Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 21:29 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 21:29

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Director
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 738
Own Kudos [?]: 1586 [11]
Given Kudos: 579
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GPA: 3.35
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 935
Own Kudos [?]: 1541 [5]
Given Kudos: 115
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [2]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Status:Long way to go!
Posts: 1144
Own Kudos [?]: 6119 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: Viet Nam
Send PM
Re: Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves [#permalink]
1
Kudos
nischalnch wrote:
Hi,
I can't understand properly why the answer is B. The paragraph talks about expansion while the answer talks about maintenance. Wouldn't it be possible that the old landfill would've been maintained even though new landfills were formed?
I got stuck between B and D and I removed B eventually.
Please tell me where I am wrong. Any explanation is helpful. Thank you.


B needs further assumption: Build new landfill will leave current landfill without continued operation and maintenance.
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [0]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves [#permalink]
Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves Sturgeon County is responsible for the vast majority of the county's groundwater pollution problem. Surprisingly, however, Sturgeon County's leading environmentalists support a ballot initiative that will invest in the expansion of the current landfill, as opposed to another initiative that will invest the same amount of money in creating a new landfill that would have zero impact on the county's groundwater.

Which of the following, if true, serves as the best justification for the environmentalists' position?

A)Several recent ecological studies suggest that the rate of pollution from the current landfill is lower than had initially been reported. -We need comparison between new land fill and old land fill.
B)Without continued operation and maintenance, the current landfill's groundwater pollution rate would more than double. -Correct
C)Groundwater pollution is less of a concern in Sturgeon County than is air pollution from the county's coal-fired power plants. -Air pollution is out of scope
D)Polling data indicates that the new landfill proposal is unlikely to pass without support from prominent environmental activists. -Out of scope
E)The site of the proposed new landfill is privately-owned land that the county would have to purchase during a period of high real estate values. -Cost is out of scope
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618842 [0]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Re: Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves [#permalink]
Expert Reply
NandishSS wrote:
Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves Sturgeon County is responsible for the vast majority of the county's groundwater pollution problem. Surprisingly, however, Sturgeon County's leading environmentalists support a ballot initiative that will invest in the expansion of the current landfill, as opposed to another initiative that will invest the same amount of money in creating a new landfill that would have zero impact on the county's groundwater.

Which of the following, if true, serves as the best justification for the environmentalists' position?


A) Several recent ecological studies suggest that the rate of pollution from the current landfill is lower than had initially been reported.
B) Without continued operation and maintenance, the current landfill's groundwater pollution rate would more than double.
C) Groundwater pollution is less of a concern in Sturgeon County than is air pollution from the county's coal-fired power plants.
D) Polling data indicates that the new landfill proposal is unlikely to pass without support from prominent environmental activists.
E) The site of the proposed new landfill is privately-owned land that the county would have to purchase during a period of high real estate values.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:




Your goal in this "Explain the Paradox" question is to find a reason why environmentalists would support the expansion of a landfill that comes with groundwater pollution problems over the construction of a new landfill that would come with no groundwater pollution problems. As you anticipate what you would want to see from a correct answer, you might think about:

-What if the new landfill doesn't have groundwater pollution problems, but instead creates other pollution problems?

-What is leaving the old landfill would create even bigger problems than staying there?

Choice B works well with the second option: if leaving the current landfill would create a much bigger environmental problem than staying there would, that is a reason that those who care about the environment would vote to stay. Choice B is correct.

Choices A and C may be tempting, but each comes with a significant flaw. Note that A, while reducing the impact of the pollution problem with the current landfill, still leaves the ballot proposals as a comparison between "some pollution" and "no pollution," so you still don't have a reason that the environmentalists would pick "some" when "none" is an option. And while choice C may seem to hit the standard of "what about other types of pollution other than just groundwater?" note that the argument doesn't provide any reason to suspect that the new landfill would create more air pollution. With all known information, it's still a comparison between "some pollution" and "no pollution."

Choice D is irrelevant - what the polls suggest is no reason for the environmentalists to choose pollution over no pollution. And choice E is carefully invalidated by the phrase "same amount" in the argument - if each plan costs the same amount, then the expense of the land for the new landfill isn't a reason to not choose it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Mar 2022
Posts: 298
Own Kudos [?]: 205 [0]
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, International Business
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.8
Send PM
Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves [#permalink]
Sturgeon county: Studies show that the current landfill is responsible for the vast majority of the county's groundwater pollution problem.
Now there are two ways to deal with this:
1. Invest in the expansion of the current landfill
2. Invest the same amount of money in creating a new landfill that would have zero impact on groundwater
Leading environmentalists support proposal 1.
Gaps: Maybe proposal 1 is better than proposal 2
Maybe if proposal 1 is not implemented it would have worst impact on groundwater

(A) Several recent ecological studies suggest that the rate of pollution from the current landfill is lower than had initially been reported. So what the other proposal has zero impact.

(B) Without continued operation and maintenance, the current landfill's groundwater pollution rate would more than double. aah that's the deal if proposal 1 is not implemented it would lead to further degradation of groundwater.

(C) Groundwater pollution is less of a concern in Sturgeon County than is air pollution from the county's coal-fired power plants. Irrelevant

(D) Polling data indicates that the new landfill proposal is unlikely to pass without support from prominent environmental activists. Does not help with the reasoning as to why environmentalists chose proposal 1

(E) The site of the proposed new landfill is privately-owned land that the county would have to purchase during a period of high real estate values. Could have been an answer if both the proposals do not require equal amount.
GMAT Club Bot
Ecological studies have shown that the current landfill that serves [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne