Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack
GMAT Club

 It is currently 24 Mar 2017, 15:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 221
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 11

DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 08:31
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (03:04) correct 29% (02:02) wrong based on 116 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

“DNA fingerprinting” is a recently-introduced biochemical procedure that uses a pattern derived from a person’s genetic material to match a suspect’s genetic material against that of a specimen from a crime scene. Proponents have claimed astronomically high odds against obtaining a match by chance alone. These odds are based on an assumption that there is independence between the different characteristics represented by a single pattern.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the claim of the proponents of DNA fingerprinting?
(A) The large amount of genetic material that people share with all other people and with other animals is not included in the DNA fingerprinting procedure.
(B) There is generally accepted theoretical basis for interpreting the patterns produced by the procedure.
(C) In the whole population there are various different subgroups, within each of which certain sets of genetic characteristics are shared.
(D) The skill required of laboratory technicians performing the DNA fingerprinting procedure is not extraordinary.
(E) In the investigation of certain genetic diseases, the techniques used in DNA fingerprinting have traced the transmission of the diseases among the living members of very large families.

I arrived at the answer purely by POE, could anybody please explain to me the argument and the logic. Thanks.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 174
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 87 [1] , given: 25

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 10:14
1
KUDOS
We need to find a fact which weakens the claim that DNA fingerprinting is foolproof. It is also mentioned that 'These odds are based on an assumption that there is independence between the different characteristics represented by a single pattern.'

(C) In the whole population there are various different subgroups, within each of which certain sets of genetic
characteristics are shared.
This information clearly weaken the claim. As different subgroups may share the same genetic characteristics, the assumption on which the claim is based is proved wrong.
_________________

Give [highlight]KUDOS [/highlight] if you like my post.

Always do things which make you feel ALIVE!!!

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 113
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2013
GMAT 1: 670 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V41
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 260 [0], given: 43

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 10:41
First POE is not too bad. IMO you should look at all answers to see that there is no "better" answer, so you can POE while you do that. A better answer is an answer that attack directly the conclusion (in weaken question like this) and adds less "out of scope" data as possible.
When I looked at this question I immediately canceled A,B & D as IMO they are too far from the data given in the question or simply irrelevant.
When I looked at E it seemed to attack less directly the "independence between the different characteristics represented by a single pattern" than C did. so I was left with C.
Hope that helps..
_________________

Consider Kudos if my post helped you. Thanks!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My TOEFL Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-toefl-experience-99884.html
My GMAT Debrief: http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-730-10-luck-20-skill-15-concentrated-power-of-will-104473.html

Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 408
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 50

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 19:50
Out of the 5 choices only A and E are relevant to the premises provided in the stimulus.

Option A strengthens or supports the proponents by discounting the common genetic material shared.

Option C is exactly the opposite of option A and it weakens the argument presented in the stimulus.

And I agree, POE is the best technique here.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 15

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 20:01
I thought in A, the answer means that some parts of the DNA is not tested, and therefore it's most likely to cause mistakes.
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 408
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 50

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2010, 20:03
FQ wrote:
I thought in A, the answer means that some parts of the DNA is not tested, and therefore it's most likely to cause mistakes.

Option A talks of some parts which is shared across diverse groups and hence including it in the DNA analysis will skew the result. Hence option A should be ruled out.

The idea is to cut out the common portion and retain the uniqueness of the DNA fingerprint to uniquely identify the individual.

Side note: I have heard that comparing at least 6 different areas of the DNA strands or sequences, the chances of these 6 areas matching for any two individual is simply out of the question since the chances are less than 1 in 6 billion.

Completely irrelevant to the current context but nevertheless interesting bits of information.

_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Senior Manager
Status: Upset about the verbal score - SC, CR and RC are going to be my friend
Joined: 30 Jun 2010
Posts: 318
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 6

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Sep 2010, 20:01
C

_________________

My gmat story
MGMAT1 - 630 Q44V32
MGMAT2 - 650 Q41V38
MGMAT3 - 680 Q44V37
GMATPrep1 - 660 Q49V31
Knewton1 - 550 Q40V27

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 331
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2010, 09:12
Used POE to eliminate B, D & E since they are irrelevant

Assumption is based on the fact that there is independence between the different characteristics represented by a single pattern. Therefore, anything that suggests that there is no independence between the different characteristics will weaken this assumption. Between A & C, A talks about the material that is shared and is not included in the fingerprinting procedure. Not much help. However, C talks about the fact that different subgroups share certain genetic characteristics.
_________________

All things are possible to those who believe.

Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 175
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 15

Re: DNA fingerprinting, help explain the idea and logic [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Oct 2010, 20:32
C for me. Another 2 min+ question for me. I had to read the options couple of times.
_________________

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10668
Followers: 957

Kudos [?]: 213 [0], given: 0

Re: DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Feb 2015, 22:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
SVP
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2377
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Followers: 26

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 147

Re: DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Mar 2016, 19:21
gautrang wrote:
“DNA fingerprinting” is a recently-introduced biochemical procedure that uses a pattern derived from a person’s genetic material to match a suspect’s genetic material against that of a specimen from a crime scene. Proponents have claimed astronomically high odds against obtaining a match by chance alone. These odds are based on an assumption that there is independence between the different characteristics represented by a single pattern.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the claim of the proponents of DNA fingerprinting?
(A) The large amount of genetic material that people share with all other people and with other animals is not included in the DNA fingerprinting procedure.
(B) There is generally accepted theoretical basis for interpreting the patterns produced by the procedure.
(C) In the whole population there are various different subgroups, within each of which certain sets of genetic characteristics are shared.
(D) The skill required of laboratory technicians performing the DNA fingerprinting procedure is not extraordinary.
(E) In the investigation of certain genetic diseases, the techniques used in DNA fingerprinting have traced the transmission of the diseases among the living members of very large families.

I arrived at the answer purely by POE, could anybody please explain to me the argument and the logic. Thanks.

we need to get an answer choice that would support usage of dna fingerprinting.
the proponents say it will be difficult..we need to say it will be not..
A - that makes the usage difficult so out
B - completely irrelevant
C - ok, so the patterns CAN be classified..we can use the technique to ID the suspect..because it will belong to a specific subgroup.
D - what techniques dna fingerprinting uses and how difficult these are are irrelevant.
E - good one...but one large family "shares" the same genetic code..we need an answer choice that would say that different genetic codes can be classified into subgroups/identified. so e is out and C stands
Re: DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical   [#permalink] 21 Mar 2016, 19:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 The ability to analyze genomes — sequences of DNA 6 18 Nov 2013, 21:06
3 DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical 4 10 Sep 2012, 12:44
15 Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 23 12 Aug 2010, 10:18
5 Biometric access-control systems those using fingerprints, 10 09 Aug 2008, 00:13
DNA fingerprinting is a recently-introduced biochemical 4 30 Nov 2007, 12:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by