It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 03:43

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Each person who attended a company meeting was either a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 84

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 44

Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2012, 03:51
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

85% (01:16) correct 15% (01:37) wrong based on 256 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company or both. If 62 percent of these who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees. What percent were stockholders, who were not employees?

A. 52
B. 53
C. 54
D. 55
E. 56
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

MGMAT CAT MATH http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-cat-math-144609.html
MGMAT SC SUMMARY: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mgmat-sc-summary-144610.html

Kudos [?]: 175 [0], given: 44

VP
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1347

Kudos [?]: 642 [0], given: 20

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2012, 03:58
100 = 62 + 47 - n(SnE) [where n represents intersection]
=> n(SnE) = 9

=> Number who were only stockholders = n(S) - n(SnE) = 53 percent

Option (B)
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Kudos [?]: 642 [0], given: 20

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41892

Kudos [?]: 129078 [1], given: 12194

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Apr 2012, 04:09
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
monir6000 wrote:
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company or both. If 62 percent of these who attended the meeting were stockholders and 47 percent were employees. What percent were stockholders, who were not employees?

A. 52
B. 53
C. 54
D. 55
E. 56

Total = Stockholders + Employees - Both;
100 = 62 + 47 - Both --> Both = 9;

Percent of stockholders, who were not employees is: Stockholders - Both = 62 - 9 =53.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 129078 [1], given: 12194

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16609

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2015, 21:59
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2015, 09:18
I came up with the same answer choice B, but my approach was slightly different!

47% were employees which shall cover those who were only employees and those who were both shareholders and employees.

Thus, the number of attendants who were only shareholders is 100% - 47% = 53%.

Correct me if I'm wrong please!!!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 3

Math Forum Moderator
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 3003

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 325

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2015, 10:32
Charles_River wrote:
I came up with the same answer choice B, but my approach was slightly different!

47% were employees which shall cover those who were only employees and those who were both shareholders and employees.

Thus, the number of attendants who were only shareholders is 100% - 47% = 53%.

Correct me if I'm wrong please!!!

USe venn diagram , matter of 5 secods
Attachments

Untitled.png [ 4.23 KiB | Viewed 4684 times ]

_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 325

Manager
Joined: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 88

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 15

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2016, 05:13
Does anyone know how can we solve this question by using the matrix/table ? I'm having difficulties in drawing one.

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 15

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2015
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jul 2016, 13:02
HarveyKlaus wrote:
Does anyone know how can we solve this question by using the matrix/table ? I'm having difficulties in drawing one.

HarveyKlaus Hope it helps. This is my first post!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 10

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2212

Kudos [?]: 841 [1], given: 595

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 10:42
1
KUDOS
Here we can use some of our high school set theory =>
N(A U B) = 100=> N(A) = 62 ; N(B)=47
N(intersection) => 62+47-100=9
Only A=>62-9=>53
Smash B
_________________

Give me a hell yeah ...!!!!!

Kudos [?]: 841 [1], given: 595

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16609

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2017, 10:37
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 125

Location: India
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2017, 10:17
I too used the Double Matrix Approach to solve this.

The Key thing here is to pay attention to - "Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company or both.".

What this means is there is no one in the Meeting who is neither a Shareholder NOR an employee.

Once this is know the double Matrix can be written quickly. This is already mentioned by one of the users above.
_________________

My Best is yet to come!

Last edited by susheelh on 03 Sep 2017, 21:38, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 125

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 19:07
Abhishek009 wrote:
Charles_River wrote:
I came up with the same answer choice B, but my approach was slightly different!

47% were employees which shall cover those who were only employees and those who were both shareholders and employees.

Thus, the number of attendants who were only shareholders is 100% - 47% = 53%.

Correct me if I'm wrong please!!!

USe venn diagram , matter of 5 secods

Abhishek009

Abhishek - Could you explain how you arrived at this Venn diagram, please?

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 19:36
susheelh wrote:
I too used the Double Matrix Approach to solve this.

The Key thing here is to pay attention to - "Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company or both.".

What this means is there is no one in the Meeting who is neither a Shareholder OR an employee.

Once this is know the double Matrix can be written quickly. This is already mentioned by one of the users above.

OK, still figuring out how I could solve this. I came across a video tut on here to solve questions using double matrix method. In that context, susheel - did you mean NEITHER a stockholder NOR an employee?

GMATPrepNow - Could you help me with the double matrix table as you explained in one of your videos, please?

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 125

Location: India
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 21:34
1
KUDOS
Hello Blackbox!

Yes, thats correct! I will go and edit the typo. Thanks for pointing it out

Here's the double Matrix. Just to make it clearer.

Attachment:

Screen Shot 2017-09-04 at 9.51.17 AM.png [ 20.73 KiB | Viewed 559 times ]

We choose 100 as the smart number since everything is in percentage (Its marked in Orange in the screen shot). The Green colour is what is "Given"in the question. Rest everything is simple addition. Finally we get the required answered (Marked in Yellow).

Blackbox wrote:
susheelh wrote:
I too used the Double Matrix Approach to solve this.

The Key thing here is to pay attention to - "Each person who attended a company meeting was either a stockholder in the company, an employee of the company or both.".

What this means is there is no one in the Meeting who is neither a Shareholder OR an employee.

Once this is know the double Matrix can be written quickly. This is already mentioned by one of the users above.

OK, still figuring out how I could solve this. I came across a video tut on here to solve questions using double matrix method. In that context, susheel - did you mean NEITHER a stockholder NOR an employee?

GMATPrepNow - Could you help me with the double matrix table as you explained in one of your videos, please?

_________________

My Best is yet to come!

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 125

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2017, 18:48
Thank you, susheelh. Job well done at explaining! I intend to follow this approach for overlapping sets ... although, I am yet to encounter a problem where there are more than 2 sets that overlap.

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2016
Posts: 218

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 125

Location: India
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2017, 18:55
I am Glad that it helped!

There are loads of question with more then two sets overlap, I am sure you will find them.

As a general thumb rule (courtesy : MGMAT strategy guides) : for two set overlap use double matrix. For 3 set overlap, use Venn diagrams.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
_________________

My Best is yet to come!

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 125

Manager
Joined: 30 May 2012
Posts: 220

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.3
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2017, 19:22
susheelh wrote:
... As a general thumb rule (courtesy : MGMAT strategy guides) : for two set overlap use double matrix. For 3 set overlap, use Venn diagrams.

I was thinking about the same as well. Like I said, I have not yet started working on Overlapping Sets questions just yet to evaluate the two approaches Thanks, bud!

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 151

Re: Each person who attended a company meeting was either a   [#permalink] 04 Sep 2017, 19:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by