It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 15:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Despite the recent election of a woman to the office of

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1685

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Despite the recent election of a woman to the office of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 10:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Despite the recent election of a woman to the office of prime minister, the status of women in Pakistan is little changed from how it was in the last century.

(A) is little changed from how it was
(B) is a little change from how it was
(C) has changed little
(D) has changed little from how it has been
(E) is little changed from the way it was

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 14 Dec 2004
Posts: 1685

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 13:01
Bhai wrote:
C looks good. All others look redundant to me.

"redundant", exactly

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Bhai was right but for the wrong reasons [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Dec 2005, 23:03
The question is quoted from "Cracking the GMAT" Princeton Review 2004 Edition, pg. 447. Their explanation is the following: the "it" pronoun in A, B, D, E makes it unclear whether it is the status of women in the last century or something else in the last century that we compare the current women status with.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Bhai was right but for the wrong reasons   [#permalink] 27 Dec 2005, 23:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by