It is currently 20 Jan 2018, 22:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2010, 09:43
As a couple of others pointed out above we have to accept the passage as absolutely true. This is a Family 1 question based on Powerscore CR nomenclature. So the answer choice cannot conflict with the passage. The passage clearly mentions the finances are not affected and are ok. I can't see how C is the answer. I picked a by poe. E is not impacted as they are status quo; b and d are more inconvenienced rather than "damaged"

Posted from my mobile device

Last edited by gmat1011 on 30 Dec 2010, 09:59, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2010
Posts: 222

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Dec 2010, 09:53
Actually it does say finances not affected "on the whole" - so parts can be affected. I guess the question expects one to separate out the budget from the finances with an impact on the budget not necessarily affecting the finances "on the whole". C doesn't conflict if that is the case.

Posted from my mobile device

Kudos [?]: 109 [0], given: 20

Manager
Joined: 09 Jun 2011
Posts: 105

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 04:57
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

(A) A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.

(B) Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours.

(C) The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.

(D) Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.

(E) Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

Last edited by hazelnut on 06 Oct 2017, 23:51, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2011
Posts: 428

Kudos [?]: 231 [0], given: 20

Location: Texas
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2011, 09:19
bholakc wrote:
• A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.
• Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours.
• The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.
• Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.
• Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

it is C - even if the city doesnt add more buses, more drivers etc.. with existing buses and drivers there will not be any income from the sector.

A - argument doesnt talk about it.
B - we dont know the council might add more drivers.
D - well the bus service could be changed... we cannot base the argument on D.. it could be otherwise since it is not explicitly mentioned.
E - we dont know what percentage of total are the commuters who do not live near public routes.

Kudos [?]: 231 [0], given: 20

Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 28

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2011, 08:15
is it A?
Why cant we bring in new info from the options?
C seems like restatement of facts.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 9

Intern
Status: Application submitted
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 38

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Location: NYC
Schools: Stern
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2011, 15:29
bholakc wrote:
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

• A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.
• Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours.
• The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.
• Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.
• Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Location: Houston TX
Schools: Boston College , U of Miami
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2011, 17:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
I chose A at first, but searched on here and it seems to be OA is (C) .

I think what I got hung up on was

...and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices

So, the general idea is the city wants people to spend money in the city so the city can collect the \$. People cant do this if they are spending all their money on gas.

I glanced over C and said to myself, '' true, the budget wont balance coming from the transit end, but considering that the 'above' statements were true i thought people would spend the difference in the city economy and the city would recoup \$ via economic growth in businesses, etc. ''
once again i over-analyze CR and pay the price.

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2011, 22:17
OA is C, since city council’s plan is to save ppl money and increase city finance. By not increasing ticket fare they will save ppl money but city finance will be hindered.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Manager
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 106

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 40

Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2011, 22:44
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

The argument is "city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices."

In above argument ..tricky part is 'on the whole'

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

• A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.- Incorrect nothing to do with the argument.
• Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours. - incorrect- same as A
• The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months. - Correct -Due to this plan some citizen might be able to save trasport cost. however , as a whole city's finace i.e. economy will be impacted becauseof loss of revenue from transport• Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays. - incorrect ..well travel delays and crowded condition will no have impact on city's finance.
• Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 40

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2010
Posts: 103

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2011, 16:39
bholakc wrote:
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

• A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.
• Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours.
• The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.
• Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.
• Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

C. If there is no revenue for three months, the city council's buget may be damaged.

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 172

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 6

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2011, 01:23

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 6

Manager
Status: SC SC SC SC SC.... Concentrating on SC alone.
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 233

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT Date: 12-30-2011
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 06:11
Chose D initially. But i do agree with explanations. So C.
_________________

D- Day December 30 2011. Hoping for the happiest new year celebrations !

Aiming for 700+

Kudo me if the post is worth it

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 23:37
At the first glance, I will choose A. But when read C twice. I chose C because it directly weaken the conclusion of argument which stated that "Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices."
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 44

Manager
Status: SC SC SC SC SC.... Concentrating on SC alone.
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 233

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT Date: 12-30-2011
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 23:43
Yea you are right. We must have noticed the word city finances and its impact.
_________________

D- Day December 30 2011. Hoping for the happiest new year celebrations !

Aiming for 700+

Kudo me if the post is worth it

Kudos [?]: 63 [0], given: 47

Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 166

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2011, 21:14
+1 C
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 166

Senior Manager
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 52

Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Nov 2011, 14:09
+1 for C
_________________

Sky is the limit

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 52

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 1318 [0], given: 18

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Dec 2011, 18:38
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

a) A local chain of service stations, which will see fewer customers during the daily commute.

b) Members of the bus drivers’ union, who will be forced to add more routes and work longer hours.

c) The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.

d) Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.

e) Commuters who do not live near public transportation routes and will not be able to take advantage of the suspended fares.

Why not d?
I thought more people who used to drive to work use public transportation because of free fare of public transportation, so commuters who already use public transportation will be dameged by crowded condition.

Also, I thought that goverment will receive more tax from increased spending, and the increased tax revenue will supplement the unbalaced budget.

Did I think too much? ;;;;

Kudos [?]: 1318 [0], given: 18

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 889

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2011, 06:30
eybrj2 wrote:
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

If all of the statements above are true, which of the following is most likely to be damaged by the city council’s plan?

c) The city council’s budget, which will be unbalanced after receiving no revenue from transit fares for three months.

d) Commuters who already use public transportation daily and who will face crowded conditions and travel delays.

Why not d?
I thought more people who used to drive to work use public transportation because of free fare of public transportation, so commuters who already use public transportation will be dameged by crowded condition.

Also, I thought that goverment will receive more tax from increased spending, and the increased tax revenue will supplement the unbalaced budget.

Did I think too much? ;;;;

D is really out of scope because the argument here is focus on status in finance of citizens and the city. Whether public transportation is crowed or not does not affect to the standard of living.

In choice C, you think that the city increase tax, but this increase does not mention in argument. If you think that the citizen will have more savings to spend on other sectors, this does not mean that the tax revenue of the city will increase because the citizens still have the same amount of money REMAINS (approximately) after or before suspending transporation fare. Moreover, the city only stop fare of transportation to the commuter, it will lack of money. So, this event will affect adversely the city's finance
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 759 [0], given: 44

Manager
Joined: 23 Jul 2011
Posts: 187

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 66

Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: UCSD (D)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34
GPA: 2.99
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to w [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Dec 2011, 21:41
"D" is what the Powerscore CR Bible would call the Shell Game Answer. A Shell Game Answer addresses a conclusion that is very similar, but is wrong. In this case it is very attractive. The Shell Game answer addresses issues about Public Transport Riders. This is the wrong conclusion. The write Conslusion we want to weaken in this context is "In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months." Answer C directly weakens this conclusion by stating that the cities budget will take a direct hit from the plan. It can be assumed that a city budget that falls short will have negative effects on the economy. Hope that helps some!!

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 66

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Dec 2011, 04:24
Tricky question. Got this one wrong. C should be the correct answer.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who   [#permalink] 24 Dec 2011, 04:24

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 73 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.