Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 09:15

# Today:

Memorial Day - GMAT Club Tests are Open without Subscription

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [2] , given: 14

Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 21:37
2
KUDOS
17
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

50% (02:02) correct 50% (01:10) wrong based on 837 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

---Winners do it differently---

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2007
Posts: 74
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 21:55
@sudhir18n can you please eloborate more on 'C' and how 'E' is much better than 'C'

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution..........uses the wrong idiom and does not follow the rule of parallelism
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2005
Posts: 564
Followers: 18

Kudos [?]: 215 [3] , given: 13

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 22:09
3
KUDOS
jn.mohit wrote:
@sudhir18n can you please eloborate more on 'C' and how 'E' is much better than 'C'

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution..........uses the wrong idiom and does not follow the rule of parallelism

Observe both C and E.

C: not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

E:not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

Not reducting THE congestion vs not reducing congestion
subtle difference..

Not reducting THE congestion : This means reducing X to do Y
is it contributing to save gas : this should be in the form of : is it contributing the saving of gas .. to be parallel

E makes those changes- Reducing congestion and contributing to lower gas costs...

hope this helps.
Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 167
WE: Design (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 69

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2011, 23:42
I too agree with E...thanks sudhir18n
_________________

Kaustubh

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 67
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 14

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2011, 05:13
[quote="sudhir18n"][quote="jn.mohit"]

Not reducing THE congestion vs not reducing congestion
subtle difference..

Not reducing THE congestion : This means reducing X to do Y What do you mean by this?

I haven't really got what you explained for the usage of "THE".. A lil more explanation please...
_________________

---Winners do it differently---

Manager
Status: Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 33

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2011, 13:53
Good question and very good explanation by Sudhir!
_________________

If I look absent-minded or insane, I am just living a dream of being successful. If you still wonder why I am like this, you have no idea how success tastes like!

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1669
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 103

Kudos [?]: 993 [0], given: 109

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2011, 17:15
+1 E

I eliminated choice C because "save gas" is not the real meaning of the sentence.

Good question.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2011
Posts: 146
GMAT Date: 10-21-2011
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 15

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2011, 11:57
Quote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution
B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting
C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution
D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution
E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

*note: not necessary that 'nor' be used with 'neither'

Quote:

RohitKalla wrote:

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution.........does not follow the correct idiomatic usage... neither X nor Y.

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting............follow the correct idiomatic usage neither X nor Y, and uses an incorrect tense 'polluting'- thus is incorrect

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution..........uses the wrong idiom and does not follow the rule of parallelism

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution............wrong on the use of tense 'it is less pollution'

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution...........unconventional but the most clear and concise option

_________________

"The best day of your life is the one on which you decide your life is your own. No apologies or excuses. No one to lean on, rely on, or blame. The gift is yours - it is an amazing journey - and you alone are responsible for the quality of it. This is the day your life really begins." - Bob Moawab

Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 201
Location: Singapore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 12

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Sep 2011, 00:10
RohitKalla wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

It's tough question.
I also chose C. But Sudhir's explanation is impressive.
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Manager
Joined: 13 Jul 2011
Posts: 144
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 42

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Oct 2011, 06:29
Toughie, i selected C
Director
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 691
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 176 [0], given: 37

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Oct 2011, 05:59
+1 for E.

Elimination of other choices is the way to go in this problem, rather than picking the correct choice.

Crick
Manager
Joined: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 135
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 12

Re: One of the Kind of SC that cause congestion in my brain [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Oct 2011, 04:38
RohitKalla wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

+1 for E. E uses correlative conjunctions most idiomatically.
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Posts: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 15

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2012, 23:29
RohitKalla wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

The question is, whats the guiding rule in such constructions and why the answer is what it is.

+1 for E.
Here is the explanation:

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution--> wrong,it is neither ... nor.

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less pollution--> it doesnot makes sense with the clause after the second comma.

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution-->The use of and makes it wrong.

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution-->for the argument to be true, idiomatically neither should be accompanied by nor.hence this one is wrong.

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution--> this one is correct.

Consider giving me kudos, if u like my post!!
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 454
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 58

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2012, 00:52
"E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution--> this one is correct. "

But what you suggest is: neither A nor B or C.

Shouldn't it be: neither A nor B nor C??
Intern
Joined: 02 Aug 2012
Posts: 25
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2012, 12:36
E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution

I see that this choice violates parallelism. it should've been "nor contributing" if it is to be parallel to "not reducing"
VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1381
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 178

Kudos [?]: 1466 [0], given: 62

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 00:35
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to {lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution}

In C, the use of "and" changes the meaning.
But regardless of this error, one thing that I noticed is that in E, we are talking about "gas costs", whereas in the original choie we are talking about its "amount".
Hasn't the answer choice E deviated from the sense?
_________________
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 641
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 49

Kudos [?]: 589 [0], given: 23

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 00:55
Marcab wrote:
Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five mile per hour speed limit is reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution from the decreased amount of time trucks spend on the road.

A) reducing neither congestion on rural highways, or it is not contributing to save gas for trucking companies and less pollution

B) reducing neither the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to lower gas costs for trucking companies, or to less polluting

C) not reducing the congestion on rural highways nor is it contributing to save gas for trucking companies, and it is not lessening the pollution

D) not reducing the congestion on rural highways, it is not contributing to savings on gas for trucking companies, it is less pollution

E) not reducing congestion on rural highways, nor is it contributing to {lower gas costs for truck companies or less pollution}

In C, the use of "and" changes the meaning.
But regardless of this error, one thing that I noticed is that in E, we are talking about "gas costs", whereas in the original choie we are talking about its "amount".
Hasn't the answer choice E deviated from the sense?

Not really.
The meaning of the sentence is : The hope was to get following benefits by imposing speed limit : 1. reduced congestion 2. lowered gas consumption 3. reduced pollution. But none of these has happened.
Actually apart from meaning, only E retains the grammatical structure. Notice C has three elements connected with not, nor, and. While in E there are 2 elements connected with not-nor and second elements itself has 2 elements connected with or. Perfectly done.

Therefore Ans E it is.
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1381
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Followers: 178

Kudos [?]: 1466 [0], given: 62

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 01:12
I don't have any problem with the grammatical construction of E. The only think that is bothering me here is the use of "gas costs". We were originally concerned with the saving of gas.
_________________
Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 641
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 49

Kudos [?]: 589 [0], given: 23

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jan 2013, 01:19
Marcab wrote:
I don't have any problem with the grammatical construction of E. The only think that is bothering me here is the use of "gas costs". We were originally concerned with the saving of gas.

Logically both mean same things isnt it? If you are saving gas your are saving gas cost. Not everyone is environmentalist but still wants a car with better mileage?
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 82
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 186

Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2013, 12:04
Please elaborate on how "E" is the solution for the above problem???I am unable to understand !!
Re: Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five   [#permalink] 31 Mar 2013, 12:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 The physicist Richard Feynman presented a comprehensive introduction 5 15 Jun 2015, 23:31
105 Sixty-five million years ago, according to some scientists, 41 06 May 2017, 04:32
In 1997, despite an economy... 3 27 Jan 2017, 04:25
8 Despite there being no fundamental difference in 10 01 Jun 2015, 07:56
2 One pervasive theory explains the introduction of breakfast 14 31 Jan 2017, 00:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Despite what was hoped, the introduction of a sixty-five

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.