It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 00:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 900

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Sep 2013, 21:20
ramannanda9 wrote:
TGC wrote:
As my doubt has not been answered in the previous posts, I am posting the same here.

As per MGMAT SC Guide, when we look at SV agreement we avoid the modifiers generally(Subordinate Clauses/ING/ED/OF).

However , when the subject is Quantity/fractions/SANAM(some-any-none-all-more/most) , we see the OF-CONSTRUCTION to decide on the verb.

So, in this question as the subject is "Proportion" we have to see the OF-construction which is PLURAL .
So Why Option(B). is not correct.

By solving this question I have realized that there is a deviation in MGMAT SC guide from what GMAC thinks.

Plz advise

Rgds,
TGC !


I do not think there is a conflict here in the sentence.

Try to think of it as a simple sentence. For example:

The proportion of students who have passed has not increased. Here sanam pronoun is properly being used so have correctly agrees with students, But proportion should be singular.
or
the proportion of students have/has not increased.



I don't think that you got my query.

Who is a referent of students so definitely it will have a plural verb.

However what MGMAT SC Guide states is that when a quantity/fraction/SANAM is there as the case here then we look at the OF-CONTRUCTION to decide upon the VERB for THIS SUBJECT.

And here "proportion" is a FRACTION , so why it has to agree with SINGULAR VERB?
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 860 [0], given: 322

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 47

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 12:10
Nsentra wrote:
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

Official Guide 12 Question

GMAT Official Guide 12

Question: 43
Page: 42
Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:


Ah.. The beauty of having multiple choices! It initially totally flew over my head that proportion is our subject and thus needs a singular verb. But as I read C, I noticed it.

A and B are gone since "have not" does not function with proportion

C) the proportion has not risen is correct.

D) "yet" is erroneously used. We introduce the sentence with despite, thus we cannot use "yet" in this case because that distorts the intended meaning. "Despite" acts as a contrasting element, so does "yet", thus yet is reduntant so we eliminate D/E.

Therefore, C is correct

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 47

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10170

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2015, 10:06
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 255 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Do or Die!!
Joined: 29 Jul 2013
Posts: 24

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 30

Location: India
Concentration: Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GPA: 3.86
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2015, 03:29
IMO C is correct
The proportion is singular and so:
The Proportion ... has not risen is correct SVA

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 30

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1411

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2015, 01:39
I do not like this question though it is official.

normaly, group noun is considered single as itis in this problem. but group noun can be considered plural and go with plural verb. we choose C because normaly group noun is considered single . this is why I do not like this problem. in many og questions, group noun can go with plural verb.

the testing of "proportion" as a single noun is not logic test and is not testing of a rule.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1411

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2015, 03:20
proportion of + count noun
is normally in singular

but can be in plural

if gmat test us this point, gmat test purely grammartical point, which is not gmat intent of gmat today

this question is old , right?
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 916

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 264

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Sep 2015, 00:24
'Despite' is sufficient to bring in the contrast. "Despite yet' is redundant.
A proportion is singular and hence needs has instead of have.


Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent 'have' is incorrect

(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably 'have' is incorrect

(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably has is the correct usage. Pls note that the auxiliary very 'are' refers to judges and partners

(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent Redundant

(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably Redundant
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 165

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Feb 2015
Posts: 113

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 101

Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2015, 00:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
Nsentra wrote:
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

Official Guide 12 Question

GMAT Official Guide 12

Question: 43
Page: 42
Difficulty: 600

Find All Official Guide Questions

Video Explanations:


Hi Harley1980

I need your insight on the above question please. I chose D , but that is incorrect. Please advise.

Thanks,
Rohan

Kudos [?]: 22 [1], given: 101

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Aug 2015
Posts: 396

Kudos [?]: 318 [2], given: 10

Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V44
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2015, 03:08
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
rohan89 wrote:

Hi Harley1980

I need your insight on the above question please. I chose D , but that is incorrect. Please advise.

Thanks,
Rohan


Hi Rohan,

Option D and option E have the problem of redundancy.
We should not use both yet and despite in the same sentence. Despite is in itself sufficient to bring the contrast

Options A and B have a problem of S-V agreement. Hence we are left with option C.

Does this help?
_________________

Reach out to us at bondwithus@gmatify.com

Image

Kudos [?]: 318 [2], given: 10

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 09 Dec 2015
Posts: 110

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 48

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.5
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2016, 03:54
D and E are wrong because both have 'yet' which does not go with despite.
B is wrong because it changes the meaning. We are not talking about proportion of women judges but of judges whi are women.
A is too wordy. C is a better choice than A so C is correct.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 48

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2015
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 12

Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2016, 10:24
why is has not risen correct. I know (now) the subject is proportion but i thought we have to use plural form if there is and. In this case we have two things, judges and partners. Shouldn't we use have been?

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 12

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 321

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 05:14
the answer should be C
but it is wordy as 'who' should follow the noun which is women not the law firms ,

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 321

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 05:19
ktkl68 wrote:
why is has not risen correct. I know (now) the subject is proportion but i thought we have to use plural form if there is and. In this case we have two things, judges and partners. Shouldn't we use have been?


hi
look why you can't use plural verb because the clause after comma has proportion as a singular noun so you have to follow the singular verb has, and also here the subject is proportion not women and partners . go to the basics of the sc guide you need to work more :)

hope it helps :wink:

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 42

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 06:03
I am not quite convinced with C. Please advice.

Isn't "who" modifying "major law firms", in A and C?
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 42

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Posts: 321

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: IIMB
GMAT 1: 550 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.96
WE: Human Resources (Retail Banking)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 06:51
rekhabishop wrote:
I am not quite convinced with C. Please advice.

Isn't "who" modifying "major law firms", in A and C?

Hey, look if we follow conciseation rule, then c is better over A, [SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]

Sent from my vivo 1601 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 88

Director
Director
User avatar
S
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 735

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 11

Location: Bangalore, India
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 06:57
rekhabishop wrote:
I am not quite convinced with C. Please advice.

Isn't "who" modifying "major law firms", in A and C?

Hi rekhabishop, who as a relative pronoun, can only modify persons.

Since major law firms is (obviously) not a person, who cannot modify major law firms.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana has a handy reference for Relative Pronoun usage. Have attached the corresponding section of the book, for your reference.
Attachments

Pronouns.pdf [35.02 KiB]
Downloaded 6 times

To download please login or register as a user


_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Kudos [?]: 300 [0], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 216

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 42

Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 07:22
nks2611 wrote:
rekhabishop wrote:
I am not quite convinced with C. Please advice.

Isn't "who" modifying "major law firms", in A and C?

Hey, look if we follow conciseation rule, then c is better over A, [SMILING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]

Sent from my vivo 1601 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app


But that should be the last principle, right? It doesn't take precedence over grammatical rules. I just feel that "who" is not modifying the correct nouns.
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 42

Top Contributor
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4273

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 10:30
Top Contributor
The grammar underlying the using of relative pronouns is that a relative pronoun can modify a slightly distant noun if it is not able to modify the word before it if logic doesn't permit and if the intervening phrase is essentially defining the eligible noun. (called a critical mission modifier by MGMAT)

Now let us look at choice C.

(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably ---
1. Logic does not permit the inanimate firms to be related to 'who'
2. 'at major law firms' is defining the noun 'partners' as the practitioners of law at these firms are called technically 'partners'
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7616 [0], given: 360

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 8812 [1], given: 328

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 14:39
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
rekhabishop wrote:

But that should be the last principle, right? It doesn't take precedence over grammatical rules. I just feel that "who" is not modifying the correct nouns.



Hello rekhabishop,

Although you have already gotten quite few explanations for your doubt, I would just like to add my two cents. It might just help. :-)

It is true that who and other relative pronoun modifiers modify the preceding noun entity. However, it is not necessary that this preceding noun entity will always be a single or double word noun entity. These modifier can also modify the preceding noun phrase.

This is what we see happening in Choice A and C of this official sentence.

In these choices, the noun modifier who modifies not the preceding noun word law firms but the preceding noun phrase judges and partners at major law firms.

There are two reasons for such modification:

Firstly, who cannot be used to refer to inanimate object. So who logically refers to judges and partners.

Secondly, this phrase at major law firms cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence without violating the intended meaning. Since at major law firms is meant to modify judges and partners, at major law firms has to be written close to this entity. This is the reason why who can jump over at major law firms to refer to judges and partners.

There are many official sentences in which noun modifiers modify a slightly far-away noun.

For more details, explanations, and official examples, please review our very famous article named Noun Modifiers can Modify slightly far away noun in the following link:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/noun-modifiers-can-modify-slightly-far-away-noun-135868.html


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 8812 [1], given: 328

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 413

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 99

Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 14:57
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

Quote:
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

'Yet' is redundant. 'Despite' already indicates that a change in direction will follow post the subordinate clause. Both are OUT.


Quote:
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably

The Subject is 'The proportion' - Singular
Main verb is 'have not' - Plural
Subject Verb Disagreement. Both are OUT!


Quote:
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

The only remaining answer choice, and the correct answer.
'The proportion' and 'has not' - Subject Verb Agreement
'who' correctly refers to 'the proportion of judges and partners'.

C is the answer.
_________________

Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 99

Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2017, 14:57

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 66 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.