Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 10:37

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 192
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 192 [2] , given: 66

Show Tags

05 Jan 2012, 21:17
2
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:23) correct 42% (01:32) wrong based on 767 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable decline in sales revenue for its most recent fiscal year. This result appears surprising, because electronics retailers report that although their overall sales were considerably lower than in the previous year, their sales revenue from Denoma models actually grew, largely thanks to some innovative and popular models that Denoma introduced.
Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently surprising result?

A. Because of the need to educate the public about its new models’ capabilities, Denoma’s advertising spending was higher than normal over the period.
B. For the period at issue, Denoma’s major competitors reported declines in revenue that were, in percentage terms, greater than Denoma’s.
C. A significant proportion of Denoma’s revenue comes from making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers.
D. Unlike some of its major competitors, Denoma has no lines of business outside consumer electronics to provide revenue when retail sales of consumer electronics are weak.
E. During the period, consumer-electronics retailers sold remaining units of Denoma’s superseded models at prices that were deeply discounted from those models’ original prices.

Can someone please explain what this Argument is saying. I am really having trouble interpreting what is saying and I have read through endless posts through Google, but they make abosolutely no sense.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [2] , given: 42

Show Tags

06 Jan 2012, 02:19
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
the argument talks about an consumer electronics maker Denoma,which had a sizeable decline in sales revenue for that particular year. this result comes as a surprise to everyone because according to retailers of electronic goods( the people who sell electronics), although there was a decline in overall sales of electronic goods but the goods manufactured by denoma had increased sales revenue compared to last year. this was largely due to innovation and popularity of newly introduced models of denoma.

so what we have from the argument is basically
-increase in sales revenue from the models manufactured by denoma.
-overall decline in sales of electronic goods.
-overall decline in sales revenue for Denoma.
how can one explain this effect?
if we can assume denoma is also into manufacturing of parts for other electronic goods manufacturers and the revenue from these parts is is much more significant compared to revenue from denoma models, then the above three effects can be explained.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 556

Kudos [?]: 1070 [3] , given: 2

Show Tags

06 Jan 2012, 18:22
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
So let’s take apart the argument.

Denoma (D.), a consumer-electronic maker, has seen a decrease in sales in the past year. However, D. provides products to retailers, which saw an increase in the sale of D.’s products. How to account for this?

Well, maybe D.’s profits are not solely determined by the number of its products users are able to sell. Maybe, D. creates parts for products that do not have the D. label on them.

For example, let’s say retailers sold D.s new line of home stereos. Units flew off the shelf. However, D. makes a number of parts for many televisions, which do not have the D. label (let’s say for Sony, Panasonic and the rest) If most of D.’s profits are determined by the sale of televisions, then if televisions had a bad year, D.’s profits will decline. This is the case, even with retailers selling plenty of D’s stereos.

The only answer choice that captures this logic is (C).

Let me know that if that helped!
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1672
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 103

Kudos [?]: 992 [1] , given: 109

Show Tags

06 Jan 2012, 22:12
1
KUDOS
+1 C
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 0

Show Tags

07 Jan 2012, 06:26
1
KUDOS
+1 C
Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 192
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 192 [0], given: 66

Show Tags

10 Jan 2012, 12:14
Sorry about he late reply. @ChrisLele and @d3thknell Thank you so much for your posts. This really makes sense now. Basically I understand partially what happened. D's overall Sales Revenue Decreased, but the Sales of certain Models increased. I understand how Choice C explains at a basic level. But I dont see how the Answer has any effect on "Sales of Certain Models Increased"
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2011
Posts: 80
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 42

Show Tags

11 Jan 2012, 02:38
the answer should be able to sufficiently resolve the paradox given in the question.don't u agree option C does that?
it is true that C does not explain why sales of certain models increased,but that is outside the scope of question.
However the last line of the para says " their sales revenue from Denoma models actually grew, largely thanks to some innovative and popular models that Denoma introduced"
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 32
Schools: HBS, Yale, Darden, Haas
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

11 Jan 2012, 09:43
+ 1 C
Intern
Joined: 07 Nov 2011
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 9

Show Tags

11 Jan 2012, 19:18
ChrisLele wrote:
So let’s take apart the argument.

Denoma (D.), a consumer-electronic maker, has seen a decrease in sales in the past year. However, D. provides products to retailers, which saw an increase in the sale of D.’s products. How to account for this?

Well, maybe D.’s profits are not solely determined by the number of its products users are able to sell. Maybe, D. creates parts for products that do not have the D. label on them.

For example, let’s say retailers sold D.s new line of home stereos. Units flew off the shelf. However, D. makes a number of parts for many televisions, which do not have the D. label (let’s say for Sony, Panasonic and the rest) If most of D.’s profits are determined by the sale of televisions, then if televisions had a bad year, D.’s profits will decline. This is the case, even with retailers selling plenty of D’s stereos.

The only answer choice that captures this logic is (C).

Let me know that if that helped!

What is wrong with A)
Manager
Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 104
Location: Mexico
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.85
WE: Sales (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 147 [2] , given: 4

Show Tags

25 Jun 2012, 23:35
2
KUDOS
I was caught between C and E.

I chose E, because I considered the following assumptions:

1. Retailers made sizeble purchases of Denoma's products last year.
2. Only one product was sold full price by retailers the previous year.
3. As Retailers wanted to rid themselves of the non selling stock, they offered a deep discount.
4. Retailers sold all of their Denoma's Stock, and therefore made more Revenues of Denoma's products than previous year.

Nevertheless, after reading the stimulus again, I realized that E can not be, as the sales that retailers report grew largely thanks to some innovative and popular models that Denoma Introduced.

C it is... I guess the next time I get caught between 2 options I will look back again to the stimulus to find some scope narrowing wording.

Keep walking!!
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

26 Jun 2012, 04:08
Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable decline in sales revenue for its most recent fiscal year. This result appears surprising, because electronics retailers report that although their overall sales were considerably lower than in the previous year, their sales revenue from Denoma models actually grew, largely thanks to some innovative and popular models that Denoma introduced.
Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the apparently surprising result?

A. Because of the need to educate the public about its new models’ capabilities, Denoma’s advertising spending was higher than normal over the period.
B. For the period at issue, Denoma’s major competitors reported declines in revenue that were, in percentage terms, greater than Denoma’s.
retailers have not reported a positive growth for Denoma as comapred to competitors but a growth in Denoma models as compared to past year Denoma sales .
C. A significant proportion of Denoma’s revenue comes from making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers.
Only plausible option for increment in Denoma's sales .
D. Unlike some of its major competitors, Denoma has no lines of business outside consumer electronics to provide revenue when retail sales of consumer electronics are weak.
does not support statement that Denoma sales increased
E. During the period, consumer-electronics retailers sold remaining units of Denoma’s superseded models at prices that were deeply discounted from those models’ original prices
The retailers report sales of innovative models which have been recently introduced
Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 541
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 75

Show Tags

26 Jun 2012, 06:55
Ofcourse C

Let's keep it short and simple, the argument states that:
-Overall revenue of company has declined BUT
-The retail sales has done good business
It means that, the overall decremented revenue is not directly related to the retail sales ONLY.Something else is responsible for the overall sales/revenue decline.

Only C states that a substantial revenue is dependent on something else too ( "A significant proportion of Denoma’s revenue comes from making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers.")
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 251 [0], given: 29

Show Tags

26 Jun 2012, 07:31
what is wrong with option e
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2009
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

22 Sep 2012, 13:17
E is irrelevant.

The argument is that the sales of electronic retailers increased from INNOVATIVE and POPULAR models so the discussion superseded models is irrelevant to the argument.
Director
Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Posts: 885
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 1192 [0], given: 543

Show Tags

19 Jul 2013, 08:48
Totally missed the innovative models part and fell for the E trap choice. Good question
_________________

Click +1 Kudos if my post helped...

Amazing Free video explanation for all Quant questions from OG 13 and much more http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13th/

GMAT Prep software What if scenarios http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-software-analysis-and-what-if-scenarios-146146.html

Intern
Joined: 11 Jun 2013
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Show Tags

21 Jul 2013, 07:35
But what is wrong with C.
I see that the revenue has declined, but the retail sales have increased. Now we have to fill this gap. It can be filled with the advertising costs. And also the statement clearly says "thanks to new models" . It means that there are new models which did come. However, if manufacturing of other spare parts is concerned, I think it is irrelevant. It might be it is gaining for those spare parts, charging the same amount from the companies as earlier, and the other companies, in spite of already being in loss, may be buying those parts at more prices. How can you be certain on this?

thevenus wrote:
Ofcourse C

Let's keep it short and simple, the argument states that:
-Overall revenue of company has declined BUT
-The retail sales has done good business
It means that, the overall decremented revenue is not directly related to the retail sales ONLY.Something else is responsible for the overall sales/revenue decline.

Only C states that a substantial revenue is dependent on something else too ( "A significant proportion of Denoma’s revenue comes from making components for other consumer-electronics manufacturers.")
Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2014
Posts: 69
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 77

Show Tags

11 Feb 2014, 23:32
fozzzy wrote:
Totally missed the innovative models part and fell for the E trap choice. Good question

Yeah, I miss the same point. Good question.
Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2013
Posts: 92
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 17

Show Tags

20 Oct 2014, 08:49
ChrisLele wrote:
So let’s take apart the argument.

Denoma (D.), a consumer-electronic maker, has seen a decrease in sales in the past year. However, D. provides products to retailers, which saw an increase in the sale of D.’s products. How to account for this?

Well, maybe D.’s profits are not solely determined by the number of its products users are able to sell. Maybe, D. creates parts for products that do not have the D. label on them.

For example, let’s say retailers sold D.s new line of home stereos. Units flew off the shelf. However, D. makes a number of parts for many televisions, which do not have the D. label (let’s say for Sony, Panasonic and the rest) If most of D.’s profits are determined by the sale of televisions, then if televisions had a bad year, D.’s profits will decline. This is the case, even with retailers selling plenty of D’s stereos.

The only answer choice that captures this logic is (C).

Let me know that if that helped!

i am not clear on this.
C may clear about the reasons for increased sales of the retailers. It definitely does not clear the fact as to why did Denoma experience a decrease in its revenue..

E where as clears both the reaons viz why did the retailers have an increase in their sales and why did Denoma experience a decrease in its revenue
Manager
Joined: 23 Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 40

Show Tags

20 Oct 2014, 17:34
The winner is 'C' but the reasoning outlined above by Chris is flawed. The argument does not talk about profits. The argument clearly talks about revenue. The answer is C because the author is implying that company D's main revenue source is from making parts/components for other Electronic companies. If that is the case then fewer pieces of electronics sold (other companies') = fewer parts required to be manufactured by company D. HTH!
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10366
Followers: 999

Kudos [?]: 225 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

28 Nov 2015, 10:48
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable   [#permalink] 28 Nov 2015, 10:48

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Following a major mishap, a pilgrim spot in the country had 2 31 Oct 2015, 13:16
35 Violin Makers in Italy 17 15 Apr 2017, 19:18
3 Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable 1 21 Apr 2012, 19:43
24 CR - Decision Makers 18 26 Aug 2016, 18:55
2 Denoma, a major consumer-electronics maker, had a sizeable 11 19 Jan 2012, 09:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by