It is currently 27 Jun 2017, 09:22

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a

Author Message
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1209
Location: Taiwan
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 06:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a ring of stones thousands of years ago in Britain were knowledgeable about celestial
events. The ground for this claim is that two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring
equinox. There are many stones in the ring, however, so the chance that one pair will point in a celestially significant direction is large.

Therefore, the people who built the ring were not knowledgeable about celestial events.

Which one of the following is an error of reasoning in Dobsonâ€™s argument?

(A) The failure of cited evidence to establish a statement is taken as evidence that that statement is false.

(B) Dobsonâ€™s conclusion logically contradicts some of the evidence presented in support of it.

(C) Statements that absolutely establish Dobsonâ€™s conclusion are treated as if they merely give some support to that conclusion.

(D) Something that is merely a matter of opinion is treated as if it were subject to verification as a matter of fact.

(E) Dobsonâ€™s drawing the conclusion relies on interpreting a key term in two different ways.

Hi, I know this has been posted before. But I need your explicit explanation, thanks.
Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 894

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2005, 16:53
go with (A).

Evidence: two of the stones determine a line pointing directly to the position of the sun at sunrise at the spring
equinox.

Since the evidence fails to establish the conclusion, Dobson concluded that this whole statement is crap.
22 Apr 2005, 16:53
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious 0 04 Jul 2013, 20:17
Reviewer: Many historians claim, in their own treatment of 5 14 Mar 2011, 17:43
People who discontinue regular exercise typically claim that 9 25 Jan 2011, 08:25
Dobson: Some historians claim that the people who built a 5 13 Mar 2010, 13:20
Some philosophers of science claim that no serious 0 27 Jun 2008, 13:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by