GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 18 Jan 2020, 18:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Jan 2014
Posts: 138
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2014, 22:45
1
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent : plural verb for proportion
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably : plural verb for proportion
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent : Yet and despite in same scentence cant be used
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably : Yet and despite in same scentence cant be used
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Dec 2012
Posts: 116
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 12 Jan 2016, 23:21
Can some one help me in understanding the phrase "at major law firms who are women" --> Here its confusing that law firms being women.. Kindly help

Originally posted by sowragu on 12 Jan 2016, 23:19.
Last edited by sowragu on 12 Jan 2016, 23:21, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 07 Apr 2013
Posts: 9
CAT Tests
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2017, 03:16
Hi Expert,

I have a doubt in the option C
the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms "who" are women has not risen comparably.

The placement of who looks tricky in the sense, to what it is referring to, the law firms or the women.

Could you please advice.

I take was option D bit I ignored the 'yet' part.
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 156
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 07:22
But that should be the last principle, right? It doesn't take precedence over grammatical rules. I just feel that "who" is not modifying the correct nouns.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5274
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2017, 10:30
Top Contributor
1
The grammar underlying the using of relative pronouns is that a relative pronoun can modify a slightly distant noun if it is not able to modify the word before it if logic doesn't permit and if the intervening phrase is essentially defining the eligible noun. (called a critical mission modifier by MGMAT)

Now let us look at choice C.

(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably ---
1. Logic does not permit the inanimate firms to be related to 'who'
2. 'at major law firms' is defining the noun 'partners' as the practitioners of law at these firms are called technically 'partners'
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509), <newnaren@gmail.com>
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2017
Posts: 32
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2018, 21:36
I understand that C is the best option among all but doesn't "who" in C refer incorrectly to firms rather than the proportion of women ? It is a strict rule when it comes to relative pronouns such as who, which etc.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 23 May 2017
Posts: 230
Concentration: Finance, Accounting
WE: Programming (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2018, 15:49
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations,
the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.

(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent

(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably

(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent

(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

in D & E - Use of two contrast words are incorrect
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Status: eternal student
Joined: 06 Mar 2018
Posts: 294
Location: Kazakhstan
GPA: 3.87
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jan 2019, 06:43
GMATNinja wrote:

Well, there are two things that are different in (D) than in (C). One is that the word “comparably” is used in (C), but “to a comparable extent” appears in its place in (D). Honestly, I don’t know if this is a big deal. “Comparably” seems more succinct to me, but I’m not sure that “to a comparable extent” is necessarily WRONG. I certainly wouldn’t eliminate (D) based on that alone, even though I mildly prefer the shorter version in (C).

The other weird issue is the use of “yet” at the beginning of the underlined portion. So that gives us “Despite the increasing number of women…, yet the proportion of women judges…” That’s wrong: both “yet” and “despite” begin dependent clauses, so now the sentence just consists of two dependent clauses in a row. That’s not OK.

So (D) is out.



Good day Sir Charles GMATNinja

I'm a little confused with "despite" and "yet"
As far as I know "comma + FANBOYS" starts new IC, why "yet" in (D) is DC?
I considered that "Despite" is firts dependent clause, then "comma+yet"-IC so structure of the sentence is fine...
To me (D) was more appetitive that (C) with "who" modifier... :roll:

Without "yet" (D) will be correct from meaning and grammar standpoint?
Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent

Could you please enlighten my doubts?
_________________
My SC approach flowchart

(no one is ideal, please correct if you see any mistakes or gaps in my explanation, it will be helpful for both of us, thank you)

___________________
"Nothing in this life is to be feared, it is only to be understood"
~ Marie Curie
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Posts: 20
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Jan 2019, 14:27
How do you know that proportion is the subject and not women?
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Posts: 20
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2019, 12:58
daagh wrote:
Andi







andi

Where do you have a choice among the five, having women as the subject? Our job is to find the correct choice among the given five unless we are u trying to create our own topics? I am afraid this approach is simply out of scope.

Now that this is an official question, are we going to say that we cannot answer this question, as there are no correct answers?



Thank you for the response Daagh.

But Women is part of the underline and it's included in all of the possible answer choices:

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.


And if you ask yourself "who/what have not risen to a comparable extent" wouldn't the logical answer be the women?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5274
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jan 2019, 21:45
Top Contributor
Andi
You may see that this is a clause starting with a modifier and followed by the subject of the main sentence, namely, the proportion. If women were the subject, then the clause should have started with the word "women". Just because 'women' is found somewhere in the underlined part, it won't be eligible to become the subject. There are so many other words also in the underlined part. Can they all contend to be the subjects? What is being compared is the previous proportion with the current proportion.

This is a fundamental tenet in sentence construction. However, let's keep it aside for a while and focus on this question. You are still not telling us as to which is your preferred choice as per your thinking.

If you feel you are correct, please feel free to cling to your views notwithstanding that others may not agree
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't pole-vault above 630, spare 30 hours and you can fly on top.
"Winners never quit and quitters never win". (+919884544509), <newnaren@gmail.com>
Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 954
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2019, 00:58
by default, -this means when there is a split between plural and singular,- collective nouns is singular. a group of, a proportion of+ countable noun is this pattern.

but this dose not mean collective nouns cannot take plural. in OA of some problems on gmat, plural verb can go with collective nouns.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Posts: 9
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Oct 2019, 22:16
How would "who" be justified after the word firms? is who not referring to women? and how is option E been eliminated ? Please explain. Thank you
SVP
SVP
User avatar
D
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1632
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2019, 01:14
1
rachnak82 wrote:
How would "who" be justified after the word firms? is who not referring to women? and how is option E been eliminated ? Please explain. Thank you

Hi Rachna, you are right. who cannot modify firms, since who can only modify persons. So, who is not modifying firms, but judges and partners.

Easiest way to eliminate E is on the basis of redundancy: since we already have despite, we don't need yet.
_________________
Thanks,
Ashish
GMAT-99th Percentile, MBA - ISB Hyderabad
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Contact us for Classroom sessions in Bangalore and Private Tutoring worldwide
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 13 Apr 2019
Posts: 179
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
WE: General Management (Retail)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2019, 02:41
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent

This one is a gift from the GMAT gods: “… the proportion of (blah blah)… HAVE not risen…”

Nope, that’s a classic subject-verb error. We can get rid of (A). Thank you for giving us something easy for once, GMAT!

Quote:
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably

(B) has exactly the same subject-verb error as (A): “… the proportion… HAVE not risen…” So (B) is gone, too.

Isn’t this exciting?

Quote:
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

Well, this works just fine: “the proportion… has not risen comparably.” Let’s keep (C).

Quote:
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent

Well, there are two things that are different in (D) than in (C). One is that the word “comparably” is used in (C), but “to a comparable extent” appears in its place in (D). Honestly, I don’t know if this is a big deal. “Comparably” seems more succinct to me, but I’m not sure that “to a comparable extent” is necessarily WRONG. I certainly wouldn’t eliminate (D) based on that alone, even though I mildly prefer the shorter version in (C).

The other weird issue is the use of “yet” at the beginning of the underlined portion. So that gives us “Despite the increasing number of women…, yet the proportion of women judges…” That’s wrong: both “yet” and “despite” begin dependent clauses, so now the sentence just consists of two dependent clauses in a row. That’s not OK.

So (D) is out.

Quote:
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

And (E) has exactly the same problem as (D): two consecutive dependent clauses does NOT give us a legitimate sentence.

So we can eliminate (E), and (C) is our answer.


Isn't C ambiguous in that it looks as if who are women modifies law firms.
Best could have been "at law firms. the proportion of blah blah who are women blah blah". Please guide.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
D
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1632
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2019, 23:20
azhrhasan wrote:
Isn't C ambiguous in that it looks as if who are women modifies law firms.

who cannot modify law firms, because who can only modify persons.
_________________
Thanks,
Ashish
GMAT-99th Percentile, MBA - ISB Hyderabad
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Contact us for Classroom sessions in Bangalore and Private Tutoring worldwide
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and   [#permalink] 12 Oct 2019, 23:20

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 36 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne