It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 12:49

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [2], given: 0

Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Sep 2004, 20:52
2
KUDOS
11
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:09) correct 31% (01:19) wrong based on 1175 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?
A) the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses
B) the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself
C) it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately
D) a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
E) the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [2], given: 0

Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 891

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Sep 2004, 20:55
D. Both count it right and the same way - still a discrepancy.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 320

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2004, 00:31
Will choose D as my answer choice

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 336

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2004, 14:32
D. Well, the editor assumes that hie copy editor's word count is right.
Editor uses the Copy Editor's answer as a refernce to compare the word count of the computer.
_________________

510 on my first GMAT. 610 on second GMAT.!
The struggle continues.

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 31 Aug 2004
Posts: 606

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2004, 15:34
D for me too but I am 99% sure OA is something else...

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2004, 18:55
I am coming up with B.

If the error was a result of the computer's malfunction, then it is possible to correct the computer and the argument falls apart.

Kudos [?]: 91 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2004, 20:35
OA is D
B is confusing but if you assume B, how can you say that it is computers which failed? If computers do not malfunction, this could cast doubt into the reliablity of editors
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

Manager
Status: Dedicates 2013 to MBA !!
Joined: 06 Jul 2012
Posts: 58

Kudos [?]: 186 [2], given: 14

Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.8
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 May 2013, 19:10
2
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?

A) the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses
B) the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself
C) it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately
D) a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
E) the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
Charu Kapoor

Never Never Never GIVE UP !!

Last edited by Zarrolou on 02 May 2013, 23:15, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 186 [2], given: 14

Intern
Joined: 14 Apr 2013
Posts: 43

Kudos [?]: 116 [2], given: 3

GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 May 2013, 21:17
2
KUDOS
Let’s look at the relevant information to solve this question:
Premise: Both computer and most reliable copy editor counted the words in an article and the counts are different.
Conclusion: the computer is inaccurate.
We need to question that "why couldn't the human editor be wrong?” .So any assumption pointing in this direction will be the correct answer.

Now choice D) (a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count) says exactly what we mentioned above and hence is the correct answer.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 116 [2], given: 3

Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1126

Kudos [?]: 3549 [0], given: 123

Location: United States
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 May 2013, 21:47
CharuKapoor wrote:
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?

A) the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses
B) the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself
C) it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately
D) a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
E) the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring

IMO, D is correct.

If we negate D, the conclusion is not hold.
Conclusion: computer provides word count inaccurate (because the resulting count differed from the count the copy editor gave)
Assumption: the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3549 [0], given: 123

Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2013
Posts: 22

Kudos [?]: 23 [2], given: 1

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 May 2013, 10:00
2
KUDOS
CharuKapoor wrote:
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our articles, but surprisingly there is good reason to believe that the word count it provides is inaccurate. Several times when an article's words were carefully counted by our most reliable copy editor, the resulting count differed from the count the computer gave

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?

A) the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses
B) the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself
C) it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately
D) a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count
E) the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring

Given Argument: Word count provided by a computer and a reliable copy editor differ frequently. So the count given by computer is incorrect.

Option A: the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.
If this is correct, then the copy editor could have been asked to count with the same criteria in mind so that they can actually check the word count given by the computer.
Hence option A is incorrect.

Option B: the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself.
The editor believes that the computer is inaccurate but he neither implied nor based his belief on the premise that the computer is malfunctioning.
Hence option B is incorrect.

Option C: it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately.
Again same reasoning as the previous option. He believed that the computer is inaccurate but didn't have any idea about reason behind it.
Hence option C is incorrect.

Option D: a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count.
This means that the editor believed in the accuracy of his copy editor more than a computer and this in fact seems to be the case. When comparing the word count given by the computer to that of the copy editor, he didn't take into account the possibility that the copy editor might have been wrong. This led to his conclusion that the computer is inaccurate at times.
Therefore option D is correct.

Option E: the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is measuring.
The dependency of the computer's accuracy on the word count hasn't been mentioned anywhere and the editor himself doesn't have any idea about the discrepancies between the results.
Hence option E is incorrect.

The correct option is D

Kudos [?]: 23 [2], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2012
Posts: 56

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 9

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 May 2013, 11:08
D is correct..

Reasoning: careful counting by most reliable copy editor produces an accurate measure to compare against any other counting source.

The editor's reasoning relies on which of the following assumptions?
A) the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses

- "editor could say that we already know that fact and even after the final calculation, there is a diffference - such as one thermometer can give a reading in celsius while other in farenheit , each one will be considered correct in reation to each other as long as C to F conversion or vice versa equates to same value."

B) the inaccuracy of the computer's word count does not result from a malfunction of the computer itself

"editor will say , i dont care what is producing this inaccurate count from the computer , but i do know that it is producing inaccurate count and the reason could be 'malfunction of the computer or not "

Negating the statement -
the inaccuracy of the computer's word count results from the malfunction of the computer itself" - doesn't effect the argument - "editor could say - i knew that , i have believed it that was the reason"

so this statement is not necessarily true as it can go either way

C) it would be possible to modify the computer so that it counted words more accurately

"irrelevant - the point in question is whether computer counts accurately or not"

D) a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be less accurate than the computer's count

negate this -
"a careful count by the copy editor is unlikely to be as accurate as or more than the computer's count"

This makes the argument fall apart because copy editor is no longer reliable source for comparing accuracy - Hence correct

E) the accuracy of the computer's word count is not dependent on the length of the article that it is being measured

"editor would say - we dont care about what the computer's word count depends on,but we do care that it gives us correct counts.It may take into consideration whatever parameters it has to take to do so"
_________________

giving kudos is the best thing you can do for me..

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 9

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jul 2014, 09:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 561

Kudos [?]: 709 [0], given: 80

Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Mar 2015, 05:32
Actually a good question but no one saw this one for 11 years. Verbal Bot please bump this one.
_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Kudos [?]: 709 [0], given: 80

Manager
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Posts: 167

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 48

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Finance
GMAT Date: 05-10-2015
GPA: 3.51
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Mar 2015, 07:18
+1 for D.
As the editor`s conclusion depends on premise that words carefully counted by reliable copy editor are different, so counting by computer is incorrect.
Assumption is copy editor is not wrong.
_________________

Please give Kudos to the post if you liked.

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 48

Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Jul 2015, 12:46
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Can some one explain why A is incorrect.

I do get D as answer but cannot find any reason to discard A.

Conclusion is the word count provided by comp is incorrect as the editor is getting a different count.

(A)the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses

Upon negation, the statement becomes:
The criteria that comp uses in determining what constitutes a single word DOES NOT differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.

this means that whatever comp is counting, is equal to what copy editor counts. therefore, no discrepancy.
This attacks the conclusion

however i also feel its out of scope as the argument is not talking anywhere about the method but as its assumption i can assume to attack the conclusion.

Pl explain where i am going wrong.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 9

Manager
Joined: 10 Nov 2014
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 2

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2015, 07:38
shail2509 wrote:
Can some one explain why A is incorrect.

I do get D as answer but cannot find any reason to discard A.

Conclusion is the word count provided by comp is incorrect as the editor is getting a different count.

(A)the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses

Upon negation, the statement becomes:
The criteria that comp uses in determining what constitutes a single word DOES NOT differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.

this means that whatever comp is counting, is equal to what copy editor counts. therefore, no discrepancy.
This attacks the conclusion

however i also feel its out of scope as the argument is not talking anywhere about the method but as its assumption i can assume to attack the conclusion.

Pl explain where i am going wrong.

The argument talks about the accuracy.
In A, although knowing that the criteria is different, it does not matter with the accuracy.

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 2

Current Student
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 262

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 23

Location: South Africa
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 May 2016, 02:43
shail2509 wrote:
Can some one explain why A is incorrect.

I do get D as answer but cannot find any reason to discard A.

Conclusion is the word count provided by comp is incorrect as the editor is getting a different count.

(A)the criteria that the computer uses in determining what constitutes a single word differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses

Upon negation, the statement becomes:
The criteria that comp uses in determining what constitutes a single word DOES NOT differ from the criteria that the copy editor uses.

this means that whatever comp is counting, is equal to what copy editor counts. therefore, no discrepancy.
This attacks the conclusion

however i also feel its out of scope as the argument is not talking anywhere about the method but as its assumption i can assume to attack the conclusion.

Pl explain where i am going wrong.

Hi Shail, A is just opposite of one of the assumptions

The author assumes that both computer and copy-writer are using the same criteria. That's why he says the computer is less accurate because the word count is different from the copy-writer's. Had this been the opposite, it would have been the perfect answer.
_________________

Kudos if I helped

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 23

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Jun 2016, 11:34
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2014
Posts: 67

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 82

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GPA: 2.75
Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Nov 2016, 14:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Conclusion - There is good reason to believe that count given by computer is wrong.
Premise - Count given by computer is different from that given by reliable copy editor.

Here argument is saying that out of two values A and B, A is wrong because A differs from B.
This can be concluded only when B is right. If B is also wrong, what is the ground on basis of which, we can say that A is wrong?
Hence option D perfectly fits and bridges the gap between Premise and conclusion:-

Premise - Count given by computer is different from that given by reliable copy editor.
Assumption - And count given by copy editor is correct.
Conclusion - Therefor there is good reason to believe that count given by computer is wrong.

Other options:-
A - This talks about criteria but we are concerned with the final count of both computer and copy editor. Even if criteria used by both is same, this still doesn't make any difference because premise mentions that final result is different for both and we cannot question the premise.

B - This talks about reason for inaccuracy of computer. But are we concerned about that? Even if reason of inaccuracy of computer was not malfunction but something else, what difference does it make to the final count? Still the output is wrong and no difference in that.

C - Again irrelevant. We are not concerned with what is possible to do. Even if we negate this option, it will have no effect on conclusion.

E - Again we are not concerned about the factors on which accuracy of computer depends. Negating this option as well will not have any effect on conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 82

Re: Editor: We use the computer to check the length of our   [#permalink] 16 Nov 2016, 14:42

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 28 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by