Here you go again,
imSKR, picking apart finer details when the larger picture is a better guide. My responses below.
imSKR wrote:
Hi
AndrewN GMATNinja One doubt again popped up in mind, Hope to get clarity on this.
Quote:
Despite Japan’s relative isolation from world trade at the time, the prolonged peace during the Tokugawa shogunate produced an almost explosive expansion of commerce.
Quote:
(C) being relatively isolated from world trade at the time, the prolonged peace during Japan’s Tokugawa shogunate
In C, 1st phrase ( Despite xx the time) wrongly modifies prolonged peace. It wrongly gives the meaning that prolonged peace was being relatively isolated from world at the time.
But in A , it does not wrongly modify prolonged peace?
Quote:
(A) Japan’s relative isolation from world trade at the time, the prolonged peace during the Tokugawa shogunate
Why in A the meaning could be interpreted as : the prolonged peace was japan's relative isolated from world trade.
Wrongly modify.
Actually I rejected A with this approach in my first attempt.
No, the opening phrase in (A) is not the same as the one in (C). Notice that in the original sentence, we have a subject within that phrase,
Japan's relative isolation, whereas in (C), we delay that subject until the phrase has resolved (i.e. what was
relatively isolated?). Furthermore, we can in (A) reasonably carry over our understanding that the sentence is commenting on Japan, even though it is not an absolute certainty. That is, since the opening phrase mentions the relative isolation of Japan and no other country within a
despite framework, we are led to believe that the sentence after the comma will resolve some information pertaining to Japan. Again, (C) delays this vital information about location, so the sentence is not grounded in the same way by the time we cross the comma.
imSKR wrote:
2. Despite X was xxx, Y was yyy
I think X and Y should be of similar entities.
E.g. Despite He ran faster, I overcame him. ( He and I right comparison)
But I would not say: Despite not running fast, pain was not in his knees. I would prefer say: Despite not running fast, he xxx .( who was running fast - he: makes sense)
Similarly in A , whose Japan’s relative isolation from world trade at the time? Peace? - should not make sense.
Please clarify.
Where does this apparent rule of similar entities come from? Notice, too, that the original sentence does not adopt an -ing opening phrase. The contextual clues allow us to interpret the sentence in a similar way to the following:
1)
Despite Japan’s relative isolation from world trade at the time, Japan's prolonged peace during the Tokugawa shogunate produced an almost explosive expansion of commerce.Or, if you prefer a more formal version:
2)
Despite the relative isolation of Japan from world trade at the time, the prolonged peace in Japan during the Tokugawa shogunate produced an almost explosive expansion of commerce.The takeaway is not to apply so-called rules too strictly, particularly when you might be missing questions because of them. Focus on the overall meaning based on the information available. A microscopic look is fine at times, but just make sure you do not zoom in too much and miss the larger view.
I hope that helps. Thank you for thinking to ask me.
- Andrew
sir for recently pinpointing my weakness a number of times.
I will cautiously remember your words "A microscopic look is fine at times, but just make sure you do not zoom in too much and