It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 23:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Economies in which a high percentage of resources are

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Economies in which a high percentage of resources are [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 16:01
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Economies in which a high percentage of resources are invested in research and development show greater growth in the long run than do those in which resources are channeled into consumption. Japanese workers spend a higher percentage of their income investing in research and development than do American workers.
To grow as fast as Japan has in the past three decades, the United States must change the tax code in order to encourage savings and investment and discourage debt.

Which of the following, if true, tends to weaken the argument?

(A) Japanese research is more focused on consumers than is research by American firms.
(B) Class mobility, highly valued in American culture, is encouraged by a growing rather than a stagnant economy.
(C) Studies have shown that countries with high consumption rates prosper in the short run.
(D) Proposed changes to the tax code could involve strict limits on the deductability of interest, and increased allowance for research.
(E) Because a decreasing percentage of the United States is under 40, an age when savings are traditionally low, the savings rate will increase without changes to the tax code.

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 16:54
I think the answer is E. This answer shows that savings and investment will increase naturally, without any changes to the tax code.

Kudos [?]: 481 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 162

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 17:18
.
.
.
.
E

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2893

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 21:58
Looks like E.

provides a reason that there is no need to change the tax code.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 323 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2006, 22:11
Clear winner E.

E gives us a reason to be that proposed changes in the tax code are not required.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5207

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 03:27
Pretty straighforward (E) here. America, as a whole, is saving more now because its aging population is concerned about (a debunct Social Security System) its own future financial security. These savings wouln`t require a revision in the tax code in order to subsidize R & D to stay abreast of other technologically advanced nations like Japan.

1:42

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 0

17 Aug 2006, 03:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by