It is currently 22 Sep 2017, 15:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# During each of the past five years, the total demand for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 462

Kudos [?]: 170 [1], given: 24

Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 12:21
1
KUDOS
9
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:58) correct 45% (01:57) wrong based on 759 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging.
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased.
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.

OE:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
The correct answer is (A). According to the passage, the total paper demand for packaging has been decreasing, while the amount of paper packaging recycled for the same purpose has been increasing. These two facts, considered together, lend strong support to the conclusion that manufacturers have been substituting recycled paper packaging for “fresh” paper to meet their demand for paper packaging.

OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Kudos [?]: 170 [1], given: 24

Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 406

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 50

Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB

### Show Tags

09 Oct 2010, 14:16
1
KUDOS
Narrowed the choices to two -- A and B. Could not make out what option B was about, it was very confusing and probably some new information added as a trap.

Option A wins.

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging. -- [Cannot be determined.]
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased. [Cannot be determined since non-paper based materials was not discussed at all.]
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using. [New information not present in the stimulus.]
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Kudos [?]: 238 [1], given: 50

Manager
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Posts: 118

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 172

### Show Tags

24 Jan 2011, 16:08
tough one, i think above 700 level
_________________

I will greatly appreciate your KUDOS my friends!

Kudos [?]: 276 [0], given: 172

Manager
Joined: 12 Sep 2010
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 27

Concentration: Healthcare, General Management

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2011, 02:13
My biggest problem for a Must Be True question is trying to understand and remember all the facts from the stimulus. Usually, I have to read the stimulus twice. Then I would read each answer choice and then refer back to the stimulus again to try to prove/disprove it. Can someone suggest how I can do these problems more efficiently? Thanks.

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 27

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 900

Kudos [?]: 858 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jan 2013, 23:20
During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.(Already stated in RED)
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.(Sounds awkward)
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging.
Given the argument I think this one is correct.,the argument implies this only as option A is already stated in the argument so cannot be a conclusion.
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased.
OOS
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.
OOS

This needs a discussion folks.
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 858 [0], given: 322

Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 462

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 24

Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2013, 00:03
targetgmatchotu wrote:
During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.(Already stated in RED)
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.(Sounds awkward)
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging.
Given the argument I think this one is correct.,the argument implies this only as option A is already stated in the argument so cannot be a conclusion.
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased.
OOS
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.
OOS

This needs a discussion folks.

Hey targetgmatchotu,

If you take a look at the option that you chose, i.e. Option C the biggest problem you will see in the phrase 'only for new packaging' Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging. They don't mention anywhere that all the recycled paper based packaging goes into making new paper-based packagin. They just say that the demand has increased. So in future just be a bit wary of strong words like "only" in the answer.

Only answer A fits since that data is available in the question allowing you to reasonably draw a conclusion that amount of paper-based packing using fresh timber is decreasing since it is stated in the question that " the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined".

I hope this helps.
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 24

Current Student
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1988

Kudos [?]: 707 [0], given: 355

Concentration: Finance
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Oct 2013, 17:14
kidchaos wrote:
During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging.
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased.
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.

OE:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
The correct answer is (A). According to the passage, the total paper demand for packaging has been decreasing, while the amount of paper packaging recycled for the same purpose has been increasing. These two facts, considered together, lend strong support to the conclusion that manufacturers have been substituting recycled paper packaging for “fresh” paper to meet their demand for paper packaging.

OA:

Well they have been substituting fresh paper for recycled for starters, but what if the company had stocks/inventory on paper from freshly cut tress? We cannot assume that since there is less timber therefore less in being used in the product of paper right? Or can we?

I think this would be nice to discuss, lets share some knowledge
J

Bumpingg

Kudos [?]: 707 [0], given: 355

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10171

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2015, 01:00
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 253 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 15 May 2015
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2015, 05:37
Hi everyone,

I think that the correct answer is option A.

The decline in the demand for the fresh paper is more or less compensated by the recycling of the paper(stated in the argument)
Therefore it can be concluded that the amount of freshly cut timber,which is the source of the paper,is apparently decreasing.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

Intern
Joined: 20 Jan 2015
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V24
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V37
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2015, 06:31
Why is option E incorrect?

Option E says that consumers have increased the usage of paper products that they recycle .. implies .. more amount of recycled paper. Does this not imply that the amount of recycled paper is increasing... so the requirement for fresh paper is decreasing?

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2013
Posts: 345

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 403

GMAT 1: 690 Q45 V39
WE: General Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2015, 06:57
formulaone wrote:
Why is option E incorrect?

Option E says that consumers have increased the usage of paper products that they recycle .. implies .. more amount of recycled paper. Does this not imply that the amount of recycled paper is increasing... so the requirement for fresh paper is decreasing?

Option E-Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.

Read option E again with particular emphasis on the underlined portion.
Where in the argument do are we discussing about recycling by the consumers??

And, infact, if the consumers (= paper packaging industry) themselves start recycling the paper then there will less supply of recyclable paper to the recycling plants and consequently back to the packaging industry.

Even if we leave aside the above explanation, remember that the whole argument is based on amount ( read number) and option E is about portion (= percentage).

On the GMAT, it is rare that an argument that talks about numbers may be answered by percentages.
Numbers go with numbers and percentages go with percentages.

Hope I am right and the above helps!

I do not mind Kudos
_________________

Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time.

I hated every minute of training, but I said, 'Don't quit. Suffer now and live the rest of your life as a champion.-Mohammad Ali

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 403

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 328

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2015, 14:07
samichange wrote:
formulaone wrote:
Why is option E incorrect?

Option E says that consumers have increased the usage of paper products that they recycle .. implies .. more amount of recycled paper. Does this not imply that the amount of recycled paper is increasing... so the requirement for fresh paper is decreasing?

Option E-Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.

Read option E again with particular emphasis on the underlined portion.
Where in the argument do are we discussing about recycling by the consumers??

And, infact, if the consumers (= paper packaging industry) themselves start recycling the paper then there will less supply of recyclable paper to the recycling plants and consequently back to the packaging industry.

Even if we leave aside the above explanation, remember that the whole argument is based on amount ( read number) and option E is about portion (= percentage).

On the GMAT, it is rare that an argument that talks about numbers may be answered by percentages.
Numbers go with numbers and percentages go with percentages.

Hope I am right and the above helps!

I do not mind Kudos

Hi Samichange,

During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.

I have strange doubt regarding OA
As the highlighted text in stimulus states that volume of timber used to produce paper has decreased
This does not implies that amount of paper from freshly cut trees has decresed

This is no where mentioned in stimulus , In fact we can assume maybe there be some technological advancement due to which more paper can be produced from less volume of timber etc

So there is no evidence/real proof that amount of packaging produced from freshly cut trees has decreased

On the contrary there is no such mention of "freshly cut trees" in the stimulus so this is new information and this choice needs to be discarded

So how can we ascertain A is correct

Please let me know If I am missing something

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 328

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2015, 14:10
tvrs09 wrote:
Hi everyone,

I think that the correct answer is option A.

The decline in the demand for the fresh paper is more or less compensated by the recycling of the paper(stated in the argument)
Therefore it can be concluded that the amount of freshly cut timber,which is the source of the paper,is apparently decreasing.

Hi Tvrs09,

During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.

I have strange doubt regarding OA
As the highlighted text in stimulus states that volume of timber used to produce paper has decreased
This does not implies that amount of paper from freshly cut trees has decresed

This is no where mentioned in stimulus , In fact we can assume maybe there be some technological advancement due to which more paper can be produced from less volume of timber etc

So there is no evidence/real proof that amount of packaging produced from freshly cut trees has decreased

On the contrary there is no such mention of "freshly cut trees" in the stimulus so this is new information and this choice needs to be discarded

So how can we ascertain A is correct

Please let me know If I am missing something

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 01 Mar 2015
Posts: 18

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 23

Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2015, 02:10
kidchaos wrote:
During each of the past five years, the total demand for paper on the part of manufacturers who produce paper packaging for consumer products has declined. During the same time period, the cubic volume of freshly cut timber that is used to produce paper packaging has also declined. However, reliable reports from recycling facilities across the country indicate that the amount of paper-based packaging material that they provide to paper-packaging companies for reuse has been increasing steadily.

The information provided best supports which of the following conclusions with respect to the last five years?

(A) The amount of packaging using paper from freshly cut trees has decreased.
(B) The amount of paper-based packaging that has been recycled for the same uses has exceeded the amount that has not.
(C) Recycled paper-based packaging has been used only for new packaging.
(D) The total amount of packaging material made of non-paper materials has increased.
(E) Consumers have increased the portion of paper products that they recycle after using.

OE:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
The correct answer is (A). According to the passage, the total paper demand for packaging has been decreasing, while the amount of paper packaging recycled for the same purpose has been increasing. These two facts, considered together, lend strong support to the conclusion that manufacturers have been substituting recycled paper packaging for “fresh” paper to meet their demand for paper packaging.

OA:

Prephrase:
1. Total Demand(TD) for paper by paper packaging manufacturers(PPM) reduced. [point noted - PPM only for consumer goods]
2. Fresh timber USAGE [the word is not the demand] has been reduced in same period.
3. report from recycling facilities = paper material for reuse to paper packaging companies (PPC) [PPC may be = PPM] has been increased.

Inference = reuse of paper has been increased, fresh timber usage has been decreased.

Choice Analysis:
A - it looks perfect
B - this choice speaks about usage - we have not provided with different usages of paper based packaging.
C - 'Only' is too absolute.
D - paper material vs. non paper material for packaging = no information available, out of the scope
E - Consumers incremental usage? - nothing of this sort stated. Out of the scope!

Hence, A is correct.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 23

Director
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 837

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 776

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2017, 03:36
B,C,D are out of scope.
E is not certain. (remember this is an inference question)
A is correct because both demands and materials decrease => products decrease

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 776

VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1028

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 502

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: 314 Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2017, 06:02
Imo A
Only A can be concluded logically.
D is out of scope
E Nothing is mentioned in the argument about Consumers.
_________________

We are more often frightened than hurt; and we suffer more from imagination than from reality

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 502

Re: During each of the past five years, the total demand for   [#permalink] 30 Jun 2017, 06:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by