Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 19:55 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 19:55

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 109
Own Kudos [?]: 548 [26]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2010
Status:Upset about the verbal score - SC, CR and RC are going to be my friend
Posts: 263
Own Kudos [?]: 30 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Status:<strong>Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.</strong>
Posts: 2279
Own Kudos [?]: 3593 [0]
Given Kudos: 235
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 175
Own Kudos [?]: 459 [2]
Given Kudos: 13
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Send PM
Re: Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my country’s private healt [#permalink]
2
Bookmarks
(A) People’s rights are violated less when they are denied an available medical treatment they need because they lack the means to pay for it than when they are denied such treatment on noneconomic grounds. Dr Schilling is saying that limited access to high tech medicine to people who can afford to pay is wrong. The limits to access for this segment is not because of lack of resources 9economic grounds) but because of ‘non-availability /restriction on access due to availability etc.’ – non economic grounds. And Schilling argues this is wrong- in accordance with what is stated in statement A- if enied on non-economic means- it is more of a violation.
Laforte says that people should never be denied access to a treatment because they are poor and cant afford it. Clearly this is against what is stated in statement A – that denying on economic grouns is less of a violation.
Clearly both doctors differ in their views on Statement A - one agrees while the other is against it, hence correct option.

(B) Where health insurance is provided by private insurance companies, people who are wealthy generally receive better health care than do people who are unable to afford health insurance. Both Schilling and Laforte know this is true – they differ not in agreeing to the truth of this statement, they differ in their attitude towards whether this is right or not.

(C) In countries that rely primarily on private health insurance to pay for medical costs, most people who would benefit from a kidney transplant receive one.No, both doctors are disagreeing to this. Laforte says that in pvt insurance, poor people who need a kidney treatment will not receive it because they cant afford to pay, while Schilling is saying that because of access being limited to high tech medicine including kidney transplant – there would be people who would not get it, whether rich or poor – no difference in views towards this statement – hence incorrect.

(D) In countries with nationalized health insurance, no one who needs a familiar medical treatment in order to stay alive is denied that treatment. Both the doctors agree that nationalized insurance wull provide access to basic, conventional medicine – not differing in their views on this. Hence incorrect option.
(E) Anyone who wants a particular medical treatment has a right to receive that treatment.Both the arguments are through different reasons disagreeing to this. By Dr Schilling’s argument poorer people would end up not having means to pay for the medical treatment and would end up getting denied the treatment, while by Lafote’s argument some people, whether poor or rich will get denoed the treatment under nationalized insurance because of access being restricted due to availability. Hence both disagree- and don’t differ in their attitude towards statement E
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Status:Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Posts: 472
Own Kudos [?]: 892 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Send PM
Re: Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my country’s private healt [#permalink]
E. Hence both disagree- and don’t differ in their attitude towards statement E

(E) Anyone who wants a particular medical treatment has a right to receive that treatment.
I think Dr. Schilling agrees but Dr. Laforte has no stance

Dr. Laforte: Your country’s reliance on private health insurance denies access even to basic, conventional medicine to the many people who cannot afford adequate health coverage. With nationalized insurance, rich and poor have equal access to life-saving medical procedures. And people’s right to decent medical treatment regardless of income is not violated. ---> he certanily did not qualify the rights of the people with this example.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92883
Own Kudos [?]: 618612 [2]
Given Kudos: 81563
Send PM
Re: Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my country’s private healt [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
gautrang wrote:
Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my country’s private health insurance system with nationalized health insurance because of the rising costs of medical care fail to consider the high human costs that consumers pay in countries with nationalized insurance: access to high-technology medicine is restricted. Kidney transplants and open-heart surgery—familiar life-saving procedures—are rationed. People are denied their right to treatments they want and need.

Dr. Laforte: Your country’s reliance on private health insurance denies access even to basic, conventional medicine to the many people who cannot afford adequate health coverage. With nationalized insurance, rich and poor have equal access to life-saving medical procedures. And people’s right to decent medical treatment regardless of income is not violated.

Dr. Schilling’s and Dr. Laforte’s statements provide the most support for holding that they would disagree about the truth of which one of the following?


(A) People’s rights are violated less when they are denied an available medical treatment they need because they lack the means to pay for it than when they are denied such treatment on noneconomic grounds.

(B) Where health insurance is provided by private insurance companies, people who are wealthy generally receive better health care than do people who are unable to afford health insurance.

(C) In countries that rely primarily on private health insurance to pay for medical costs, most people who would benefit from a kidney transplant receive one.

(D) In countries with nationalized health insurance, no one who needs a familiar medical treatment in order to stay alive is denied that treatment.

(E) Anyone who wants a particular medical treatment has a right to receive that treatment.


Check out TWIN QUESTION here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/dr-schilling ... 14751.html
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my countrys private healt [#permalink]
B, C, and D are statements on which DR. Laforte's stance or opinion cannot be inferred from the statement he has given, he is just talking about a major drawback of schilling's countries system that overpowers the benefits stated by schilling.
E) is a Good trap however it is not discussed in the exchange and thus cannot be inferred with certainty.

A) happens to be the conclusion or gist of the exchange and thus can be inferred - schilling > noneconomic grounds and Laforte> economic or lack of means to pay grounds.

Pretty simple question if you get the argument.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Dr. Schilling: Those who advocate replacing my countrys private healt [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne