptala's case majority of the population earns, about the same as the national average and in Bahlton's case, there is a huge disparity in the earnings of the population. Only this weakens the conclusion
Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Posts: 53
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2009, 08:39
agree with C
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 818
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2009, 01:29
Nice Question!
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jul 2009
Posts: 251
Location: New York, NY
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2009, 11:53
1
KUDOS
E.

C is wrong, becuase the argument DOES consider the percentage when it says "half" the population lives in poverty. Half is a percentage, not a number.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2009
Posts: 347
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2009, 01:47
Good question. Tests concept of 'average'.
Intern
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2010, 19:45
Definitely E.....

assume incomes of K to be --- A-1, A-1, A-1...... A-1, A+1 A+1 A+1 A+1 (Av=A)
now incomes of B (half are very poor so the other half people must be very rich so that the average income of the whole increase) say A-10 A-15 A-20 A-12 ....... A+20 A+31 (Av=A+1)
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 200
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 03:06
so nice a question
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10167
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2014, 14:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10167
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Dec 2015, 11:56
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2015
Posts: 54
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V38
GPA: 3.1
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2016, 08:42
1
KUDOS
Lets just say :-

Per Capita Income :- Kuptala<Bahlton

Poverty :- Kuptala<Bahlton

Both can only be true if There is a Huuuuuge Middle Class i.e. people earning the average.

hence option e..

I know everyone says dont bring outside knowledge, but question like these its okay if you try to learn it in a language that you are most comfortable in .
Chat Moderator
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 473
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2016, 06:35
Two extreme values in the set could alter the average and the obtained value is used to make an analysis for per capita calculation.

E points out this flaw
Senior Manager
Status: DONE!
Joined: 05 Sep 2016
Posts: 409
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Nov 2016, 17:02
E makes perfect sense.

Here's the logic: if K has income/capita < B's income/capita --> it is very possible that because K has a lower poverty rate than B then K's residents could be closer to the average ratio than B's residents are to theirs.
Manager
Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Posts: 91
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2016, 03:49
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.

Deconstruct the argument:
Avg per capita income in B is higher than K. poverty in K is rare.

How we can achieve this condition at same time:
Lets say Avg for K is 100 and B is 200. Now if all people in K earns from range of 90-110 they are in range of average and NOT POOR. For B half of people earn around 400 and half earn 0. Then average will be around 200.

Check option with this possibility: "E"
Re: Demographers doing research for an international economics   [#permalink] 29 Nov 2016, 03:49
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
38 A musicologist doing research in an early music archive in London has 29 19 Apr 2017, 03:10
4 Scientific research that involves international collaborati 2 10 Apr 2015, 09:32
3 Demographers doing research for an international economics 6 21 Feb 2015, 02:07
8 Demographers doing research for an international economics 10 23 Apr 2017, 06:58
12 CR demographers doing research 12 16 Jul 2016, 23:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by