GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 14 Aug 2018, 22:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 May 2008
Posts: 75
Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2010, 11:31
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

72% (01:33) correct 28% (02:02) wrong based on 360 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has resulted in supply disruptions and in higher prices for consumers. Properly understood, however, this phenomenon does not cast doubt on the economic principle that free-market competition is generally more efficient than state planning. Certain particularities of electricity as a commodity - including the impossibility of storing electricity, the inelasticity of demand for electricity, and the high barriers to entry for new producers - are peculiar obstacles to the creation of competitive electricity markets.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a historical claim that the author rejects; the second is the theoretical basis for his rejection of that claim.
B.The first describes an apparent exception to a theory that the author accepts as true; the second is that theory.
C.The first is the basis for the author's critique of conventional economics; the second is his summary of conventional economic thought.
D.The first describes an event that the author believes to be unusual; the second is the author's explanation of why this unusual event occured.
E.The first is a particular example of a broader trend; the second is that trend.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 257
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 May 2010, 12:37
1
sh00nya wrote:
Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has resulted in supply disruptions and in higher prices for consumers. Properly understood, however, this phenomenon does not cast doubt on the economic principle that free-market competition is generally more efficient than state planning. Certain particularities of electricity as a commodity - including the impossibility of storing electricity, the inelasticity of demand for electricity, and the high barriers to entry for new producers - are peculiar obstacles to the creation of competitive electricity markets.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a historical claim that the author rejects; the second is the theoretical basis for his rejection of that claim.>>> First statement is not a "historical claim".
B.The first describes an apparent exception to a theory that the author accepts as true; the second is that theory. >>> IMO, Correct
C.The first is the basis for the author's critique of conventional economics; the second is his summary of conventional economic thought. >>> Nothing has been said about conventional economics
D.The first describes an event that the author believes to be unusual; the second is the author's explanation of why this unusual event occured. >>> Second is a generalization/theory
E.The first is a particular example of a broader trend; the second is that trend.>>> First is an unusual example..


OA plz.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Affiliations: SPG
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 309
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 May 2010, 03:34
IMO C

A.The first is a historical claim that the author rejects; the second is the theoretical basis for his rejection of that claim. the first boldface is not rejected by the author
B.The first describes an apparent exception to a theory that the author accepts as true; the second is that theory. the first boldface is not an exception to a theory as author states that in the second sentence
C.The first is the basis for the author's critique of conventional economics; the second is his summary of conventional economic thought. Correct
D.The first describes an event that the author believes to be unusual; the second is the author's explanation of why this unusual event occured.
Close contender for Correct answer. However, I don't think the author finds the even unusual
E.The first is a particular example of a broader trend; the second is that trend.[/quote]
The first is not a trend
_________________

press kudos, if you like the explanation, appreciate the effort or encourage people to respond.

Download the Ultimate SC Flashcards

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1260
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 May 2010, 13:15
Is my analysis correct????

The theory is " free-market competition is generally more efficient than state planning" ===> meaning ==> state regulated (state planning) ==> no competition ==> hence less efficient

In U.S. ==> deregulation (no state regulation) has managed the competition (which is an exception to the theory)

Hence B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 133
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 May 2010, 01:48
4
sh00nya wrote:
Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has resulted in supply disruptions and in higher prices for consumers. Properly understood, however, this phenomenon does not cast doubt on the economic principle that free-market competition is generally more efficient than state planning. Certain particularities of electricity as a commodity - including the impossibility of storing electricity, the inelasticity of demand for electricity, and the high barriers to entry for new producers - are peculiar obstacles to the creation of competitive electricity markets.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a historical claim that the author rejects; the second is the theoretical basis for his rejection of that claim.
B.The first describes an apparent exception to a theory that the author accepts as true; the second is that theory.
C.The first is the basis for the author's critique of conventional economics; the second is his summary of conventional economic thought.
D.The first describes an event that the author believes to be unusual; the second is the author's explanation of why this unusual event occured.
E.The first is a particular example of a broader trend; the second is that trend.


Tip on Bold-face questions: Do not try to formulate a relationship between the two portions in bold!! Instead, your job is to track the relationship between each sentence/clause and the preceding sentence.

Thus, the first sentence (in bold) says that deregulation made the electricity market (specific) inefficient.

The second sentence (note the 'however') says that this specific case does not cast doubt on a general principle-- just the principle is in bold! Interpretation: The author is not critiquing the principle.

The remainder of the argument explains why the principle still holds despite the exceptional case.

Answer: B indeed!

If this helped, kindly give Kudos! :wink: For more CR tips, check out gmaxonline
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 121
GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2011, 06:30
thanks for this! :-D

SaraiGMAXonline wrote:
sh00nya wrote:
Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has resulted in supply disruptions and in higher prices for consumers. Properly understood, however, this phenomenon does not cast doubt on the economic principle that free-market competition is generally more efficient than state planning. Certain particularities of electricity as a commodity - including the impossibility of storing electricity, the inelasticity of demand for electricity, and the high barriers to entry for new producers - are peculiar obstacles to the creation of competitive electricity markets.

In the above argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a historical claim that the author rejects; the second is the theoretical basis for his rejection of that claim.
B.The first describes an apparent exception to a theory that the author accepts as true; the second is that theory.
C.The first is the basis for the author's critique of conventional economics; the second is his summary of conventional economic thought.
D.The first describes an event that the author believes to be unusual; the second is the author's explanation of why this unusual event occured.
E.The first is a particular example of a broader trend; the second is that trend.


Tip on Bold-face questions: Do not try to formulate a relationship between the two portions in bold!! Instead, your job is to track the relationship between each sentence/clause and the preceding sentence.

Thus, the first sentence (in bold) says that deregulation made the electricity market (specific) inefficient.

The second sentence (note the 'however') says that this specific case does not cast doubt on a general principle-- just the principle is in bold! Interpretation: The author is not critiquing the principle.

The remainder of the argument explains why the principle still holds despite the exceptional case.

Answer: B indeed!

If this helped, kindly give Kudos! :wink: For more CR tips, check out gmaxonline

_________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 175
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE: Operations (Insurance)
Re: [CR] Market Deregulation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2011, 12:23
IMO it is B. The first theory is an exception to the theory generally accepted, which is the second statement
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 822
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2013, 10:36
1:45

B it is.

(1).No state planning leaded to => Supply disruption+Higher prices.
(2).However,acc. to thry "Free market + no State planning " = > is good for economy.

So, (1) is an exception to thry.

(2). Is that thry

Rgds,
TGC
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: IF YOU CAN DREAM IT, YOU CAN DO IT
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 209
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2017, 03:36
I have a trouble understanding this complete argument. Can someone help me understand this in some better. Thank you
Re: Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has &nbs [#permalink] 24 Nov 2017, 03:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Deregulation of electricity markets in the United States has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.