Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:26 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:26

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: Sub 505 Levelx   Parallelismx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 26
Own Kudos [?]: 643 [49]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4346
Own Kudos [?]: 30785 [29]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [5]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
General Discussion
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
It has to be C
You cannot "aid for sufferers", so A & B are out bc 'aid' is an active verb in this case.
You cannot "aid to sufferers" so bye-bye D.
And E has agreement issues btw "reduce" and "as well as aiding"
C it is by POE and by the fact that reduce and aid both act as active verbs in their respective clauses.
BTW, because may is part of the actual sentence, it should be "may significantly reduce" and not "may significantly reduces", to answer trahul4's question.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 294 [0]
Given Kudos: 4
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
I have chosen C for this question:

A. "Aid for" is not correct here - it seems to be acting as a noun that is parallel to risk. This makes no sense.

B. Same as A. If "aid" was used as a verb, it wouldn't be parallel to "reducing," so this answer choice is incorrect in either case.

C. This is the correct answer. The verb "aid" is parallel to reduce and the meaning of the sentence is clear.

D. Again, "aid to" seems to act as a noun that is parallel to risk, but this meaning doesn't make any sense. Also, "cause a significant reduction in the risk..." seems wordy - this could definitely be more concise.

E. We have a parallelism error here - reduce and aiding are not parallel.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2013
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 16 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
"Eating saltwater fish may significantly..."

How can we know if fish used in the above sentence is singular or plural?
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 871
Own Kudos [?]: 8554 [0]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
HarishLearner wrote:
"Eating saltwater fish may significantly..."

How can we know if fish used in the above sentence is singular or plural?


Hi HarishLearner

"Fish" is both singular and plural. We do not say "fishes". (may be we can see "fishes" in old bible, but it's rare.)
Example: I have 3 fish. (not 3 fishes).
Other example: deer, beer, etc.

Hope it's clear.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Posts: 37
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 90
Location: Malaysia
Schools: Babson '20
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
egmat wrote:
Hi bagdmba,

This is in response to the question you asked in the thread: various-functions-of-verb-ing-words-158049.html#p1258698

Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

The phrase “aid for” is a noun phrase which means “help for”. For example:
UN’s aid for Somalia children reaches them on time.

But in this sentence "aid" must be parallel to “reduce” and hence, must be a verb to become grammatically parallel to “reduce”. When “aid” is used as verb, we cannot use preposition after it.

o UN aids Somalia children by providing them with food and medicines.

Now, the manner in which “aid” is used in this sentence makes it illogically parallel to the risk of heart attacks: - i.e. eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce two things

o The risk of heart attack
o Aid for sufferers of arthritis – illogical implying that actual “aid” for arthritis patients may be reduced.

Thus, it is very important to use words in their correct form, otherwise meaning can be thoroughly distorted. In this sentence, we were able to infer the intended logical meaning. Based on this understanding, we should select the answer that communicates the logical meaning.


PoE:

(A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for: Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

(B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for: Incorrect. As in choice A, this choice also communicates illogical meaning. In this choice is means in reducing “the risk…” and (in reducing) “aid for…”.

(C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid: Correct answer.

(D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to: Incorrect.
1. As in choice A, this choice also communicated illogical meaning. There are two possible lists here. But each is illogical.

a. List 1- eating saltwater fish cause a significant reduction in
i. the risk of heart attack and
ii. aid to sufferers

b. List 2- eating saltwater fish cause
i. a significant reduction in the risk of heart attack and
ii. aid to sufferers

2. Cause aid to sufferers is awkward and wordy. We say – provide aid to sufferers, not cause aid to sufferers.

(E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding: Incorrect. “aiding” is verb-ing of “aid” which not parallel to “reduce”.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha


Hi,

Had a q regarding this question. Eating saltwater fish --> This phrase is singular.. The verb following this should be singular too.. How come reduce is a plural verb here.. Also, how does the presence of the word "May" make the verb plural?

Can someone please explain this?

Thanks!!
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1261
Own Kudos [?]: 1238 [0]
Given Kudos: 1207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
GMATNinja sayantanc2k VeritasPrepKarishma

I think fundamentally verb 'aid' is not followed by any preposition.
Is my understanding correct?
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
The verb "aid" is not usually followed by a prepositional modifier, although I wouldn't rule out "aid in" in some cases: "Local firefighters will aid in the search for the missing child."

Of course, when "aid" is used as a noun, it is often followed by a prepositional modifier, as in "provide aid to the needy."
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Sep 2018
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [1]
Given Kudos: 72
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.87
WE:Engineering (Other)
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
(A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for

(B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for

(C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid

(D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to

(E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Status:Active
Affiliations: NA
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: -3 [0]
Given Kudos: 229
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE:Business Development (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
(A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for

(B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for

(C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid

(D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to

(E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding


Only C is parallel structure with reduce || to aid (use of modal verb may/will/should mandate the use of plural verb). So, ans is C.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The easiest way to knock off the answer choices in this question is to realize that ‘for’ is unnecessary in this question.

The second point we need to keep in mind is that ‘reduce’ and ‘aid’ are parallel verbs.

Now, let’s scan the options:

(A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for

(B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for

(C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid

(D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to

(E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding

Eliminate Options A, B, D, and E.

Option C
is the best choice.


Hope this helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Jun 2020
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 95
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
Can we eliminate on the basis of "Significantly" Vs "Significant"
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63658 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
swapnils10 wrote:
Can we eliminate on the basis of "Significantly" Vs "Significant"

"Significantly" is not an inherently better word to use than "significant." It all depends on the context of the sentence.

Here are two versions back-to-back:

    "Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks..."
    "Eating saltwater fish may cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks..."

Both of these are just fine! Maybe the second version is a bit less direct, but that's not a strong reason to eliminate an answer choice. Subtle differences in clarity should be considered ONLY if there are absolutely no other issues with the sentence.

Luckily, there are very strong reasons to eliminate the incorrect answer choices in this question -- the parallelism is completely off in (A), (B), (D), and (E), leaving (C) as the only possible answer.

For more on this approach to sentence correction questions, check out this article.

I hope that helps!
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Posts: 836
Own Kudos [?]: 775 [0]
Given Kudos: 1577
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
OE:
Diction; Parallelism
The word aid can be a noun or a verb; here it should be a verb that is
parallel to the verb reduce. If aid were a noun, it would parallel risk and
so would mean illogically that eating fish reduces aid for sufferers as
well as the risk of heart attacks.
A. Aid for seems to be a noun, parallel to the noun risk, indicating that
eating saltwater fish reduces aid for sufferers.
B. Aid for seems to be a noun, parallel to the noun risk, indicating that
eating saltwater fish reduces aid for sufferers.
C. Correct. In this sentence, aid is used as a verb, parallel to the verb
reduce. Sufferers is the direct object of aid; no preposition is
needed.
D. Aid to is incorrectly used as a noun, suggesting that eating saltwater
fish reduces aid to sufferers.
E. While this sentence conveys the correct meaning, it lacks the
parallel structure found in the correct answer.
The correct answer is C.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
swapnils10 wrote:
Can we eliminate on the basis of "Significantly" Vs "Significant"

"Significantly" is not an inherently better word to use than "significant." It all depends on the context of the sentence.

Here are two versions back-to-back:

    "Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks..."
    "Eating saltwater fish may cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks..."

Both of these are just fine! Maybe the second version is a bit less direct, but that's not a strong reason to eliminate an answer choice. Subtle differences in clarity should be considered ONLY if there are absolutely no other issues with the sentence.

Luckily, there are very strong reasons to eliminate the incorrect answer choices in this question -- the parallelism is completely off in (A), (B), (D), and (E), leaving (C) as the only possible answer.

For more on this approach to sentence correction questions, check out this article.

I hope that helps!

Can you explain why option D is wrong

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63658 [1]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
saby1410 wrote:
Can you explain why option D is wrong

Posted from my mobile device

The problem is the parallelism. Let's first take a look at the parallelism in the correct answer choice (C):

Quote:
(C) Eating saltwater fish may (1) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and (2) aid sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma...

Here, "reduce" and "aid" are parallel verbs (the word "significantly" is a modifier that doesn't really affect the parallelism). And each part of the parallel list works with what comes BEFORE the list:

    1) Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks.
    2) Eating saltwater fish may aid sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma.

Notice that in (D), we have "aid to sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma..." But it doesn't make any sense to say, "Eating saltwater fish may aid to sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma.

Maybe you could interpret (D) as saying "eating saltwater fish may cause (1) a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and (2) aid to sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma." But the phrase "may cause... aid to sufferers" doesn't make any sense.

The parallelism in (D) could also be interpreted like this: "Eating saltwater fish may cause a significant reduction in (1) the risk of heart attacks and (2) aid to sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma..." This of course changes the meaning entirely, making it sound as though eating saltwater fish might actually REDUCE aid to sufferers.

It's unclear what's parallel to what in (D), and none of the possible interpretations make much sense. The parallelism in (C) is much better, and that's why it's our winner.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17214
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attac [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne