GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 09 Dec 2019, 06:43

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Posts: 180
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2015, 07:55
RohitKalla wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.


A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution


The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

:| :?: :roll:



daagh

could you please provide your comments for option C and E.
on what basis we will choose c over E. I was between this two option.
Thanks.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 206
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 May 2017, 11:43
GMATNinja,
GMATNinjaTwo
daagh

Please help on C vs E.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2849
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2017, 20:42
1
techiesam wrote:
GMATNinja,
GMATNinjaTwo
daagh

Please help on C vs E.


Flawed question.

Contribute to + noun is correct. The preposition "to" after contribute is not the same "to" you see in an infinite - it is a preposition that requires a noun as the object of preposition. - Contribute to + verb is wrong. The mistake is similar to the following that we often use at the end of a letter:

Looking forward to see you... wrong. ("looking forward to" requires a noun.)
Looking forward to seeing you.... correct. (gerund "seeing" is a noun and is hence alright)

Similarly "contribute to" requires a noun - usage of gerund "lowering" instead of verb "lower" is required.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 230
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V36
GPA: 3.56
Reviews Badge
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jun 2017, 02:48
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.


A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution
--> completely a run-on sentence.

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution
--> correct.
_________________
Do not pray for an easy life, pray for the strength to endure a difficult one - Bruce Lee
RC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 24 Aug 2016
Posts: 780
GMAT 1: 540 Q49 V16
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Sep 2018, 19:07
RohitKalla wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.


A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution


The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

:| :?: :roll:



I am definitely not an expert by any means ..... but, this is what I think:

Neither X nor Y .... is a classic idiomatic contraction. But, 'nor' not always warrants for a 'neither' ( But, Neither needs a nor :-)).Now when 'nor' is not accompanied with a neither , a clause follows nor. The verb is repeated after the nor.

Keeping the aforementioned in mind and following the ll-list ..... we can eliminate A,B & D.
Now, C is eliminated as we have used 2 single word markers to represent 3 elements ( in ll-ism)
In E ..... the construction is X is not reducing ...... nor is it contributing ...( lower gas cost ll less pollution) [is not reducing ll is it contributing]
_________________
Please let me know if I am going in wrong direction.
Thanks in appreciation.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jan 2012
Posts: 51
Location: Canada
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 04-30-2012
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
CAT Tests
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Nov 2019, 00:06
For E "or less pollution" - doesn't this sound odd?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five   [#permalink] 26 Nov 2019, 00:06

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne